House Connington Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Fine, be stubborn - but WHY, for love of the Seven - WHY WYNCH? eta: uh yeah, what they said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Clegane Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 It's called "keeping your options open." Now you have an excuse to vote multiple people. I don't really buy that as a sign of guilt so early in Day 1, especially one as uneventful as this, but it's a valid enough claim. Nothing wrong with having multiple suspects. A bigger problem to me is having multiple suspects who are all easy targets and popular options but I don't really see how thats the case with Sarsfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 ... and I bet nobody will be lynched after the first day. What the heck does this mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Fine, be stubborn - but WHY, for love of the Seven - WHY WYNCH? During the first day I suppose I don't need any specific reason. Call it a hunch. Call it a fixation. Call it superhuman premontion. I might be wrong but I keep being stubborn. And I ask you: WHY NOT for love of the Seven? - WHY NOT WYNCH? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mirror Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Ok so I am back and can now catch up on the thread. Anything you want me to answer straight away? Before I get bogged down with reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 What the heck does this mean? Just that: too little hard data to many people. I can't see us reaching a consensus the first day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 During the first day I suppose I don't need any specific reason. Call it a hunch. Call it a fixation. Call it superhuman premontion. I might be wrong but I keep being stubborn. And I ask you: WHY NOT for love of the Seven? - WHY NOT WYNCH? How on earth do you plan on convincing enough people to vote to get him lynched if that's the most persuasive argument you can offer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 During the first day I suppose I don't need any specific reason. Call it a hunch. Call it a fixation. Call it superhuman premontion. I might be wrong but I keep being stubborn. And I ask you: WHY NOT for love of the Seven? - WHY NOT WYNCH? You do need a reason. Not having a reason is what gets you lynched on the first day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 My reason? Honestly, I went here, I looked at all my fellow playeRs and the first thought that came into my mind was WYNCH. Logical thinking will come afterwards if I am not lynched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Clegane Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 During the first day I suppose I don't need any specific reason. Call it a hunch. Call it a fixation. Call it superhuman premontion. I might be wrong but I keep being stubborn. And I ask you: WHY NOT for love of the Seven? - WHY NOT WYNCH? superhuman premonition isn't enough to convince me to vote for him because you could just be evil and throwing whatever you want out there. Give me a reason for why I should want to vote for him And the part that really doesn't make sense is that you have been after him since the first post of th game, how could you have had a hunch before anybody else even posted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Caron - Don't think it won't happen. (you being lynched) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Same to you, dear Prester. Same to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 If you won't even consider voting for someone other than Wynch and then not try to persuade others, you might as well vote for night. In fact, I'm going to consider it a vote for night and ask you - why don't you want to lynch anyone today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 This is absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Clegane Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 If you won't even consider voting for someone other than Wynch and then not try to persuade others, you might as well vote for night. In fact, I'm going to consider it a vote for night and ask you - why don't you want to lynch anyone today? Well its not really the same as a vote for nigth because we could still lynch Wynch for other reasons any reason why you think Wynch is impossible to lynch today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 I'm just saying that if Caron won't budge, and won't find a reason to vote him that will persuade others - his vote is wasted. Much a like a vote for night. I am assuming most people want a lynch today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 And no - right now I don't have a reason to vote Wynch, although I would love to hear more from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Clegane Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 I'm just saying that if Caron won't budge, and won't find a reason to vote him that will persuade others - his vote is wasted. Much a like a vote for night. I am assuming most people want a lynch today. Right and i do agree that he's not helping but his vote is still worth more than one for night since things could turn toward wynch even without him helping to make it happen Just seemed weird like you were assuming Wynch definitly wouldn't be lynched today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Nobody said that I can't be budged. So far, though, your arguments were as persuasive as mine (no offence meant). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Tyrell Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 The case itself isn't clever. What would be clever is if Jast was a symp of Prester and that the case was based on truth. Jast says, "I would be the worst symp ever if I did that." I say, "you wouldn't be the worst symp, I find that clever." It's the fact that they were responding to each other and situations using the same words. I never said I found the case true, just that if Jast was a symp and that was their goal, it was a clever way of going about it instead of it making him the "worst symp ever." Get it yet? So in other words, you find the case with the least amount of logic, which also just happens to coincide with your terribly opportunistic vote on Prester, plausible enough to term it "clever" for no apparent reason, thus lending subtle credibility to it? Right, I think I get it pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.