Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

House Dondarrion

Mafia Game 48- It's over

Recommended Posts

Martell - setting up someone from this lynch train and saying at least one of the evils must have resisted is strange. There are not many people actually on-line right now so that seems kind of random. Are you defending Tully?
Of course I would defend a person who is supposed to be lynched for no reason whatever. If you want a random lynch, just roll a d17 and be brave enough to admit this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course I would defend a person who is supposed to be lynched for no reason whatever. If you want a random lynch, just roll a d17 and be brave enough to admit this.

Defend them like Daed defended Gert last game? :hat:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yes but you narow down the list with no logic. you say, the train is big, evil must be on it so lynch someone from train. Great deduction.
Logic? Logic is that baddies are much more willingful to lynch a random innocent that the innocents themselves. Don't you agree with this?

I've played a lot of games, and we never seen a situation where joke train would get more than three votes. Isn't it a reason to wonder?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My vote was not random. I voted Tully for a very specific reason - it just had nothing to do with my opinion of his guilt or innocence. Unless you know something specific about Tully, there really is no reason to defend him just because he is getting ganged up on. I know people do because they see it as an unfair dog pile, but that's too bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've played a lot of games, and we never seen a situation where joke train would get more than three votes. Isn't it a reason to wonder?

Never? Really? So my 4th vote must be looking really suspicious to you. It's the mythical 4th joke vote.

I don't find it a reason to wonder. I find it an opportunity to grill people who do find it something to wonder at :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gert was first voted because she wasn't going to be around to defend herself - as admited by WJ. There may have been a small amount of suspicion, but the damning evidence was the defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bah. Gert was voted for a reason. And this is a big difference, you know.

as i recall, the reason was post count. quite the reason, eh? lets metagame til we drop!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My vote was not random. I voted Tully for a very specific reason
Could you let us to know this reason? It will be much easier this way.

Well, we can allow ourselves to have one Oakeheart or Caron, but not six of them. Six is somewhat too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My reason was to see what would shake out when there was a threat against a player. The train forming on Tully for no apparent reason was a perfect opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gert was first voted because she wasn't going to be around to defend herself - as admited by WJ.
WHAT? It's either a complete misunderstanding or a direct lie, Frey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think just because people made a joke of voting Tully they should be ruled out as being FM. I know my reasons weren't nefarious but with every joke there's a hint of truth is there not? I'm not saying it's enough to make me lynch someone on the train, but I can't help but be a little suspicious of it either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And if you are seriously comparing me to Oakheart or Caron ... I'll cut ya! :kiss:

Gah! Why do people insist on referencing an alt and not what game that alt was played in (or information on what they did). Seriously, there's been like 20 'Oakhearts' in games... which do you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am neither suspicious or non-suspicious of anyone on the vote train at this point. When we have some more info to work with (CF) then I might adjust my opinions. So no, I would not use the reason that someone voted Tully as a reason to lynch today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gah! Why do people insist on referencing an alt and not what the game that alt was played in (or information on what they did). Seriously, there's been like 20 'Oakhearts' in games... which do you mean?

Someone who rarely posts and do not offer any real thoughts when they do.

...and get modkilled when they are the healer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My reason was to see what would shake out when there was a threat against a player. The train forming on Tully for no apparent reason was a perfect opportunity.
Nuts. You don't need that much votes on a person to make pressure. It's evidently excessive, especially on day 1. If you really wanted to be helpful, why won't you press somebody else? Did you see any need to go to this particular way? Did you try to find some other?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking of the last big game - Oakheart was mod-killed with a total of maybe 2 posts, and Caron never gave a reason for her actions - ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×