Jump to content

Mafia Mini 49.5


House Clegane

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Whiskeyjack' post='1306005' date='Apr 8 2008, 10.36']Anyway, guess I need to decide if I should just spell everything out for you.[/quote]

Insulting as well? nice combo there.

I'll do my best to look at the results from your voting scheme, but I am fighting off a sinus infection, so I would really like to rely on mexal, week and masonity to back you up on this course of action.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='LCOTNW' post='1306022' date='Apr 8 2008, 11.46']Insulting as well? nice combo there.[/quote]

It wasn't an insult.


In other news....Mexal and Week failing to make an appearance this morning is a bit strange. I really can't help but feel that Mexal is holding back in this game. Its extremely suspicious when compared to how he normally plays.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Whiskeyjack' post='1306034' date='Apr 8 2008, 10.50']In other news....Mexal and Week failing to make an appearance this morning is a bit strange. I really can't help but feel that Mexal is holding back in this game. Its extremely suspicious when compared to how he normally plays.[/quote]

Week posted that he had to go to class for 2 hours (about 2 hours ago) so he should be here soon. Mexal played a little low-key in game 49, as well, but that was alted. :dunno: I thought he was coming back after dinner last night to post.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Whiskeyjack' post='1306034' date='Apr 8 2008, 11.50']It wasn't an insult.


In other news....Mexal and Week failing to make an appearance this morning is a bit strange. I really can't help but feel that Mexal is holding back in this game. Its extremely suspicious when compared to how he normally plays.[/quote]

This is a different type of game. It's not based on subjective reasoning followed with logical deductions. It's based on straight logic and figuring out optimal combinations of night actions which isn't my strong suit. However, I am trying to go through your ideas but I've been really busy this morning with training a new co-worker so it's been slow.


[quote name='LCOTNW' post='1306058' date='Apr 8 2008, 11.59']Week posted that he had to go to class for 2 hours (about 2 hours ago) so he should be here soon. Mexal played a little low-key in game 49, as well, but that was alted. :dunno: I thought he was coming back after dinner last night to post.[/quote]

I did post.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mexal' post='1306079' date='Apr 8 2008, 13.05']This is a different type of game. It's not based on subjective reasoning followed with logical deductions. It's based on straight logic and figuring out optimal combinations which isn't my strong suit. However, I am trying to go through your combinations but I've been really busy this morning with training a new co-worker so it's been slow.[/quote]

This is pretty much where I am too. I think going to [b]night[/b] twice is our best bet to be sure we gather as much information as possible. I am working to figure out how best to use our investigations as well, but I have not had much time to go through all the permutations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fine with [b]night[/b].

I kind of doubt I'm going to have enough time to figure out the best course of action. Right now, I'm tempted to just say everyone investigate who they want to. At least then the FM can't plan anything that way, especially if we all reveal our results at the same time.

Alternatively, I'm still intrigued the plan to all investigate Masonity, but only if LCOTNW investigates Week or Mexal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think investigating whomever you want to (please put some thought in it, obviously) and revealing all at a specific time makes sense, lessens the advantage of the FM.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Weekapaug' post='1306116' date='Apr 8 2008, 12.24']I think investigating whomever you want to (please put some thought in it, obviously) and revealing all at a specific time makes sense, lessens the advantage of the FM.[/quote]

I'm fine with this plan.

I'll wait with my vote though as I know Masonity wanted to comment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Weekapaug' post='1306116' date='Apr 8 2008, 12.24']I think investigating whomever you want to (please put some thought in it, obviously) and revealing all at a specific time makes sense, lessens the advantage of the FM.[/quote]

But its not really a very satisfying solution. I really thought we'd be able to do better than that...but, personally, I just didn't have the time to go through every option. Guess it was the same for everyone else.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a phone call which distracted me. So I am not going to bother to vote going to night since we do that automatically.

I haven't had time to go through all the scenarios, but it is obvious that this is our last opportunity to measure ourselves against a CI, so it is hard to pass up.

I saw that you posted, mexal. Sorry, my bad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Whiskeyjack' post='1306273' date='Apr 8 2008, 14.39']Either way, we're going to have to wait for him to come back and send in his night PM. So he'll get a chance to talk again (unless he misses the entire night....which would suck, given that would delay us for a long time).[/quote]

That's true. I get confused sometimes with my games. On SA, they don't allow night talking.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...