Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Hm, strange, I can still see the problem on the Jeor Mormont page, but only when I'm logged put (even after I cleaned the cache). Logged in, everything displays fine.The template is back to normal as far as I can see... Does anyone have an idea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenedstark Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Seems fixed now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Hmm.. As I posted this morning, I could still see it then, when I was logged out, but a few hours later, I couldn't find anything wrong, nor at the few other times I checked the pages over the course of the day.. I guess it took a while before the change in the template was visible all over the wiki, both for logged in and logged out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 How should it be displayed in family trees, when a person had more than two marriages with offspring? Do we have any examples? The Greyjoy tree currently displays it in a way that I personally find a bit unclear to read. Is there a better option? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Do we accept pages on the wiki for characters who we only know through semi-canon sources? It was done previously for the mistresses of Aegon IV, but is this allowed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nittanian Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 Do we accept pages on the wiki for characters who we only know through semi-canon sources? It was done previously for the mistresses of Aegon IV, but is this allowed?If it's content from a published work (like a comic book or video game), I think it would be okay as long as the info's origin is clearly stated. If it's info that came from a reading (for instance, spoken westerlands history that was not included in TWOIAF), that's a question for Ran to answer, I think. On a different note, articles in "Category:Places on the eastern continent" can now be moved to "Category:Places in Essos". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 If it's content from a published work (like a comic book or video game), I think it would be okay as long as the info's origin is clearly stated. If it's info that came from a reading (for instance, spoken westerlands history that was not included in TWOIAF), that's a question for Ran to answer, I think.On a different note, articles in "Category:Places on the eastern continent" can now be moved to "Category:Places in Essos".It concerns characters mentioned in readings by name, indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Ok, I've spotted a page for Aethon Velaryon, whose name we know through readings only. Is this allowed, or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nittanian Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Is a reading the source for "Johanna Westerling", the wife of Jason Lannister? TWOIAF refers to her as Lady Johanna Lannister in "The Red Kraken". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 IIRC, it was the ConCarolinas Westerlands reading which revealed "his widow, Johanna", which was then cross-referenced with the MUSH tree for House Lannister, to reveal that she was a Westerling.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scafloc Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 IIRC, it was the ConCarolinas Westerlands reading which revealed "his widow, Johanna", which was then cross-referenced with the MUSH tree for House Lannister, to reveal that she was a Westerling.. I believe the MUSH itself it not canonical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 I believe the MUSH itself it not canonical. Well, some things are canon, others aren't... The MUSH was updated for the World Book after all, and another update will (soon) appear... The problem with that is, that we don't know what exactly is canon, and what isn't... Which means, in essence, that we shouldn't use anything from the MUSH.. But it would be my guess that the MUSH is where Johanna's last name came from Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 A question has been raised in another thread concerning the display of the death of Pate the Novice. While I personally feel that Pate is clearly dying, I can ser how some people disagree that it is immediately clear. We don't actually 'see' it happening (people rarely get to see their own deaths, and the chapter is from Pate's own POV).The issue now: should we keep Pate's death in the infobox? Or should we detail the likelyhood of his death in a paragraph below the "recent events" section? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mychel_Redfort Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 He was halfway down the alley when the cobblestones began to move beneath his feet. The stones are slick and wet, he thought, but that was not it. He could feel his heart hammering in his chest. "What's happening?" he said. His legs had turned to water. "I don't understand." "And never will," a voice said sadly. The cobblestones rushed up to kiss him. Pate tried to cry for help, but his voice was failing too. His last thought was of Rosey. It's more than heavily implied, and the appearance of "Pate" in Feast's last chapter confirms it. I agree there can be de doubts for some characters, but the real Pate is clearly dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scafloc Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I agree; Pate is dead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dragon Demands Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I think it might be prudent to merge "Golden Empire of Yi Ti" with "Yi Ti" (as well as "Dawn Empire of Yi Ti") these were two separate ages of "Yi Ti", but dealt with the same area, so they're kind of redundant in the long run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nittanian Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 Well, some things are canon, others aren't... The MUSH was updated for the World Book after all, and another update will (soon) appear... The problem with that is, that we don't know what exactly is canon, and what isn't... Which means, in essence, that we shouldn't use anything from the MUSH.. But it would be my guess that the MUSH is where Johanna's last name came from Since Ran has verified that the MUSH is not canon, I think Johanna Westerling should be moved to Johanna Lannister, her canonical name in TWOIAF. Mention could be made that she is from House Westerling according to a reading, however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 Since Ran has verified that the MUSH is not canon, I think Johanna Westerling should be moved to Johanna Lannister, her canonical name in TWOIAF. Mention could be made that she is from House Westerling according to a reading, however. Did it indeed originate from a reading? The only reading it could have been, was the Westerlands reading.. And the notes taken from there, placed in historyofwesteros.org, have an addition stating that, when cross-referenced with the MUSH, she seems to have been a Westerling.. So I think the last-name thing in MUSH only. So yeah, I agree, she should definitly be moved to Lannister. In no canon material is she described as Westerling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelenaExMachina Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 Since Ran has verified that the MUSH is not canon, I think Johanna Westerling should be moved to Johanna Lannister, her canonical name in TWOIAF. Mention could be made that she is from House Westerling according to a reading, however.Maybe it could be added as a footnote/reference? Would that work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nittanian Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 I changed the title and added links to the ConCarolinas reading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.