Gertrude Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 A serious vote for LanyThis post bothers me. The joke she starts off with seems forced and she ends it with a statement that looks more serious. She later claims that of course it was all in fun. To me it seemed like a pretty sheepish comment and now she's trying to blow it off.Edit: to clarify - the very last sentance is the one that bugs me most. If it was joking, why bother to 'clear' Mina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piper of Chaos Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Hmmmh, I am not bothered by the last sentence, but by the CF comment. It looks faked somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCOTNW Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 I don't want to encourage a role distribution discussion which is likely to hurt us, but I want to keep your attention to the fact that Raspberry Ripple did not explicitely mention that the roles are alligned with the innocent faction. I just say "guard".Well, if the choice is 2 killers vs. 10 innocents, or 3 killers vs. 9 innocents, then I would say 2 killers is more likely, especially with no CF - which favors the killers to my way of thinking. 3 vs. 9 would indeed be brutal without serious role firepower.I haven't found anyone particularly suspicious so far. *fails* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lany Freelove Cassandra Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 A serious vote for LanyThis post bothers me. The joke she starts off with seems forced and she ends it with a statement that looks more serious. She later claims that of course it was all in fun. To me it seemed like a pretty sheepish comment and now she's trying to blow it off.Edit: to clarify - the very last sentance is the one that bugs me most. If it was joking, why bother to 'clear' Mina.To make it look like a case, even though it wasn't a serious one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lany Freelove Cassandra Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Hmmmh, I am not bothered by the last sentence, but by the CF comment. It looks faked somehow.:rofl: when was the last time I read any rules post? not in the last 20 games eassily.**eta: at least not before the game started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 A serious vote for LanyThis post bothers me.Gert, I wonder why so strong player like you is trying to make a fuss out of such obviously joking post. It looks absolutely innocentish from my PoV. What do you think about Speedy and Piper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertrude Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Take out the first two lines and then show me how Lany's post is obviously light hearted.Piper seems fine, don't know about Spidey yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCOTNW Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Hmmmh, I am not bothered by the last sentence, but by the CF comment. It looks faked somehow.Both Lany and Spidey apparently missed that we don't have a CF. Misunderstanding the game format has been used in the past as an indicator of innocence. Are you saying that Lany's post seemed like she was going for the appearance of innocence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Spidey Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Both Lany and Spidey apparently missed that we don't have a CF. Misunderstanding the game format has been used in the past as an indicator of innocence. Are you saying that Lany's post seemed like she was going for the appearance of innocence?One important difference: I assumed we have the CF. Lany asked if we have one. So, yeah, I could definitely see that post as going for an impression of innocent behaviour...if that was something the FM did. However, I don't recall ever seeing an FM doing such a thing, so I actually feel a bit better about Lany because of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentat Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 One important difference: I assumed we have the CF. Lany asked if we have one. So, yeah, I could definitely see that post as going for an impression of innocent behaviour...if that was something the FM did. However, I don't recall ever seeing an FM doing such a thing, so I actually feel a bit better about Lany because of that.I pretty much agree with this. My problem with Lany is that I pretty much always find her suspicious. I've lost the count of the times I've been to some degree responsible of her been lynched on day one.Even if she's evil, I'm pretty sure she didn't read the rules either way, but that she tried to appear innocent by saying she hadn't seems a stretch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piper of Chaos Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Both Lany and Spidey apparently missed that we don't have a CF. Misunderstanding the game format has been used in the past as an indicator of innocence. Are you saying that Lany's post seemed like she was going for the appearance of innocence?Perhaps.I have no problems with people not reading the rules (properly) and I know it has happened more than once, but Lany questioned the existance of a CF. We usually have a CF, so why did she start to think that there might be no CF? And if she realized that she had no clue about the CF, why asking this in the thread instead of simply looking at the rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentat Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 And if she realized that she had no clue about the CF, why asking this in the thread instead of simply looking at the rules?Sheer lazyness? Is your theory that she read the rules, knew there was a CF and decided to pretend she hadn't so that we'd think she was innocent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piper of Chaos Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Piper seems fine, don't know about Spidey yet.Ok, so why is this big "do not cross" lanyard between us? :uhoh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piper of Chaos Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Sheer lazyness? Is your theory that she read the rules, knew there was a CF and decided to pretend she hadn't so that we'd think she was innocent?Hmmmh, you have a tendency to answer questions for other people in this game. And to make it even more worse, they're MY questions! <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lany Freelove Cassandra Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Sheer lazyness? Pretty much. :P Sorry Piper. It's not that I don't care about the games, I just wait until a few days* in (if I am still alive) to look up any info I need.*this is for vanilla games...might look a bit closer if we have a promise of a wacky set up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Spidey Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Right now, I'm inclined to vote Gert. As Malc said, it's weird that she's picking on and calling sheepish a mere joke post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Spidey Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Lany, your opinion on mentat and Gert? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lany Freelove Cassandra Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Lany, your opinion on mentat and Gert?Gert and I always bump heads, no matter we are innocent or not. I really have no idea.I need to look at mentat...might be a bit, I have an auction happening at work (right now) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piper of Chaos Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Well, if the choice is 2 killers vs. 10 innocents, or 3 killers vs. 9 innocents, then I would say 2 killers is more likely, especially with no CF - which favors the killers to my way of thinking. 3 vs. 9 would indeed be brutal without serious role firepower.I haven't found anyone particularly suspicious so far. *fails*What about the words "don't want to encourage" did you not understand? :P I want to hear more from Malc, Pebbles and the Chinese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Take out the first two lines and then show me how Lany's post is obviously light hearted.I can't.I always was bad in proving evident things.Just reread that post without a prejustice... if your role allows this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.