Old Nan Posted December 13, 2010 Author Share Posted December 13, 2010 In other words, repeatedly clicking on a thread--particularly when the prior thread explicitly stated "spoilers for WLW" and everyone involved (including the thread starter) knew Pat was reading the book and dropping non-spoilerish tidbits--gives one no grounds for complaining about being spoiled.Yet several people have done so. Myself, I sometimes don't care too much about spoilers, either those Pat has posted here (and yes, they are spoilers) or those he's posted for other books recently, which I also read, but numerous people thought overstepped the bounds of his role. But the wishes of people who want to have a naive reading of WLW, I think, should be respected. If Pat doesn't want to post them in the WLW thread, then we can always read them at his weblog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.