From Pawn to Player: Rethinking Sansa II

[Daidalos]

Really that deserves it's own thread. I feel like if we talk about who's a pawn and who's a player it would be to broad for a Sansa discussion, seeing on how Sansa is by far not the only pawn or player in Westeros (though she is responsible for more then 75% of what goes down) ;)

Naturally, the discussion would be restricted to Sansa's role. I think the question is especially relevant for her character for the following reasons: 1) she has been used as a piece by various other characters throughout the story; 2) she is learning from one of the most influential political players in Westeros; 3) the actual game of thrones has actually been explicitly referenced several times to her--it's much less of a metaphor for Sansa than for other characters, I feel; 4) the question is particularly pertinent for Sansa, considering the ongoing debates regarding her agency.

[Wouter]

It's all true Brash, but Martin wrote it in such an enigmatic, vague way that I think we're meant to go "who exactly do you mean, Tyrion!??".

In ASOS, Tyrion at least resolved at one point that he would still protect Sansa because he draped the cloak over her (relating to him not accusing her at the trial, and also dismissing the accusations against her in her absence). I do think his emotions are more complicated than only bitterness, allthough that is part of it.

I don't think he will hold a grudge against Sansa though; he has more and better reasons for his grudges against Lysa and Cersei. I don't think the man holds a grudge against, say, Bronn, for example, despite Bronn not showing up to defend him in the end. But the man never claimed he would, just like Sansa never claimed anything except that she would go ahead with the ceremony as ordered.

[1234567]

I know the title of this thread is "From Pawn to Player," but might it not be interesting to emphasise this aspect of Sansa's relevance to the game of thrones when discussing point 5? Does she become more of a pawn as the story progresses, while at the same time gaining the skills to play the game? If a pawn, who moves her; if a player, which pieces does she move and for what purpose? And so on and so forth, I'm sure you can think of more on this topic.

I know it is a chess analogy, but a Pawn can become a Queen if it makes it across the board.

[Daidalos]

I know it is a chess analogy, but a Pawn can become a Queen if it makes it across the board.

It would make for an interesting subversion of the rules of chess if the Queen that was the Pawn captured her own King.

[brashcandy]

It's all true Brash, but Martin wrote it in such an enigmatic, vague way that I think we're meant to go "who exactly do you mean, Tyrion!??".

Agreed.

In ASOS, Tyrion at least resolved at one point that he would still protect Sansa because he draped the cloak over her (relating to him not accusing her at the trial, and also dismissing the accusations against her in her absence). I do think his emotions are more complicated than only bitterness, allthough that is part of it.

This is true, but by ADWD he seems IMO to be firmly on the "she betrayed me" bandwagon. Now that he's set to become powerful again via alliances in Essos, I don't know if that will bode well for those persons he thinks acted against him in Kings Landing.

I don't think he will hold a grudge against Sansa though; he has more and better reasons for his grudges against Lysa and Cersei. I don't think the man holds a grudge against, say, Bronn, for example, despite Bronn not showing up to defend him in the end. But the man never claimed he would, just like Sansa never claimed anything except that she would go ahead with the ceremony as ordered.

I don't think Tyrion would consider Bronn's refusal to risk his neck for him to be equal to Sansa's desertion, and probable framing of her husband to take the fall. Martin may have indeed intended the statement to be ambiguous, but we have two specific references to Sansa in ADWD - the false wife, and the one about girls crying when he kisses them - and both are unflattering. If Tyrion does indeed "miss" Sansa, I would not expect it's the kind of feeling that will inspire a grateful reunion.

[1234567]

Hmmm, interesting. My take on it is that he's simply bitter towards Sansa, even though there may be some confusing feelings left over. His whole quest in ADWD is to find where whores go, not wives. We might think that he'll wake up and realise that Sansa had all right to want to escape him, but Tyrion is someone known for holding and nursing a grudge, particularly against women: see Lysa and Cersei. The way I see it, Tyrion missing Sansa just makes little sense in the narrative. She always kept herself closed off, they never slept together, and in the end she leaves him to Cersei's wrath. He has absolutely no reason to miss her and every reason to think bitterly of her. Remember, in Tyrion's headspace, he wanted to make the marriage work, he would have protected Sansa from Joffrey etc etc.

I think Tyrion romanticises all the relationships in his life (apart from the one with Tysha, which really was romantic). Even in ADWD he maybe bitter towards Sansa, but then again he also sees her as an ideal he strived for: the perfect highborn girl. He never seems to acknowledge that he had any agency in hurting her (which annoys me no end) because he was complicit in this. Instead he sees himself as the romantic hero to rescue her, but the problem is that the people he has to rescue her from are his own family, to whom he is loyal and himself. He is a lot like Kevin in that respect, who also placed family loyalty above what was right. Also while I think he now likes the idea of Sansa, he is forgetting the day to day awfulness he felt within their marriage.

However Sansa is very far removed from him at the moment. Given the time it takes to travel between Meereen and Westeros (plus battles and actually locating people) it would take at nearly a year for them to meet again and even then that would be a quick journey. Sansa's story will move on in that time as we know because GRRM left Sansa's chapter out of ADWD as it starts a new plot line for her. What this plot is up for discussion.

Sansa maybe a pawn that is moved around by others, but so far she has survived and if she continues to move forward whilst picking up survival skills, she may indeed have the same almost miraculous change as a catipillar does when it turns in to a butterfly. By which I mean that everyone sees her as a simple hidden pawn, unaware that she has been changing internally all this time and may yet pull the rug out from under everyone's feet in terms of their expectations of her. Especially LF.

It would make for an interesting subversion of the rules of chess if the Queen that was the Pawn captured her own King.

Well although the textual evidence almost overwhelmingly points to LF as the savage giant, there are grounds textually for arguing it could be Tyrion that Sansa kills in the end.

[Queen Cersei I]

Rapsie said:

Now there is also a general stereotype about people who read fantasy books: namely that they are male, probably have difficulties dating women and invariably have a shit time at high school. While this is a ridiculously over the top assumption, there do seem to be a number of posters who equate Sansa to that mean girl that went to school with, or that girl at high school who would never date them etc.

Yet is this attitude something that arises through the prejudice and personal experiences of readers alone? Or is it an attitude that is clearly present in GRRM’s presentation of Sansa in the text itself? After a careful rereading of Sansa’s character arc in AGOT through AFFC, I am going to have to say the latter. And here’s the thing—Sansa is not portrayed negatively so much because of her femininity, but because of her pride in herself, her birth, and feelings of entitlement towards what she wants (all qualities that go in numerous positively portrayed male characters unquestioned.)

A few quotes to illustrate what I’m talking about:

Arya says, “Sometimes it’s just fun to ride along with the wagons and talk to people.”

Sansa knew all about the sorts of people Arya liked to talk to: squires and grooms and serving girls, old men and naked children, rough spoken freeriders of certain birth. Mycah was the worst; a butcher’s boy, thirteen and wild, he slept in the meat wagon and smelled of the slaughtering black. Just the sight of him was enough to make Sansa feel sick, but Ayra seemed to prefer his company to hers.”

Sansa on Arya: “Her long horsey face got the stubborn look that meant she was going to do something willful.”

“Sansa could never understand how two sisters, born only two years apart, could be so different. It would have been easier if Arya had been a bastard, like their half brother Jon. She even looked like Jon, with the long face and brown hair of the starks, and nothing of their lady mother in her face or her coloring. And Jon’s mother had been common, or so people whispered.

"What did Gregor do ?" Arya asked.

"He burned down a holdfast and murdered a lot of people, women and children too."

Arya screwed up her face in a scowl. "Jaime Lannister murdered Jory and Heward, and Wyl, and the Hound murdered Mycah. Somebody should have beheaded them."

"It's not the same," Sansa said. "The Hound is Joffrey's sworn shield. Your butcher's boy attacked the prince."

Once Sansa had feared that Snarks and Grupkins had stolen her sister away, and Arya was only a replacement. But when she’d asked her lady mother if she was sure that Arya was really hers and not a bastard, she had laughed and said she was sure.”

“Why couldn’t Arya be sweet and delicate and kind, like princess Myrcella? She would have liked a sister like that.”

This are only some of the countless quotes in AGOT featuring these two, where the Arya/ Sansa dynamic is portrayed in the following fashion—Sansa as the rather snobbish, elitist, bratty girly girl, Arya as the unfairly persecuted, kind, down to earth tomboy with a heart of gold.

On Winteriscoming.net, someone wrote: “Arya is amazing and bucks the Westerosi female role, but that doesn’t mean Sansa sucks for wanting to wear dresses and get married. The habitual pitting of two females against each other is an annoying bit of sexism.” And yet, it judging from quotes like the ones above, it seems that “this annoying bit of sexism” of comparing Sansa unfavorably to Arya comes directly from the author himself.

Numerous people have confessed to either find this harmless or unintentional; GRRM merely mildly taking on some of the prejudices of his time. But honestly, due to the stringency and repetition of this theme (Sansa is a pretty girl who knows she’s a pretty girl, wants a handsome mate, and is proud of herself and willing to disobey her father to get what she wants—and therefore is bad, bad, BAD!) I simply cannot see it as accidental on the author’s part.

What really seems an issue here, rather than GRRM simply trying to characterize a teenage girl and failing to do so, is that Sansa—like Cersei and a few others—is being punished for her pride. Specifically, her female pride. Not the same sort of “acceptable” pride of women like Brienne, Arya, and Asha, that entails confidence in oneself and one’s ass kicking abilities, but that nevertheless leaves the individual in question without airs, accessible, and accepting.This, in stark contrast to the “proud” but friendly, accessible, girl/ woman of the people attitudes of females like Arya, Asha, Brienne, et. Al., is a sort of pride where the female in question holds herself in high regard due to her beauty, high birth, and accomplishments. She knows what she wants and what she deserves; and this may lead her to looking down upon men GRRM relates to or rejecting men due to their physical appearance, social class, or what have you. (I should say people in general, and yet, when this tendency is shown with both Sansa and Cersei, it is always men who they are rejecting, and being demonized for it.)

With Cersei, strangely, it seems she is very much characterized as “that bitch who wouldn’t talk to me in high school”. It seems that fans are (at least initially) encouraged to dislike her for her cold demeanor and her looking down on Tyrion (as he himself does with ugly females, but whatever) as for her evil deeds.

For instance:

“His sister peered up at him with the same expression of faint distaste she had worn since the day she was born.”

It seems as though GRRM considers her placing herself above Tyrion and feeling a distaste for his looks, acting snobbishly towards him, as indications of wicked, bitchy nature.

This continues, when Cersei’s aloofness, air of superiority, and tendency to pay little attention to “good” men the author relates to is highlighted, and contrasted with Myrcella’s naturally sweet, accepting nature:

“Will Bran get better, uncle?” little Myrcella asked. She had all of her mother’s beauty, but none of her pride.”

Consider the way the attitudes of the two women are contrasted as they enter the Winterfell feast in the beginning:

“(Mryrcella) …was a wisp of a girl, not quite eight, her hair a cascade of golden curls under a jeweled net. Jon noticed the shy looks she gave Robb as they passed between the tables and the timid way she smiled at him…Robb… was grinning like a fool.

“His lord father came first, escorting the queen. She was as beautiful as men said….His father helped her up the steps to the dais and lead her to her seat, but the queen never so much as looked at him.

Cersei’s lack of interest in men like Ned and Tyrion is subtly portrayed as evidence of snobbery and specifically feminine pride on her part. And is portrayed far less favorably than the modesty and friendliness of a “good” girl like Myrcella.

And to an extent, a similar style of characterization is taken with Sansa. Rather overtly in the first book; and far more subtly in books two and three. For instance, Sansa's thoughts on social class in AGOT:

Arya says, “Sometimes it’s fun to ride in the back, so you get to talk to all different sorts of people.”

Sansa knew all about the sorts of people Arya liked to talk to: squires and grooms and serving girls, old men and naked children, rough spoke freeriders of certain birth. Mycah was the worst; a butcher’s boy, thirteen and wild, he slept in the meat wagon and smelled of the slaughtering black. Just the sight of him was enough to make Sansa feel sick, but Ayra seemed to prefer his company to hers.”

Here Sansa places herself above some common born boy. (The more accepting Arya is portrayed as morally correct here.)

I see very little effort being made to understand or sympathize with Sansa’s feelings here, or placing her attitude in context. And, once again, it is worth noting that Sansa is being castigated for her specifically female pride; for placing herself above this boy due to her high birth and social background.

I think this IS a gender issue, too, since I’ve noted males like Jaime, Tyrion, and even Ned Stark doing the same thing (operating with a great awareness of their social situation and place in the Westeros hierarchy, and looking down upon others due to this issue) with no caricature or criticism whatsoever on the part of the author. Hell, Shae and Tyrion's entire relationship is built around this issue, but that is held against him quite infrequently.

At other points, Sansa demonstrates awareness that her legitimate birth places her above the illegitimate Jon; this attitude is portrayed in the following manner:

“Sansa could never understand how two sisters, born only two years apart, could be so different. It would have been easier if Arya had been a bastard, like their half brother Jon. … And Jon’s mother had been common, or so people whispered.”

“Sansa sighed as she stitched. “Poor Jon she said. He’ get’s jealous because he’s a bastard.”

“He’s our brother,” Arya said, much too loudly. Her voice cut through the afternoon quiet of the tower room. Septa Mordane raised her eyes…

“Our half brother,” Sansa corrected, soft and precise.

“He missed the girls too, even Sansa, who never called him anything but “my half brother” since she was old enough to understand what “bastard” meant.”

Once again, Arya is portrayed as the moral, correct sister; Sansa as the foolish, snobbish one. And once again, Sansa taking some pride in her social station and using it to place herself above others—only in the context of her own thoughts, in an utterly harmless manner—is portrayed as bitchy, wrong, unforgivable; something that she needs to be taught a lesson about. And yet, numerous male characters carry these same views, and are not caricatured for them at all. (Also interesting is that once again, Sansa is seeing herself as socially superior to a male the author relates to. Coincidence? Intentional? You be the judge.)

Ultimately Sansa, in AGOT and to an extent later novels, is portrayed as “good” but also with a good deal of subtle devices to portray her as wrong, incorrect, and needing to be “taught a lesson” about countless matters. (Which is perhaps why numerous people have creepily referred to everything that has happened to her since her father’s downfall as (and I quote) “Sansa reaping what she has sewn.”

It is this (Sansa being portrayed as good but (in many respects) intentionally annoying to the reader, and needing to be “taught a lesson”)that makes me so uncomfortable with Sanas’s character arc throughout the first four books. Because try as I might, I cannot get over the idea that Sansa, in ACOK-AFFC, is being punished for something.

Oh, not overtly, and the treatment of Joffrey and others is portrayed as “wrong.” Yet I couldn’t help but notice that in a sense, like Estella from great expectations, it seemed the author was at times using a sociopathic, evil male to “give Sansa what she needed”—i.e., break her noxious pride and beat her into shape. So while Sansa’s physical abuse and trials are portrayed as clearly wrong and she is never portrayed without sympathy, there’s also a weird feel to them, as though GRRM is somehow endeavoring to “break” Sansa of her feminine pride and other undesirable qualities that she shows overtly in AGOT, more subtly in ACOK and ASOS.

[Wouter]

This is true, but by ADWD he seems IMO to be firmly on the "she betrayed me" bandwagon. Now that he's set to become powerful again via alliances in Essos, I don't know if that will bode well for those persons he thinks acted against him in Kings Landing.

I do expect we will get a Sansa-Tyrion confrontation at some point; just like Arya and Sansa, they have issues that need to be talked about (and I'll hope Sansa would give better than she'd get at that point).

Tyrion has an advantage over Cersei in that he knows he didn't give Sansa any poison; and he is aware (he explicitly thought so in ASOS) that Sansa cannot just magically summon poison either so at least one other party would have to be involved. I'd expect Tyrion will want to know who really framed him and while he will probably confront Sansa over that, I think he'd do it to get to know the real player behind the scenes (he would happen to be at the right address for that). Assuming it wouldn't be already clear by then if Sansa had turned on LF in the meantime.

Any meeting between Tyrion and Sansa would likely also take place within the framework of Dany being the power and arbiter; I would not be surprised if she would take a direct interest in matters as this.

[Daidalos]

Sansa maybe a pawn that is moved around by others, but so far she has survived and if she continues to move forward whilst picking up survival skills, she may indeed have the same almost miraculous change as a catipillar does when it turns in to a butterfly. By which I mean that everyone sees her as a simple hidden pawn, unaware that she has been changing internally all this time and may yet pull the rug out from under everyone's feet in terms of their expectations of her. Especially LF.

Actually, I think this is also a very interesting question: other characters' expectations of Sansa. While we are offered no glimpse into Littlefinger's mind--something we should be grateful for, I think--it's not much of a stretch to assume that he is a little bit delusional regarding Sansa. However, at the same time, I think Littlefinger might have a clearer idea of Sansa's abilities than most, since he is actually cultivating them. Would it be fair to say that LF might be able to gauge Sansa's intellect, but he fails to gauge her emotions?

[brashcandy]

:) And there goes Queen Cersei starting us off with a brilliant essay! Going to start the new thread folks. Please direct your responses over there.