House Frey Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 No.Why are you defending those two?You answer why you are attacking their attacker.There is a difference.no there isnt, he was attcking them, So if I attack him then by default I am defending themETA: Spelling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted August 2, 2012 Author Share Posted August 2, 2012 Vote Count #4It is Day One,12 Players remain: House Bettley, House Brax, House Crakehall, House Estren, House Falwell, House Farman, House Jast, House Kenning, House Marbrand, House Serrett, House Swyft, House Reyne.With 12 players alive, it takes 7 to lynch and 6 to go to night.2 votes for House Swyft (Bettley, Serrett)1 vote for House Reyne (Farman)1 vote for House Bettley (Swyft)1 vote for House Kenning (Jast)1 vote for House Brax (Reyne)1 vote for House Crakehall (Falwell)1 vote for House Jast (Kenning)4 Players have not voted: House Brax, House Crakehall, House Estren, House Marbrand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 JastThis is crossing into semi serious vote territory here.Nice of you to point that out for us...since you've said that, maybe you'd like to tell us why you found it particularly scummy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 no there isnt, he was attcking them, So if I attack him then by default I am defending themETA: SpellingThe difference is intent.As for how serious I am on Jast, the answer is "not very, but I'm a little concerned at his thought patterns."We were quite clearly still at least mostly in the roleplay stage of the game. Accusations and votes thrown around were pretty joking, and even ones with merit were extremely weak. And all of a sudden he's talking about lynches as if they are viable, as if we were really going to take you all the way to the gallows. It's probably a null tell, but it doesn't sit right with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Tyrell Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Why did you both choose to place unless random votes on people who hadn't shown up? Scared someone would think you are half serious?Because it's a joke vote? Can you tell me the difference between joke voting someone who is here and someone who is not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Frey Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 The difference is intent.As for how serious I am on Jast, the answer is "not very, but I'm a little concerned at his thought patterns."We were quite clearly still at least mostly in the roleplay stage of the game. Accusations and votes thrown around were pretty joking, and even ones with merit were extremely weak. And all of a sudden he's talking about lynches as if they are viable, as if we were really going to take you all the way to the gallows.It's probably a null tell, but it doesn't sit right with me.You should really learn to read, my intent was very clear..I wanted to know why reyne was questions some rp votes. it matters not if the people had posted yet, it could have been a summoning vote to see if anyone was lurking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Sunglass Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 unvote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 unvoteAny particular reason for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Clegane Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 As far as I can see, the most suspicious person at the moment is Jast, since he's been very intent on making it clear that he isn't willing to lynch anyone yet until he is absolutely sure that they are scum. He's trying to make himself pass off as an overly-cautious town, which is what I'd want people to think of me if I were scum.So for now I'm going to vote Jast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 As far as I can see, the most suspicious person at the moment is Jast, since he's been very intent on making it clear that he isn't willing to lynch anyone yet until he is absolutely sure that they are scum. He's trying to make himself pass off as an overly-cautious town, which is what I'd want people to think of me if I were scum.So for now I'm going to vote Jast.I never said I'd not lynch until I'm absolutely sure they're scum. I said I want some interaction first. Is that unreasonable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 I never said I'd not lynch until I'm absolutely sure they're scum. I said I want some interaction first. Is that unreasonable?Nope. It's clearly scummy. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Meh, I'm not getting a scum vibe from Jast so far. He seems serious, a bit cautious alright but that's not necessarily incriminating. In fact this is a game for inexperienced players, some might be inclined to hop on what looks like an easy wagon, a safe vote at that stage.Oh, and there's no real reason to be unvoting at this stage, as far as I can see. Might as well have a vote somewhere, no one's getting lynched soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Frey Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 I never said I'd not lynch until I'm absolutely sure they're scum. I said I want some interaction first. Is that unreasonable?it is very unreasonable and I find it scummy that you think we should be reasonable at all=Dyes for though who are wondering I am being scartastic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 But Jast, for the record, we're not lynching anyone in a hurry. We're still flirting with the roleplay section, although it seems we're all quite eager to get out of it. When a genuine, viable lynch train comes along it'll be for better reasons than "you are a big blue bird", trust me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 yes for though who are wondering I am being scartasticDefinition: Spinoff of the word sarcastic. Used to describe whiny, emo teenagers who like to pretend they're emotionally scarred/tormented and have a reason to be angry at the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dalt Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Marbrand gives me a bad gut feeling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Jast, how would you describe your level of experience here? Would I be accurate in suggesting that you was relatively new, and extremely excited to be in a game? Thus rendering your play so far fairly null?Marbrand grasped straight for that low hanging fruit though. And with his only post of the day. Poor form, my good man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Tyrell Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 I hate this partWhy you didn't skip it then?ReyneLooking back I don't think you are a killer, Unvote.Why did you vote him? What changed your mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dalt Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 One does not simply skip the RP stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 One does not simply skip the RP stage.Chuck Norris does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.