The Dragon has three heads Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 In Brans opening dream he sees the three eyed crow(or raven I suppose) and then Jojen tells him he can't kill it because it is him.I've always thought that Blood Raven might be a conduit so bran could get to him and use the weirnet to go to himself in dreams and awaken his power.Show seems to be insinuating this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dragon has three heads Posted April 9, 2013 Author Share Posted April 9, 2013 Butter bumps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kienn Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 Just seemed like a writer got lazy and decided the whole raven thing was too hard to explain well on screen so just shot off a cliche to end it.Personally I blame the actor who plays Jojen, that guy was in like 50 cliche kids fantasy movies in the past 10 years, it's probably warped his mind and so he suggested it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victim Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 Personally I blame the actor who plays Jojen, that guy was in like 50 cliche kids fantasy movies in the past 10 years, it's probably warped his mind and so he suggested it.I highly - HIGHLY - doubt that is the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peasant Rebel Leader Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 This sentence does seem to conflict with what we know from the book on the first look, namely that Bloodraven impersonates a three eyed crow to guide Bran. But on a second thought, there are several situations where this could prove to be true. For example, we know from Bloodraven talking about the Weirwoods that they don't know time, but simultaneously see themselves as a little sapling to a big ass tree. If you see Bran as Bloodravens successor, then Bran is the three eyed crow.It's a jarring sentence for sure in the show, but I guess we need to wait 1 to 2 seasons at least to find out more on it ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sun Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 The line struck me as strange. It made me wonder if perhaps the show is planning to dispense with BloodRaven all together. But I'm probably making too much of it, I doubt they're thinking that far ahead in terms of character elimination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince of the North Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 Yes, this worried me when I first saw it and I'm still worried. I think there is a pretty good chance they are going to simply treat the "Three-Eyed Crow/Raven" as a sort of spirit guide for Bran and write Bloodraven out completely. On the other hand, maybe they wanted to make an even more obvious allusion to it being Bloodraven so they changed the word "Crow" (which hinted at a brother of the NW) to Raven (which hints at Bloodraven, of course)? I sincerely hope it's the latter!ETA: I hope you're right, Sun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrum Aeternum Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 For example, we know from Bloodraven talking about the Weirwoods that they don't know time, but simultaneously see themselves as a little sapling to a big ass tree. If you see Bran as Bloodravens successor, then Bran is the three eyed crow.This was my interpretation as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhawk137 Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 Yeah, might be worth appending that with "for a certain value of 'you'." :cool4: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Wefald Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I always thought Bloodraven was the three-eyed crow so this line in the show struck me as odd as well.*first post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The hairy bear Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I think that they have decided to cut Bloodraven, and I can understand why they'd do this. Having the haouse of the mythical Children of the Forest presided by a rooted albino with a huge bloodstain without explaining who he is would confuse viewers. And explaining Bloodraven would take too much time. It's far easier to give his lines to some kind of Children leader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAwesomeVargoHoat Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I think that they have decided to cut Bloodraven, and I can understand why they'd do this. Having the haouse of the mythical Children of the Forest presided by a rooted albino with a huge bloodstain without explaining who he is would confuse viewers. And explaining Bloodraven would take too much time.It's far easier to give his lines to some kind of Children leader.All they have is extra time when it comes to Brans arc. Unless they're just going to show him walking for the next 4 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tall Tyrion Lannister! Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I thought it was predicting that he will be Bloodravens succesor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The hairy bear Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 All they have is extra time when it comes to Brans arc. Unless they're just going to show him walking for the next 4 years.Well, I'm convinced that S4 will include his ADWD material and afterwards Bran will be written out of the show, until he returns for the later seasons. He has like 8 chapters in ASOS+AFFC+ADWD. There's simply not material enough, and I don't see B&W inventing lots of material for him: he's not a fan favourite, he'll be alone in the far Norh, he's a cripple, and most importantly, they can't use him as an excuse to show some boobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tall Tyrion Lannister! Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 Well, I'm convinced that S4 will include his ADWD material and afterwards Bran will be written out of the show, until he returns for the later seasons. He has like 8 chapters in ASOS+AFFC+ADWD. There's simply not material enough, and I don't see B&W inventing lots of material for him: he's not a fan favourite, he'll be alone in the far Norh, he's a cripple, and most importantly, they can't use him as an excuse to show some boobs.Meera Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince of the North Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I think that they have decided to cut Bloodraven, and I can understand why they'd do this. Having the haouse of the mythical Children of the Forest presided by a rooted albino with a huge bloodstain without explaining who he is would confuse viewers. And explaining Bloodraven would take too much time.It's far easier to give his lines to some kind of Children leader.You make too much sense with this and I don't like it one bit! :)While I think Bloodraven/The Three-Eyed Crow is really great in ASoIaF I can definitely see why they would have to eliminate him from the series. They constantly need to consolidate/eliminate characters in order to bring the story to the screen - it's just too massive! Ah well, I just keep reminding myself that the show is not the books and enjoy both ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garlan Marius Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 If Bloodraven ends up cut, we can put to rest rumors of Dark Sister coming back into play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Fevre Dream Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I took Jojen's line about the Three Eyed Raven being Bran to mean........that particular Three Eyed Raven is Bran. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frumpus Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I highly - HIGHLY - doubt that is the case.can't you tell he was joking?Well, I'm convinced that S4 will include his ADWD material and afterwards Bran will be written out of the show, until he returns for the later seasons. He has like 8 chapters in ASOS+AFFC+ADWD. There's simply not material enough, and I don't see B&W inventing lots of material for him: he's not a fan favourite, he'll be alone in the far Norh, he's a cripple, and most importantly, they can't use him as an excuse to show some boobs.I agree that Bran is going to get written out after S4. He's just growing up too fast. I think Rickon will probably be killed off too since I highly doubt he's playing a major role in TWoW (because that's what EVERYONE expects and we all know GRRM likes to be less predictable). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRAVYS Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 It's a jarring sentence for sure in the show, but I guess we need to wait 1 to 2 seasons at least to find out more on it ;)To me this is just another instance of the show runners dumbing down the book and using some Empire Strikes Back storytelling to make Bran's journey easier to understand. Because, let's face it, the Bran/Bloodraven storyline is very complex -- at least it is for me. However, at least it's rooted (ha ha, get it) in things we see in the book series, unlike other scenes from this episode that were created from whole cloth by the writers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.