House Westerling Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Yeah, the reprieve. And yeah, I know it's not likely, it's just that it sounds like a trap somehow.Betty, do you feel that Grafton is likely innocent? Or just that Ryger and Umber are more likely guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Betty, do you feel that Grafton is likely innocent? Or just that Ryger and Umber are more likely guilty.The latter. You all can argue against this until game midnight, but I absolutely fail to see any logic in Grafton killing Heatherspoon. Toland, am I right when saying you didn't suspect Ryger yesterday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I can't remember if I said anything on thread, but it was creeping in. I think I agreed with you though and said that Ryger was solid until end game.So if we leave Grafton and Ryger alone and lynch Umber, then lynching Ryger the last day is a pretty sure thing barring some massive new information.I hate to vote out Umber though for two different reasons - He seems genuine, and Grafton still pisses me off on a personal level and I hate that he's made it to end game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Tyrell Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I don't get why we're rewarding Ryger's softclaim wossname. There's no way it can help us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Ryger - you said that you wouldn't kill Betty as keeping a CI around is too risky, less flexible. For this to hold true, you'd have to have some expectation that a role would come forth and CI themselves. I was personally doubting that any roles were given as it's a pretty bare-bones game numbers/balance wise. If there was a role, it would be relatively minor and probably not self-clearing.Anyway, my point is that I don't buy that argument. I know that you know that I know that you know ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I don't know why we're rewarding your continued existence in this game. We do unreasonable things. :dunno: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Be back well before lynch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I don't get why we're rewarding Ryger's softclaim wossname. There's no way it can help us.We aren't rewarfing it. I am not, at least. I just think it would be unsportmanlike to lynch a player unable to talk for now. PersonaIly, I don't trust Ryger's softclaim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Yronwood Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 The latter.You all can argue against this until game midnight, but I absolutely fail to see any logic in Grafton killing Heatherspoon.You think Ryger is scum just because of the Spoon NK? What other factors have you taken into account when reading him and Grafton? Why are you giving such importance to a NK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Though, lying about your role definitely isn't a scum tell. I could remember a few innocent doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 You think Ryger is scum just because of the Spoon NK?Evidently, no.I've explained my thoughts in post #764. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 The only one my gut is truly suspicious of is Ryger.I can't rule out Umber and Grafton, however. There is nothing ruling them out as FM whatsoever,Betty - I might be swayed to vote Umber today if we don't vote out Grafton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Yronwood Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Evidently, no.I've explained my thoughts in post #764.I don't find your theory convincing enough.Toland, if you lynch me today, tomorrow we'll have to deal with the Grafton/Ryger dilemma again. While if we lynch one of them today we have the chance of catching scum (unless you or Bet is scum, then the chances are even for both lynches). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I don't find your theory convincing enough.Too bad.Baaaaa.Toland, if you lynch me today, tomorrow we'll have to deal with the Grafton/Ryger dilemma again. While if we lynch one of them today we have the chance of catching scum (unless you or Bet is scum, then the chances are even for both lynches).So, what you point exactly is? If you don't find case on Ryger convincing enough, it should mean you find a case on Grafton convincing enough? Or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted March 20, 2012 Author Share Posted March 20, 2012 It has been four hours since the infraction, and House Ryger may return to speaking normally.(At least I think it's been four hours. This mod is really confused by the times on this board. It used to be in my time zone and it's not anymore :dunce:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Yronwood Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Too bad.Baaaaa.So, what you point exactly is? If you don't find case on Ryger convincing enough, it should mean you find a case on Grafton convincing enough? Or what?Not sure I get your question... What I mean is, I'm not going to lynch someone because of your paranoid theories when there's more evidence to base our votes on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Wythers Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I guess I don't understand the rules anymore. Have no idea how I got sheeped based on my posts.Anyway, the timing sucks. I'm leaving for lunch. Be back later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 (At least I think it's been four hours. About 3,5 hours by my clock. But never mind.Ryger, I am really eager to hear more from you before leaving into a land where mafia stuff doesn;t bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Not sure I get your question... What I mean is, I'm not going to lynch someone because of your paranoid theories when there's more evidence to base our votes on.Ok, whom you want to lynch regardless of my paranoid theories?I think you are voting me now as a place holder? Time to make a decision. about two hours left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Yronwood Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Ok, whom you want to lynch regardless of my paranoid theories?I think you are voting me now as a place holder? Time to make a decision. about two hours left.I was ready to lynch Grafton, but I've re-read him and I remembered why didn't want to lynch him before. I'm re-reading Ryger now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.