Jump to content

Cricket XVII


Paxter

Recommended Posts

Some of the whinging from the Aussie fans is pretty rich: if the Agar and Trott decisions had gone England's way (and they should have in my view), Australia wouldn't have been in the contest.

Probably because the controversial decisions that went Australia's way didn't win us the match? I don't think it's unreasonable to be annoyed by that at all. England were the better team for most of the match, but an end like that - obviously I don't think Haddin was out, and given Anderson's half-hearted appeal he didn't either - is bound to leave a sour taste in people's mouths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...