Jump to content

Line of succession to the Iron Throne


srini

Recommended Posts

I have some confusion over the Line of succession to the Iron Throne as per the customs, not game of thrones



The line of succession to the Iron Throne is the ordered sequence of all those people eligible to succeed to the Iron Throne of the Seven Kingdoms, according to customs.



Baratheon Line with Cersei's children:


Tommen Baratheon, Current King


Myrcella Baratheon or Stannis Baratheon (Not clear on their order)


Shireen Baratheon



Baratheon Line without Cersei's children:


Stannis Baratheon, Current King


Shireen Baratheon



Any idea on who is currently in line after "Shireen Baratheon".



Targaryen Line:


Aegon VI Targaryen (If Young Griff is not fake), King


Daenerys Targaryen, Queen


Tommen Baratheon or Stannis Baratheon (Depending on Above Baratheon Lines)


Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Baratheon succesion the next in line would be some distant cousin, someone who Robert/Stannis/Renly's aunty married into, most likely. If we're going by the Targaryen succesion the next in line would be any descendents of Rhae or Daella (Aegon V's sisters), after that probably House Martell, then house Blackfyre (if they're still around through the female line of course).


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which line of succession, there are a lot of different ones:



Lannister opinion:


Robert Baratheon


Joffrey Baratheon


Tommen Baratheon


Myrcella Baratheon


Stannis Baratheon (attainted)


Shireen Baratheon (attainted)


Renly Baratheon


Free for all



Stannis opinion:


Robert Baratheon


Stannis Baratheon


Shireen Baratheon


Renly Baratheon


Free for all



Traditional Targaryen succession:


Aegon V Targaryen


Jaeharys II Targaryen


Aerys II Targaryen


Rhaegar Targaryen


Aegon Targaryen


Jon Targaryen (has taken vows)


Viserys Targaryen


Rhaego Targaryen


Robert Baratheon


Stannis Baratheon


Renly Baratheon


...


Doran Martell


Quentyn Martell


Trystane Martell


some Martell cousins


...


Lord Plumm


Brown Ben Plumm if legitimate


...


Robert Arryn


Harrold Hardyng


...



Andal style Targaryen succession:


Aegon V Targaryen


Jaeharys II Targaryen


Aerys II Targaryen


Rhaegar Targaryen


Aegon Targaryen


Jon Targaryen (has taken vows)


Viserys Targaryen


Danaerys Targaryen


Rhaego Targaryen


Robert Baratheon


Stannis Baratheon


Shireen Baratheon


Renly Baratheon


...


Doran Martell


Quentyn Martell


Trystane Martell


Arianne Martell


some Martell cousins


...


Lord Plumm


Brown Ben Plumm if legitimate


...


Robert Arryn


Harrold Hardyng


...


Link to comment
Share on other sites

In traditional Targaryen there are no female heirs? I didn't know that. Also assuming that we take the Lannister claims, can Tommen just attaint Stannis and erase him from his blood right to the throne?

Yes. After the Dance of Dragons, the Targaryens included a "no females sitting the IT" clause. Their sons could inherit, but not the women themselves. Examples of this clause at work are Aegon III, Viserys II and Aegon V.

Yes, traitors can be attainted and stripped of their claims. Of course that only works as long as Tommen is accepted as the legal king...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In traditional Targaryen there are no female heirs? I didn't know that.

After disastrous civil war - Dance of Dragons - Targs changed the rules of primogeniture so that male heirs come before women heirs.

Some of us think it means that only males through male line come before women, but not males through female line (e.g. Viserys come before Rhaenys, but Stannis doesn't), while others think it means women come afetr all males (e.g. Stan comes before Dany). The issue is still undecided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[snip]

Andal style Targaryen succession:

Aegon V Targaryen

Jaeharys II Targaryen

Aerys II Targaryen

Rhaegar Targaryen

Aegon Targaryen

Jon Targaryen (has taken vows)

Rhaenys

Viserys Targaryen

Danaerys Targaryen

Rhaego Targaryen

Robert Baratheon

Stannis Baratheon

Shireen Baratheon

Renly Baratheon

...

Doran Martell

Quentyn Martell

Trystane Martell

Arianne Martell

some Martell cousins

...

Lord Plumm

Brown Ben Plumm if legitimate

...

Robert Arryn

Harrold Hardyng

...

This but I added Rhaenys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made this point on my thread about House Martell's claim but I think it's relevant to bring it up here too. As Targaryen succession tries to avoid females wherever possible and Dornish law treats them equally isn't it highly unlikely Doran is the heir to the Daenerys-Maron union in terms of the Iron Throne? Unless they mix the systems in this case.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Stannis would come before Dany in any actual Targaryen succession, even before he rebelled against them. In both councils we know of pre and post Dance, female descendents of the king being succeeded were considered with his male descendents. Ultimately a male was chosen in both cases, but never a non-Targaryen. Both times those considered were descendent of the last king, and did not include male descendents of daughters of previous kings, but did include granddaughters of the last king, even though they lost to actual male Targs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After disastrous civil war - Dance of Dragons - Targs changed the rules of primogeniture so that male heirs come before women heirs.

Some of us think it means that only males through male line come before women, but not males through female line (e.g. Viserys come before Rhaenys, but Stannis doesn't), while others think it means women come afetr all males (e.g. Stan comes before Dany). The issue is still undecided.

I think on account of the Targaryens themselves not being certain. It is something that keeps making its own precedents. The last time it got dusted off was Egg's coronation. It very well could disqualify Daenerys, strictly interpreted. If she shows up with an army, her objection stands on firm grounds- army and willingness to use it.

EDIT: Why this has gotten so interesting is that there just aren't any unattainted branches of the royal bloodline available to anyone, and with that, there are practically no legitimate male heirs. Whoever gets the sad task of coming together to sort this out is going to be looking at Shireen Baratheon, Trystane or Arianne Martell, Daenerys Targaryen- real obscure prospects viewed from as little as a generation back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remove the Lannister kids from the list of Baratheons please. I'm afraid I've come over to the Stannis Is the One True King side of the ledger. There are no Baratheon children other than Shireen. Let's not support this charade of bastards any longer!

Oh, and I don't see ME on that list yet...please amend. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stannis' Targaryen claim is through the female line. If females don't count (i.e. Salic Law), then neither does he. The scenario whereby females can transmit but not inherit falls foul of the idea that no-one should have a better claim than the person occupying the throne. If Stannis was on the throne, he'd have to abdicate if Daenerys had a son, which is ridiculous.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stannis' Targaryen claim is through the female line. If females don't count (i.e. Salic Law), then neither does he. The scenario whereby females can transmit but not inherit falls foul of the idea that no-one should have a better claim than the person occupying the throne. If Stannis was on the throne, he'd have to abdicate if Daenerys had a son, which is ridiculous.

Still happens, and heck that's half the Blackfyre rebellion right there.

Invent the mechanism that being a scion of a reigning monarch improves your standing... and Daenerys' son is still Stannis' heir. We are at the point that all of the outcomes of the various nebulous mechanisms hypothetically applied still range down to the same small pool of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still happens, and heck that's half the Blackfyre rebellion right there.

Invent the mechanism that being a scion of a reigning monarch improves your standing... and Daenerys' son is still Stannis' heir. We are at the point that all of the outcomes of the various nebulous mechanisms hypothetically applied still range down to the same small pool of people.

No, the Blackfyre claim was based on the idea that Daeron was not really Aegon IV's son, so the crown should go to the legitimised Daemon Blackfyre. It was arguing that Daeron should have never been King to start with.

Our scenario with Stannis being displaced by Daenerys' son is different. It holds that Stannis' rule is fine and dandy, until one day a distant relative pops out a boy, so he has to abdicate. Which is nonsensical. Either Salic Law applies, in which case the Targaryens are extinct, or women (and female-line men) inherit after male-line men. In the latter scenario, Daenerys comes before Stannis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the Blackfyre claim was based on the idea that Daeron was not really Aegon IV's son, so the crown should go to the legitimised Daemon Blackfyre. It was arguing that Daeron should have never been King to start with.

Our scenario with Stannis being displaced by Daenerys' son is different. It holds that Stannis' rule is fine and dandy, until one day a distant relative pops out a boy, so he has to abdicate. Which is nonsensical. Either Salic Law applies, in which case the Targaryens are extinct, or women (and female-line men) inherit after male-line men. In the latter scenario, Daenerys comes before Stannis.

I think it's important to bear in mind that these laws aren't iron clad, they can be changed by the reigning monarch. In the circumstances your suggesting I agree Stannis would never abdicate for a third cousin once removed, it's just silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...