Jump to content

What if Brandon Stark...


Andrés Garcia

Recommended Posts

The premise: Rickard Stark and Eddard Stark are killed by the Mad King. Brandon Stark becomes Lord of Winterfell. Their back stories are essentially the same. The only difference is that Rickard for some reason or other joins Eddard on his way down to King's Landing to confront Rhaegar, while Brandon stays in Winterfell with Benjen Stark. This is a very unlikely scenario, I realize, but it's not an inconceivable one.



Some questions: Would he have joined his forces with Robert's? Would he have been as successful at the Battle of the Bells? Would he have felt Eddard's outrage at the death of Elia's children? Would he have killed Jaime Lannister? Would he have sat on the throne? Would he have kept Lyanna's promise? Would he ever be considered for Hand of the King twenty years later? Once Stannis publicizes the secrecy of Cersei's bastard children, would he gain Brandon's support?


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even that way...Brandon was close to Riverrun when he heard about the abduction, even Hoster tried to stop him, and it wouldn't be Ned if he was the one to go to KL

You have to imagine that whatever minimal set of events have to occur in order to make my premise come out true have in fact occurred, but have had no substantial effect on the personalities of the characters up until that point. It's completely understandable if you can't do that, but that is still a sort of requirement. Exactly what that minimal set of events consists in is an interesting question, but it's not the one that this thread is primarily concerned with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear what you're saying. Maybe Ned is imprisoned not Brandon... Either way, years later you're saying, how do tho vs shake up if Brandon had married Cat, went down to the Tower of Joy heard Lyanna's request, etc, etc.

I believe the war turns out differently. Brandon is not as invested in Robert as Ned. The trust and bond isn't the same. From what I gather from accounts of Brandon he's hot tempered and rather abrupt. I don't think he holds on to the secret of Lyanna's child the way Ned does. One of the things that makes Ned so remarkable is his honor. It is his greatest strength and maybe his weakness too. It is a burden that probably only Eddard Stark could bear. He seems to rise to every occasion, doing what must be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The premise: Rickard Stark and Eddard Stark are killed by the Mad King. Brandon Stark becomes Lord of Winterfell. Their back stories are essentially the same. The only difference is that Rickard for some reason or other joins Eddard on his way down to King's Landing to confront Rhaegar, while Brandon stays in Winterfell with Benjen Stark. This is a very unlikely scenario, I realize, but it's not an inconceivable one.

Some questions: Would he have joined his forces with Robert's? Would he have been as successful at the Battle of the Bells? Would he have felt Eddard's outrage at the death of Elia's children? Would he have killed Jaime Lannister? Would he have sat on the throne? Would he have kept Lyanna's promise? Would he ever be considered for Hand of the King twenty years later? Once Stannis publicizes the secrecy of Cersei's bastard children, would he gain Brandon's support?

What-If Scenarios for fictional characters are futile exercises.

The characters are who they are, and do what they do, because they are written to be so and do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What-If Scenarios for fictional characters are futile exercises.

Some people say so, but I've never understood why.

The characters are who they are, and do what they do, because they are written to be so and do so.

Yes, but it still makes sense to ask what would happen if things were written slightly differently. It's a kind of conceptual thinking that I find very enjoyable. If you don't, then you can just leave the thread be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear what you're saying. Maybe Ned is imprisoned not Brandon... Either way, years later you're saying, how do tho vs shake up if Brandon had married Cat, went down to the Tower of Joy heard Lyanna's request, etc, etc.

I believe the war turns out differently. Brandon is not as invested in Robert as Ned. The trust and bond isn't the same. From what I gather from accounts of Brandon he's hot tempered and rather abrupt. I don't think he holds on to the secret of Lyanna's child the way Ned does. One of the things that makes Ned so remarkable is his honor. It is his greatest strength and maybe his weakness too. It is a burden that probably only Eddard Stark could bear. He seems to rise to every occasion, doing what must be done.[/qu

Eddard is obviously the epitome of honor but I wouldn't go so far to assume Brandon couldn't have handled the secret. Yes Brandon was more wild and impulsive than Ned but his family loyalty and honor is never questioned. Honor and family are the highest values for all the Starks. And if Brandon was leading the northern forces he would have been just as committed to avenging his family and winning the rebellion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are going for a switch in places, Brandon would do as good as Ned in managing the war, if not better. He would also likely claim the Iron Throne by right of conquest in the end, and we would end up with a totally different story, with Catelyn as Queen and Cersei as Lady of Winterfell, married to Benjen, or lady of Storm's End, married to Robert.



Rhaegar comes out to die on the Trident to Brandon's sword rather than Robert's hammer.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if this scenario actually happened there would not have been a rebellion. Ned would have gone to Kings Landing to ascertain the truth of what happened to Lyanna similar to what he did after the death of his pseudo father Jon Arryn. Eventually Ned, who is reasonable and has been shown to have a positive view of Rhaegar, would have determined that Lyanna had gone willingly and Aerys II had nothing to do with it. At this point Lord Rickard would have come to Kings Landing to discuss with Aerys II what to do about their rebellious children. I think Aerys II would ask the High Septon to absolve the marriage between Rhaegar and Lyanna (assuming they did marry) to appease Dorne and would legitimize the child as a Stark so that Jon would not be a threat to the royal inheritance. To appease the Starks, I think Aerys II would have offered a future marriage to a female Targ which would have most likely meant that Dany would have married Brandon and Catelyn's oldest son. To appease Robert I think they would have still allowed him to marry Lyanna if he still wished it and if not he most likely would have (ironically) tried to arrange a marriage with Cersie with the help of Tywin. The only losers in the whole deal would have been Rhaegar and Lyanna.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Ned being much more level headed might have been able to being peace terms, if the Mad King was not too far gone. If the Mad King still had killed Ned then I think the rebellion would have been unsuccessful. Ned was a clear balance to Roberts boldness. Brandon was even bolder then Robert and in battle might have made mistakes that would have lost them the rebellion. I could see him tying to be the one that slayed Rhaegar on the Trident or not lifting the siege at Storms End, ect. So in this line of events if their had been a rebellion then I think Brandon would have not been very successful.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's unfortunate. I will have to make do without you, then.

You see. It looks like fanfiction; it has no text evidence, goes against everything we know for sure and depends only at fan made wishful thinking.Tell me it is a fanfiction or it isn't and if isn't why it isn't one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...