House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Someone please post.That same person can also choose to relogin as invisible if they so choose. Someone needs to post soon or I will leave for work/bed/reading/raiding/crafting a flint sword. This I vow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Thorne Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Is anyone really that impressed by this prattle? Seems like a lot of noise to get a high post count, yet remain pretty safe. Kalam Mekhar. The underlined erm line in the first post really rubs me the wrong way.'erm line'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 'erm line'?That's all you have to say? I'll edit it for clarity.edit- I'm violently unimpressed that this is your opening after a 20 hour absence, Rake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Thorne Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 That's all you have to say? I'll edit it for clarity.edit- I'm violently unimpressed that this is your opening after a 20 hour absence, Rake.You may want to read the rest of the thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 You may want to read the rest of the thread?You done for the day (game day)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Yronwood Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 So wait, you (Karsa) voted for me without glancing at your role, or should I read that as your role required a more thorough reading then just a quick glance? Hmm, interesting... Anyway, can you post normally now. 3/4 of us here haven't even read the books and I can't tell what thoughts of yours are serious and what's just roleplay.I will vote for you if you don't -- this I vow. Also, before I forget: Quick Ben and Kalam are not partnered. I'm willing to make that declaration for sure. There was just too much back-and-forth between them in thread then one would expect if they were parners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Thorne Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 That's all you have to say? I'll edit it for clarity.The rest of your comment appears to revolve around Kalam posting a lot of filler. I agree. If he starts pointing at his post count later on without addressing this then we can all laugh at him. The same applies to Trull as well. In fact most of the players who decided to dispense with the RP and substituted it with complaining about RP could be accused of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Yronwood Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Also,removing my vote as I won't be back for awhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 So wait, you (Karsa) voted for me without glancing at your role, or should I read that as your role required a more thorough reading then just a quick glance? Hmm, interesting... *Toothy grin*Also, before I forget: Quick Ben and Kalam are not partnered. I'm willing to make that declaration for sure. There was just too much back-and-forth between them in thread then one would expect if they were parners.No. What is the benefit in pointing this out now?The rest of your comment appears to revolve around Kalam posting a lot of filler. I agree. If he starts pointing at his post count later on without addressing this then we can all laugh at him. The same applies to Trull as well. In fact most of the players who decided to dispense with the RP and substituted it with complaining about RP could be accused of this.Are you still pretty confident in your vote on Silchas Ruin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Just to clarify my earlier post about a 20 hour break -- this board clock is totally fucked from my current time. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Thorne Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Are you still pretty confident in your vote on Silchas Ruin?I'm happy with it, certainly. I think wishy washy play is play that benefits the FM as it makes it easier for them to hide. Silchas has been very equivocal so far and I think that's dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Thorne Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Just to clarify my earlier post about a 20 hour break -- this board clock is totally fucked from my current time. My bad.Fair enough. I wasn't sure if you'd missed my other posts entirely and assumed I'd decided to enter the game with the immortal words 'erm line' or if you'd made a typo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 I'm happy with it, certainly. I think wishy washy play is play that benefits the FM as it makes it easier for them to hide. Silchas has been very equivocal so far and I think that's dangerous.After rereading your posts and his, I actually agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Baratheon Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 I can sort of see where Rake's coming from. Most your 'observations' have been very softGenerally what one does when observing is make observations. I simply hadn't seen anything that required an inquiry. Kalam's aggressiveness and your opportunism were the two closest things. I pointed out my thoughts on Kalam and on your vote. I didn't, and don't, see a need to have attempted to make a big deal out of things that aren't. or talk about how the game has moved too fast from RP to serious discussion.The last part is what really bugs me. So the game has moved past the RP stage, why are you complaining about it instead of adding to the actual discussion?I think I made two posts about it, one of which was quite joking in manner. I wouldn't exactly call that complaining. I'm happy with it, certainly. I think wishy washy play is play that benefits the FM as it makes it easier for them to hide. Silchas has been very equivocal so far and I think that's dangerous.Can you please point out how I've been wishy washy and equivocal? It's much more polite to explain why you're attempting to paint a target on someone rather than just doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Silchas -- who are you suspicious of?Who would/will you vote for today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Targaryen Posted June 1, 2011 Author Share Posted June 1, 2011 It is day 1.16 players remain: Anomander Rake., Apsalar, Dassem Ultor, Fiddler., Gruntle, Icarium, Kalam Mekhar., Karsa Orlong, Onos T'oolan, Quick Ben, Sandalath Drukorlat, Silchas Ruin, Tehol Beddict, Toc the Younger, Trull Sengar, Yedan Derryg.9 votes are needed for a conviction or 8 to go to night.3 votes for Fiddler. (Yedan Derryg, Kalam Mekhar., Onos T'oolan)2 votes for Kalam Mekhar. (Fiddler., Karsa Orlong)1 vote for Quick Ben (Sandalath Drukorlat)1 vote for Silchas Ruin (Anomander Rake.)1 vote for Tehol Beddict (Quick Ben)1 vote for Trull Sengar (Apsalar)7 players have not voted: Dassem Ultor, Gruntle, Icarium, Silchas Ruin, Tehol Beddict, Toc the Younger, Trull Sengar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 I’m kind of unimpressed with Tehol, Yedan, Dassem and to a lesser extent Sandalath and Tool right now. None of you are really saying anything. Do any of you have thoughts you would like to share? Who are your top three suspects? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Thorne Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Can you please point out how I've been wishy washy and equivocal? It's much more polite to explain why you're attempting to paint a target on someone rather than just doing so.Certainly. I've underlinded the bits that concern me in your posts. (I've only included those that deal directly with other players.)I didn't really see anything suspicious in Ben's posts, except maybe he was trying to hard. Forcing his posts a little bit to make his presence known, perhaps. It is a little surprising that we're apparently already into the "serious stuff" part of the game, but only because you're apparently chomping to get at the bit. You appear to be trying to take control of the game very, very early. We're, what, 2.5 hours into a potentially 30-hour long day. Several players still haven't checked in, and of those who have, half of them have as many posts as you do combined. And you're already trying to build a case on someone. This may just be your personality, and isn't necessarily suspicious, but the speed at which you're trying to move things unsettles me.I disliked Trull's seemingly serious - and in my opinion undeserved - vote on you, but this does seem a little overly defensive.I disliked it, but ultimately didn't give it much thought at the time. If votes were to have continued to pile on you and he kept his vote there, I would have gone from disliking the move to being quite suspicious of it. He was much more aggressive at it while you kind of waffled.Your language is filled with little clarifying points and asides that you've used to counterract any observation you make. For instance, Quick Ben isn't suspicious, but may be trying too hard, Kalam isn't necessarily suspicious, but is unsettling, Trull's vote on Fiddler is undeserved, but Fiddler is suspicious anyway, you dislike something, but haven't thought about it. You keep trying to have a bet each way, which means later on you can hang back and then point back to your posts as an excuse to vote in however seems convenient. And you've done it 3 times in your first five or six posts.Essentially, all we know from your posts is that you've read the thread. It's ok to have an opinion that isn't black and white, but your opinions seem to be all the same shade of grey. To me, that's suspicious, it's what FM do. Hence my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Posts-Sandalath Drukorlat 4Onos T'oolan 4Dassem Ultor 3Apsalar 2Tehol Beddict 1Yedan Derryg 1Gruntle 0Icarium 0Toc the Younger 0*loosens flint sword from its sheath* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 I’m kind of unimpressed with Tehol, Yedan, Dassem and to a lesser extent Sandalath and Tool right now. None of you are really saying anything. Do any of you have thoughts you would like to share? Who are your top three suspects?Apsalar, Gruntle, Icarium, and Toc are cool with you?eta- You still like your vote on Kalam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.