Seli Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Hmm, so SJW is basically tone policing against people that don't accept status quo and try to act and organize against it.Still a blind insult. And you might want to read up on Bindel to see why she is upset to be critizized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinDonner Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 what next? The feminist woman's front vs the Abstract women's front of Feminism?Splitters!Also: lynch mobs? McCarthyist witch-hunts? As far as I can see, making negative comments on Twitter does not entail either of these things. It's not the "SJWs" making death threats and rape threats and driving people from their homes and out of their jobs, ya know. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solmyr Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Every time I read more than a few pages back in a thread of this kind, I find out at least one of the avid participants has been adorned with a banned tag. It makes me wonder what crude and snide posts I missed in my offboardness that led to the reduction in the board gene pool's diversity. ETA: On topic - the shirt was bad taste for a media event. I don't find it sexist. But then again porn isn't sexist either, yet we don't watch it at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Alexander Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Splitters!Also: lynch mobs? McCarthyist witch-hunts? As far as I can see, making negative comments on Twitter does not entail either of these things. It's not the "SJWs" making death threats and rape threats and driving people from their homes and out of their jobs, ya know. <_< Both sides are guilty of this. But then internet threat claims are empty sound and fearmingering to me, it's like saying: "i was walking home last night and some guy started shouting threats at me from a dark alley". While net threats are terrible, they are evidence of exactly nothing until they lead to conviction (meaning actual officials investigated and proved them to be real). Either let police do their work, or admit you're doing vigilante "justice" by judging/acting based on unproven claims. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/nov/18/feminism-rosetta-scientist-shirt-dapper-laughs-julien-blanc-inequality?CMP=twt_gu Great article. Though I would argue that PUA/men's rights movements are some of the most poisonous sources of shit in the world, so the julien blank thing was good call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.