kiasyd Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Rhaenys_Targaryen, I don't understand why do you insist and arguing that the boy is Ser Hugh - it is Ser Hugh, but I believe that there is a hidden message in there pointing towards the notable LF ascension. You don't believe in the hidden message and that's ok as well, I suggest us to leave it at that and agree to disagree. :) Vary's is obscure enough to make it impossible to reach a conclusive consensus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Rhaenys_Targaryen, I don't understand why do you insist and arguing that the boy is Ser Hugh - it is Ser Hugh, but I believe that there is a hidden message in there pointing towards the notable LF ascension. You don't believe in the hidden message and that's ok as well, I suggest us to leave it at that and agree to disagree. :) Vary's is obscure enough to make it impossible to reach a conclusive consensus.I believe there are plenty of hidden messages in the story, but if people insist that there is a sentence that fits perfectly for one character, while in fact it doesn't, I feel like I have to point that out. Varys trying to warn Ned, I can believe that. But this was no hidden warning, I'm afraid.But you are right. Let's stop discussing it :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.