Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 He would have been Aerys the first come again, allowing others to do his ruling. His entire life was a show of letting others do his duty. KWB, ruling dragonstone, anything during the defiance, he was a lazy fool. He only joined the war when his father told him to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bright Blue Eyes Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 That is all solid your-opinion-only. Every mention of Rhaegar in the books is fond besides Bobby. we cannot just completely dismiss the entire text because we choose to not like someone. Fond of Rhaegar? Maybe. But please, tell me how that relates to Rhaegar's competence. Excuse me even Ned said he woudln't want to fight Barristen even in his old age. He was a bad ass. He took his oath seriously and as a member of the kingsguard you are to obey Bad ass in a fight? Certainly. Intelligent? Those two traits are not linked at all. By the way, that last sentence alludes to the Nuremberg defense. Worse than Joffs? Woah. You just shattered my brain, Bright Blue Eyes. ;) Meh, just including the grown-ups. Barry served Rhaegar and his family all of Rhaegar's life, yet in his fising for tales of Rhaegr mentioned nothing of note. Do you remember the Tourney of Harrenhal or Robert's Rebellion? Rhaegar didn't do much, but what he did caused disaster and it was visible from Aegon's time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen H'Ghar Is The Doctor Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 He wasn't the only one. For what we know, all of the KG witnessed similar things. The only one saying "erm... guys, shouldn't we be doing something???" was Jaime, the one who now has dreams of them saying he betrayed his oath. To be a knight and a men of the KG isn't just obeying the King, it does have a religious component and betraying the oath and the King also means betraying your god and beliefs.On the topic of Rhaegar, I don't think he could have been a bad King. Maybe not the best King but definitely a solid one after Aerys's instability. Depending on the causes of Aerys' death, he could have faced one and many civil uprisings.Now, I see many confuse Rhaegar the Prince with Rhaegar the (future) King. Being a prince didn't really asked much of him except learning how to rule and fight, which he did at some point. Even as a child, Aerys wasn't much to force him to be a warrior when he first preferred his books. The fact that he enjoyed music, liked to be alone or investigated about the prophecy makes no real difference on his skills as a ruler. It's like saying that because you liked to party in college you're automatically meant to be a terrible professional.First off love your profile pic.Secondly all of this is correct. I actually think the fact that he was both book smart and a fierce warrior would have made him more than qualified to be king. You just have to take Harrenhall out of the equation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 He wasn't the only one. For what we know, all of the KG witnessed similar things. The only one saying "erm... guys, shouldn't we be doing something???" was Jaime, the one who now has dreams of them saying he betrayed his oath. To be a knight and a men of the KG isn't just obeying the King, it does have a religious component and betraying the oath and the King also means betraying your god and beliefs.On the topic of Rhaegar, I don't think he could have been a bad King. Maybe not the best King but definitely a solid one after Aerys's instability. Depending on the causes of Aerys' death, he could have faced one and many civil uprisings.Now, I see many confuse Rhaegar the Prince with Rhaegar the (future) King. Being a prince didn't really asked much of him except learning how to rule and fight, which he did at some point. Even as a child, Aerys wasn't much to force him to be a warrior when he first preferred his books. The fact that he enjoyed music, liked to be alone or investigated about the prophecy makes no real difference on his skills as a ruler. It's like saying that because you liked to party in college you're automatically meant to be a terrible professional.To allow rape is to be a coward, and no god would want a knight to save Aerys for his crimes. Rhaegar had duties and did not live up to them, as lord of DS it was his duty to rule it, as a knight it was his duty to protect Elia and his family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen H'Ghar Is The Doctor Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 Bad ass in a fight? Certainly. Intelligent? Those two traits are not linked at all. By the way, that last sentence alludes to the Nuremberg defense. Where in the books does it say he actually witnessed the murder of Elia and her children? He was at the battle of the trident and severely wounded and tended to by Robert's men. So how could he do anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Fond of Rhaegar? Maybe. But please, tell me how that relates to Rhaegar's competence. Bad ass in a fight? Certainly. Intelligent? Those two traits are not linked at all. By the way, that last sentence alludes to the Nuremberg defense. Meh, just including the grown-ups. Do you remember the Tourney of Harrenhal or Robert's Rebellion? Rhaegar didn't do much, but what he did caused disaster and it was visible from Aegon's time. You do realize I was backing you up right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen H'Ghar Is The Doctor Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 “ “Prince Rhaegar had two children,” Ser Barristan told him. “Rhaenys was a little girl, Aegon a babe in arms. When Tywin Lannister took King’s Landing, his men killed both of them. He served the bloody bodies up in crimson cloaks, a gift for the new king.” And what did Robert say when he saw them? Did he smile? Barristan Selmy had been badly wounded on the Trident, so he had been spared the sight of Lord Tywin’s gift, but oft he wondered. If I had seen him smile over the red ruins of Rhaegar’s children, no army on this earth could have stopped me from killing him. “I will not suffer the murder of children. Accept that, or I’ll have no part of this.”[12] ”– Barristan's thoughts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Where in the books does it say he actually witnessed the murder of Elia and her children? He was at the battle of the trident and severely wounded and tended to by Robert's men. So how could he do anything? He did not protect the innocent, Rhaella or kept true to his monarchy, the Targ Baretheon team switch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 “ “Prince Rhaegar had two children,” Ser Barristan told him. “Rhaenys was a little girl, Aegon a babe in arms. When Tywin Lannister took King’s Landing, his men killed both of them. He served the bloody bodies up in crimson cloaks, a gift for the new king.” And what did Robert say when he saw them? Did he smile? Barristan Selmy had been badly wounded on the Trident, so he had been spared the sight of Lord Tywin’s gift, but oft he wondered. If I had seen him smile over the red ruins of Rhaegar’s children, no army on this earth could have stopped me from killing him. “I will not suffer the murder of children. Accept that, or I’ll have no part of this.”[12] ” – Barristan's thoughts Did he attack Gregor or Tywin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonCon's Red Beard Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Rhaegar had duties and did not live up to them, as lord of DS it was his duty to rule it, as a knight it was his duty to protect Elia and his family. You're never going to let that go, isn't? Really, it's like beating a dead horse/dragon. Tywin Lannister had duties to the Westerlands. He lived in KL. Jon Arryn had duties to the Vale. He lived in KL. Ned Stark had duties to the North. He lived in KL. Robb Stark had duties tot he North. He went to war and left his brother instead. Stannis was the lord of Dragonstone too. He lived in KL. They had people to do it on their names when they weren't around. Whatever his reasons were to live in KL instead, that doesn't mean he didn't care about the place or the two or three people who lived there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen H'Ghar Is The Doctor Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 Did he attack Gregor or Tywin? They had both left King's Landing by the time he made it back to King's Landing. What's done was done. Just like Oberyn didn't hunt down Tywin and kill him either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 You're never going to let that go, isn't? Really, it's like beating a dead horse/dragon.Tywin Lannister had duties to the Westerlands. He lived in KL.Jon Arryn had duties to the Vale. He lived in KL.Ned Stark had duties to the North. He lived in KL.Robb Stark had duties tot he North. He went to war and left his brother instead.Stannis was the lord of Dragonstone too. He lived in KL.They had people to do it on their names when they weren't around. Whatever his reasons were to live in KL instead, that doesn't mean he didn't care about the place or the two or three people who lived there.Twyin was hand of the kingJon was had of the kingNed was had of the kingRobb was at warStannis was master of shipsNow, compared to Rhaegar's trips to Summerhall to make songs, you would say they had actual reason to be away from their lands no? Rhaegar had no other duties that outweighed his rule of the Narrow Sea lands. He left it to others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCrannogDweller Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 He stood and watche when Aerys raped Rhaella, BBQing people and turned his cloack way too quickly. What it is to like? He was mortally wounded fighting for Rhaegar. If it wasn't for Robert sending his personal maester to tend to his wounds, he would've died there. And you're calling that "turning his cloak way too quickly"? Seriously? Just look at what he accomplished with a single action: His family loosing the throne and being almost entirely wiped out. Nah, Robert's Rebellion is entirely on Aerys. It wasn't Rhaegar's fault that his father was mad enough to execute two Lords of Winterfell. The notion that Lyanna's disappearance caused the war is convenient, but completely fallacious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 They had both left King's Landing by the time he made it back to King's Landing. What's done was done. Just like Oberyn didn't hunt down Tywin and kill him either Tywin was probably their for his own daughter's wedding and Gregor did return during the Hand's tourney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonCon's Red Beard Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Twyin was hand of the king Jon was had of the king Ned was had of the king Robb was at war Stannis was master of ships And Rhaegar was the SON of the King, next to RULE the freaking Seven Kingdoms. LALALALALLALALALA! I CANT HEAR YOU... LALALALALALAL A ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 And Rhaegar was the SON of the King, next to RULE the freaking Seven Kingdoms.LALALALALLALALALA! I CANT HEAR YOU... LALALALALALAL A ♫Which meant what? He aided in no ruling and spent his time traveling, what kept him from ruling is princely sit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pod The Impaler Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 I think Rhaegar would have been one of those Targaryens that's decent, but fairly obsessed with the occult / prophecy, and eventually would do some crazy shit in the name of "ultimate dragon destiny" or something; not something cruel but perhaps having it backfire horribly on him. Rhaegar was born in Summerhall, and even if one doesn't know for sure what took place there, you can see he's haunted by what happenned and what it meant. It was driving him to be what he was and do what he did, and I'm convinced his thing with Lyanna was a bit motivated by some kind of occult hubris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen H'Ghar Is The Doctor Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 “ If you die before you say her name, ser, I will hunt you through all seven hells.[5] ”– Prince Oberyn Martell whilst fighting Ser Gregor Clegane one of my favorite quotes, tad off topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 I think Rhaegar would have been one of those Targaryens that's decent, but fairly obsessed with the occult / prophecy, and eventually would do some crazy shit in the name of "ultimate dragon destiny" or something; not something cruel but perhaps having it backfire horribly on him. Rhaegar was born in Summerhall, and even if one doesn't know for sure what took place there, you can see he's haunted by what happenned and what it meant. It was driving him to be what he was and do what he did, and I'm convinced his thing with Lyanna was a bit motivated by some kind of occult hubris.he wasn't born in Summerhall but during it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCrannogDweller Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Tywin was probably their for his own daughter's wedding and Gregor did return during the Hand's tourney. Which is completely irrelevant because Oberyn wasn't in King's Landing at either of those occasions. Which meant what? He aided in no ruling and spent his time traveling, what kept him from ruling is princely sit? You might as well ask what the Crown Prince and Hand of the King Baelor Breakspear was doing at a tourney in the Reach. The truth is that we have no idea how involved Rhaegar was in the ruling of the Realm - and the fact that he traveled doesn't mean that he wasn't involved at all. I think Rhaegar would have been one of those Targaryens that's decent, but fairly obsessed with the occult / prophecy, and eventually would do some crazy shit in the name of "ultimate dragon destiny" or something. So you think he would've been Aegon V come again. I think that sounds like a reasonable assumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.