Koult45 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Does anyone else think it might be possible that the poison laced on the Sand Snake's weapon was non-lethal, but that the "antitode" she gave him was actually a lethal poison? Granted, I'm not really sure why you would put poison on your blade if it wasn't to kill, but I'm equally flummoxed as to why the Sand Snakes would want to heal Bronn... Maybe they don't want to listen to some annoying screams of a dying man for days -on-end? I don't know. What are your thoughts on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerys Blackfyre Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 absolutely not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nastydream Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Nah man,that will have made no sense though I wouldn't put it past D & D at this point. I think,no i hope,that bronn would be arys oakheart that would be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sultan of Westeros Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Bronn will not die by poison because Areo Hotah has to slice someone in two with that big axe of his. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardorim Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 No, I believe she did use real poison on her weapons and that the antidote was for true. I assume Tyene isn't the type that prefers killing straight out. Instead I see her as a hit and run type of person and taking great pleasure in the slow suffering of her enemies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.