House Reed Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Also, he drops an opportunistic vote on Ball.I don't think he explains why he feels Ball is suspicious. If he did I missed it.Voting for Ball at a point in time when Ball has three votes and Swann has four is being opportunistic?The comments from Ball that I thought were somewhat suspicious were mentioned in post #179. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Now is not the time - we'll only give the FM more to go on when they're deciding their night kill.Can't we at least make an exception for Harlaw? I want too see his oh-so-strong opinions on everyone in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Just because it's hypocritical for me to post that and not make it absolutely clear where I stand...Yarwyck is obviously my first choice.I like Florent's case on Upcliff. Not as much as my Yarwyck vote, but enough that I'd be very happy to switch.The Ball mob just doesn't do it for me. Sorry, I'll vote Ball before I'll see a mislynch, but there's no way I'm switching there unless it becomes desperate.Swann would be my last choice. A real mislynch avoidance lynch for me right now. So that's my preference list. What's yours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Ashford Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 I'm good with Upcliff and Overton, will vote ball, will reluctantly vote Yarwyck will not vote Swann. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 1 vote: Overton (Kenning)2 votes: Ball (Ambrose, Upcliff)32 votes: Swann (Ball, Inchfield, Overton)23 vote: Yarwyck (Cassel, Overton, Harlaw)2 vote: Upcliff (Swann, Florent)1 players have not voted: YarwyckFixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Can't we at least make an exception for Harlaw? I want too see his oh-so-strong opinions on everyone in the game.Want all you like honeypie, but there's a season for all things, and this is not the season for my tiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Voting for Ball at a point in time when Ball has three votes and Swann has four is being opportunistic?Voting for either one looks opportunistic, especially when its thrown down without much reasoning (in the post where you vote). Which isn't to say its wrong, because they could be evil. But there's no question that it looks opportunistic from an outside POV.Notice I said that Overton's vote on Swann looked bad too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Somebody tell me the case on Yarwyck. Just his quick mob vote on Ball?If so, how is that different than the case on Swann? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Somebody tell me the case on Yarwyck. Just his quick mob vote on Ball?If so, how is that different than the case on Swann?Did you miss his wishy washy middle road post of wonder?Swann also has his flaws, but all of them are easily explained as "Newbie". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Somebody tell me the case on Yarwyck. Just his quick mob vote on Ball?If so, how is that different than the case on Swann?For me it's that coupled with his 'dislike'of the swann and ball trains (which were the only two viables at the time) without offering an alternative. That and I don't like that he is still a no vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Ashford Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Somebody tell me the case on Yarwyck. Just his quick mob vote on Ball?As far as I remembered/comprehended, yes.If so, how is that different than the case on Swann?It's not. Yarwick pressured Ball to say more, he answered I don't have any thoughts, we both simultanously took that as "I don't want to play" and tried to put him out of his misery. I might not be the unpartial person required to give that explanation, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 25 minutes to go. Is ANYONE willing to switch to ANYONE right now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Corbray Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Damn. Ok, I think I will change my vote to Upcliff. That Swann's vote against me still makes me feel odd, but she looks better to me after her latest comments and after her explanation of what I originally blamed her for. Upcliff's reasons didn't look justified to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Damn. Ok, I think I will change my vote to Upcliff. That Swann's vote against me still makes me feel odd, but she looks better to me after her latest comments and after her explanation of what I originally blamed her for. Upcliff's reasons didn't look justified to me.1 vote: Overton (Kenning)2 votes: Ball (Ambrose, Upcliff)1 vote: Swann (Inchfield)3 vote: Yarwyck (Cassel, Overton, Harlaw)3 vote: Upcliff (Swann, Florent, Ball)1 players have not voted: Yarwyck20 minutes or so to go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mooton Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Damn. Ok, I think I will change my vote to Upcliff. That Swann's vote against me still makes me feel odd, but she looks better to me after her latest comments and after her explanation of what I originally blamed her for. Upcliff's reasons didn't look justified to me.Her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Ashford Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Her?Yes, I was about to make some ball-related joke about that, but then... I just didn't bother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Reed Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 And?? What's suspicious about that? I think encouraging votes against yourself is a bit odd, regardless of what your intentions were when you made that comment. I also think statements like "If I were an FM..." are odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Upcliff Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 It's not. Yarwick pressured Ball to say more, he answered I don't have any thoughts, we both simultanously took that as "I don't want to play" and tried to put him out of his misery. That wasn't my reasoning but it's interesting that it was yours.I DO think a FM would call people's bluff by saying they have nothing to contribute; Evidence of that is in game 78, as I said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Payne Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 I'm reading Florent's case on Upcliff now. I'll make my decision between them and Yarwyck soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Targaryen Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 It is day 1.11 players remain: Ambrose, Ball, Cassel, Florent, Harlaw, Inchfield, Kenning, Overton, Swann, Upcliff, Yarwyck6 votes are needed for a conviction or 6 to go to night.1 vote: Overton (Kenning)2 votes: Ball (Ambrose, Upcliff)1 vote: Swann (- Harlaw, - Ball, Inchfield, - Overton)3 votes: Yarwyck (Cassel, + Overton, + Harlaw)3 votes: Upcliff (+ Swann, + Florent, + Ball)1 players have not voted: - Florent, Yarwyck, - Swann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.