Jump to content

Tyrell loyalty to the Mad King


Minstral

Recommended Posts

Lately I have come to doubt that the Tyrell's had any true loyalty to the Targaryen's during the rebellion against the Mad King. The Reach may have sided with the Iron Throne, but the only actions that they take is in defense of their own lands at Ashford and the relatively dull task of besieging Storms End. Mace Tyrell would have been able to leave a smaller army to besiege Storms End and achieved the same result (an inconclusive siege) and taken a good portion of his strength to make all the difference in the Riverlands. While I was wieghing these points something else pooped into my head, and that was the way that Mace Tyrell and his bannermen react to certain events.

Mace is shown to be not the brightest of individuals, yet he has an appetite for power. After House Targaryen is deposed he makes no attempt to restore his former overlords to power and instead tries to work through House Baratheon to increase the influence of Highgarden. Furthermore, the Tyrell's as a whole seem to try to better their lot at the Lannister court (trying to marry Sansa into their family, and appointing family and Bannermen to the Small Council). They are not a mysterious bunch, they want power and they want theirs to be a stable, they will not abide by the chaos of vicious and chaotic kings as in the example of Joffery. As to why they remained loyal to the Targaryen's yet played an indecisive role in Robert's war can be hinted at from their own bannermen.

From what we have seen in the Blackfyre rebellions the nobility of the Reach has been extremely divided in their support for loyalist and rebel factions. This is hinted in ADWD by a member of the Golden Company when he states that" the power of the Reach is not what it seems, even a century later we still have friends there". If we were to look for Targaryen loyalists in the Reach I would suggest Mathis Rowan judging Tyrion's reaction to how he nearly threw up when he was reminded of the the murder of the royal family, and Randyll Tarly when he is insisting that Ageon "must not be real" stronger than any person present at the small council in the last chapter of ADWD. Comparing these reactions with other Reachmen in boht cases: Redwayne is noted by Tyrion to not care in the slightest as opposed to Rowan, and Mace dismisses Ageon as a pretender without any thought.

So where am I going with this?

It is my belief that if the Tyrell's tried to stay neutral or take the side of Robert then they would have seen many of their bannermen march in support of the Targaryens. This would have been more damaging to their status of Lord Paramount of the Reach then simply picking the losing side as they did, as it would destroy what authority they have compiled for at least a generation. So to appease a powerful loyalist faction within their ranks the Tyrell's quickly gathered their Bannermen for a quick response to the threat Robert poised at Ashford (Tarly engaging the whole of Robert's army with just the vanguard may show him as very eager to combat the "Usurper"), and then proceeded to play a non decisive role for the rest of the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I've always thought that Mace Tyrell was sort of fence sitting during the Rebellion. As you have mentioned the siege of Storms End could have occured with a much smaller force. Also, the battle of Ashford although a victory for Loyalist forces under Randyll Tarly seems strange. Knowing the type of man Tarly is it seems strange that having won the battle he didn't try and pursue and finish the Rebels.

Considering that Dorne was Loyal to the Mad King there is no justification for Tyrell to not have sent at least a token force to the Trident. Imo he was waiting to see which side Tywin Lannister came down on and to hedge his bets he stayed nominally loyal to the Targs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the reason that they were not more involved with fighting against Robert's rebellion was that Aerys did not want them involved because he did not trust them. That would make sense if he thought that there were a lot of Blackfyre loyalist still in the Reach and he was paranoid that they would betray him if they got the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

probably joined them more because they thought targs would win and that if they joined them they would be awarded with greater power like maybe marrying into each others or perhaps in best possible scenarion being lord paramounts of the stormlands as well as the baratheons would all be extinguished by the targs if aerys remained king rhaegar would probaly be a lot kinder to the rebels .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if the entire Reach army was besieging Storm's End? 70,000 troops seems like an absurdly excessive number for a siege of a single castle, regardless of how important that castle is. If that's the case, Mace could have easily sent half, or even a third, of his force to join Rhaegar on the Trident to give him a clear numerical advantage. The fact that the didn't shows that his support was not fully genuine, and perhaps (as has been said) only done to appease some of his more powerful bannermen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if the entire Reach army was besieging Storm's End? 70,000 troops seems like an absurdly excessive number for a siege of a single castle, regardless of how important that castle is. If that's the case, Mace could have easily sent half, or even a third, of his force to join Rhaegar on the Trident to give him a clear numerical advantage. The fact that the didn't shows that his support was not fully genuine, and perhaps (as has been said) only done to appease some of his more powerful bannermen.

That's terribly unlikely. 20,000 men are about the limit for an army in hostile country before they start starving. Granted, at Storms End they could be fed by the Redwyne Fleet, but it's nevertheless extremely difficult.

And since Stannis had only ~500 men in Storms End, something with four digits would be more than enough to keep him there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's terribly unlikely. 20,000 men are about the limit for an army in hostile country before they start starving. Granted, at Storms End they could be fed by the Redwyne Fleet, but it's nevertheless extremely difficult.

And since Stannis had only ~500 men in Storms End, something with four digits would be more than enough to keep him there.

Yep Mace could have kept Stannis pinned up with 4-5000 and still send 10'000 plus to the Trident. He was definately hedging his bets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's terribly unlikely. 20,000 men are about the limit for an army in hostile country before they start starving. Granted, at Storms End they could be fed by the Redwyne Fleet, but it's nevertheless extremely difficult.

And since Stannis had only ~500 men in Storms End, something with four digits would be more than enough to keep him there.

Okay that makes infinitely more sense than having 70,000 troops there. It's kind of funny that he was hedging his bets on the outcome when his full support for the Targs would have tipped the scales massively in their favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay that makes infinitely more sense than having 70,000 troops there. It's kind of funny that he was hedging his bets on the outcome when his full support for the Targs would have tipped the scales massively in their favor.

I think it's possible that GRRM may have decided that The Reach could field close to a 100,000 men after he had them side and ultimately do nothing in staying loyal to the Targs. As you point out, doing the bare minimum when your involvement practically guarantee's a victory (and grattitude) for what ever side you choose is quite weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mace Tyrell's action in RR were pretty obvious, don't ruffle feathers. He supported the Mad King, sure, but why wouldn't he? None of his family members were murdered and Aerys was his liege lord. He also had no marriage alliances with any of the regions who were rising up in rebellion. So he took the prudent course, he invested Storm's End, without a direct assault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have long believed the Tyrells are still loyal to the Targs, and will support Aegon.

That would be pretty counterproductive to all they have tried to accomplish with their marriage to the Iron Throne at this point. As the Queen of Thorns puts it with her lovely cow metaphor, they are now forced to play their role to the bloody end. Viserys once thought that half the kingdoms would support his restoration from the Tyrell's, Redwayne's, and Greyjoy's. Well the Greyjoy's have now crowned themselves a second time, Lord Redwyne is noted to not care in the slightest by Tyrion, and Mace is now "erecting" the biggest penis envy symbol in the seven kingdoms to celebrate his ascendance to Hand of Tonmmen..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When did viserys ever say the greyjoys or any of the family's would help him. I don't think he ever specifically says any names and he is just deluded by his arrogance and ignorance that he just thinks that the lords of westeros actually hate the usurper and his dogs. We know he was an utter fool though

While I agree he was blinded by arrogance, as I recall he makes a list of houses that he expects to declare for him when he made a landing in Westeros. He included house Darry and Martell as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were men from the Reach at the Trident, not all of them were at Storm's End. Martin said so in a SSM

It's possible that the Tyrells felt that they owed a debt to the Targs, only gaining Highgarden in the first place because of Aegon's favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...