a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Did Qyburn experiment on women? If yes, those women?HINT: They are connected through not existing for a specific reasonIt is absolutely easy, I promise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 1. It is plenty of characters2. It is not an orderHINT: All female3. Blood relations possible, but not important4. Not septasHINT: They are connected through not existing for a specific reasonHINT: They are mentioned plenty of times5. Nothing to do with religion6. It is not a unique word they are named with, but it is specificHINT: They are mentioned in singular though, not in plular7. Their location can not be specified and not important, their connection is directly related to a loacation8. They are related through job/proffesion, though not their own HINT: Lands and children Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juli Greyjoy Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 I don't get it. Where's eddard when you need him...Any violence involved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 1. It is plenty of characters2. It is not an orderHINT: All female3. Blood relations possible, but not important4. Not septasHINT: They are connected through not existing for a specific reasonHINT: They are mentioned plenty of times5. Nothing to do with religion6. It is not a unique word they are named with, but it is specificHINT: They are mentioned in singular though, not in plular7. Their location can not be specified and not important, their connection is directly related to a loacation8. They are related through job/proffesion, though not their ownHINT: Lands and children 9. No violence involved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juli Greyjoy Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Related to heredity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 1. It is plenty of characters2. It is not an orderHINT: All female3. Blood relations possible, but not important4. Not septasHINT: They are connected through not existing for a specific reasonHINT: They are mentioned plenty of times5. Nothing to do with religion6. It is not a unique word they are named with, but it is specificHINT: They are mentioned in singular though, not in plular7. Their location can not be specified and not important, their connection is directly related to a loacation8. They are related through job/proffesion, though not their ownHINT: Lands and children9. No violence involved10. Not related to heredity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Terribly, terribly tired, will stay awhile yet though. Would you please win this. Think simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juli Greyjoy Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 I'm too dumb for this shit. :worried: HINT: They are connected through not existing for a specific reasonJust for clarification: Are they not existing for a reason or are they not existing at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Are they not existing for a reason or are they not existing at all?They exist as humans, but they never exist as *answer* at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juli Greyjoy Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 I'm sorry, I don't get it. Please go to bed if you want, I don't want to be the one keeping you from sleep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 I'm sorry, I don't get it.You don't understand me or you can not think of an answer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juli Greyjoy Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 I can't think of an answer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lozeldatkm Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 I'm too bored to host too. Maybe lozeldatkm can give it a shot since he has never done it before.The reason I don't host is because I'm always on this forum while I'm at work, and if I get a call, I can't pay attention to what's going on here.Do the people in this group realize they're part of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 1. It is plenty of characters2. It is not an orderHINT: All female3. Blood relations possible, but not important4. Not septasHINT: They are connected through not existing for a specific reasonHINT: They are mentioned plenty of times5. Nothing to do with religion6. It is not a unique word they are named with, but it is specificHINT: They are mentioned in singular though, not in plular7. Their location can not be specified and not important, their connection is directly related to a loacation8. They are related through job/proffesion, though not their ownHINT: Lands and children9. No violence involved10. Not related to heredity11. Some must know they are a part of the "group", some definitely don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuSeaworth Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Something to do with camp followers (washerwomen/whores)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a free shadow Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 1. It is plenty of characters2. It is not an orderHINT: All female3. Blood relations possible, but not important4. Not septasHINT: They are connected through not existing for a specific reasonHINT: They are mentioned plenty of times5. Nothing to do with religion6. It is not a unique word they are named with, but it is specificHINT: They are mentioned in singular though, not in plular7. Their location can not be specified and not important, their connection is directly related to a loacation8. They are related through job/proffesion, though not their ownHINT: Lands and children9. No violence involved10. Not related to heredity11. Some must know they are a part of the "group", some definitely don't12. No importance if camp fallowers (washerwomen/whores)HINT: Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuSeaworth Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Too abstract for my brain. Any clarification on "They are connected through not existing for a specific reason" possible?I see your comments above but I still can't make good sense of it. There is a specific reason they are connected, or there is a specific reason they do not exist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamcatcher Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Mole's town whores? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuSeaworth Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 I am still curious about this but not sure if it is dead now or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamcatcher Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 Aw come on, A Free Shadow, I really wanna know the answer. It's something to do with the Night's Watch, I'm sure of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.