Court of Law v. 9 (Catelyn Stark)

[Lion of Judah]

I think that's the way to do it.

I'm not sure whether there is anything really left of Catelyn Stark. Brienne described Lady Stoneheart as "the thing that used to be Catelyn Stark." I'm inclinded to think that destroying Lady Stoneheart would be an act of mercy, rather than an act of punishment.

I did that so we don't run into a double jeopardy type of situation. I totally agree with you on the mercy part, but even with that we're in dangerous waters because the court views her as insane. We cannot execute people who committed crimes while insane.

BTW: Sent you an email earlier.

[Eir]

Charge 6-(child neglect) Lady Catelyn is accused of neglecting the child of her husband Lord Eddard Stark from the day he was brought to Winterfell. Lady Catelyn actively spoke against the victim Jon Snow's character when given the opportunity. This court sites as evidence the conversation between Lady Catelyn and The King in the North Robb Stark in which she sort to convince Robb against legitimizing his brother because he was a bastard and bastards are treacherous.

Could this be adjusted to child endangerment? I don't think Catelyn neglected Jon and there was plenty of precedent to warrant her suspicions that a "bastard" child could prove harmful to the inheritance of trueborn siblings. The argument could be made, however, that she willfully exposed him to dangerous and illegal situations by turning him out of the family home as a minor (he was not yet a "man grown"), knowing that he intended to join the Night's Watch, a known consortium of rapers, thieves and other convicted felons.

ETA: On the other hand, he was in the custody of an uncle, known to be of good character and who could act in loco parentis.

[Godsbraid]

...

However, as per the Manderly Principle, this judge rules this a mercy killing.

Had they lived, the victims would have grown up to be (or already were) Freys.

...

:bowdown: This made my day! :laugh:

[Lion of Judah]

Could this be adjusted to child endangerment? I don't think Catelyn neglected Jon and there was plenty of precedent to warrant her suspicions that a "bastard" child could prove harmful to the inheritance of trueborn siblings. The argument could be made, however, that she willfully exposed him to dangerous and illegal situations by turning him out of the family home as a minor (he was not yet a "man grown"), knowing that he intended to join the Night's Watch, a known consortium of rapers, thieves and other convicted felons.

We can't really change the charges once they are announced, but you can use any fault you find in the charges to enhance your arguments. You absolutely do not have to agree with the judge that introduced the charges(in this case me :drunk: ). You find fault with that judge's argument then tear it to pieces in a legal context of course. And Jon joining the NW cannot be on Catelyn, if anything that's on Eddard, but Cat's hands are clean of that decision.

[Pod The Impaler]

Damn man....how long did that take you? :bowdown:

About half an hour, not counting the editing / formatting.

[Godsbraid]

*Gaaahw! English grammar: Y U NO BE MY FRIEND?" Seriously - If I spelled anything correctly its thanks to the spellcheck in Word… *

Charge 1A.-(Kidnapping)

Guilty. Tyrion was innocent, and Lady Catelyn had no right to arrest him without leave from the King or the Lord Paramount of the area (Lady Catelyn is the daughter of said Lord Paramount, but she still had no right to make an arrest).

Charge 1B.- Guilty. Lady Stonehearts actions also led to Petyr Freys’ death. Worth noting that this was a response to the event known as “the Red Wedding” and that it is common in Westrosi culture to invoke a blood feud/vendetta in order to achieve revenge, justice and honor when grave insult have been committed towards one’s family. The mental state of Lady Stoneheart is also questionable. Because of the crimes committed by Petyr Freys’ family, Lady Stoneheart is sentenced to pay a small, symbolic fine to the victim’s family.

Charge 2-(Miscarriage of Justice) Guilty (see 1A). Lady Catelyns’ sister must take some part of the blame despite her questionable sanity. Both should be stripped of the right to act as judge for all future*.

* They were both acting as Reagent for their underage son/husband – Lord Paramount of the Vale and of the North - at the time, and therefor had the right to act as judge in local matters of justice within their territories.

Charge 3-(Reckless Endangerment) Not guilty. Lady Catelyn had no intention of harming her victim before an eventual trial, and was in equal danger as Tyrion Lannister when the clansmen attacked. Tyrion Lannister could (theoretically) have made his way to Gulltown and taken a ship from there. He was in no way obliged to travel the same way back as when they came.

Charge-4(Inciting riots/chaos/war) Not guilty. Lady Catelyn can’t be held responsible for the actions of Lord Tywin Lannister.

Charge 5-(Treason). Charge dismissed. Lady Catelyn was pardoned by Robb Stark, King in the North, after being held in house arrest in Riverrun by her brother.

Charge 6-(child neglect). Not guilty. It is not against the law to dislike your husbands’ bastards. The behavior of Lady Stark towards the child in question is still regrettable, and if possible Lady Stark should attend a parenting class or visit a marriage counselor with her husband in order to help her deal with the negative emotions towards Jon Snow.

Charge 7-(Attempted Murder). Guilty, but I question the sanity of Lady Stoneheart. If lady Stoneheart is found insane, her accomplices (known as “the brotherhood without banners”) must take the blame and punishment.

Charge 8-(Murder)1A.- Guilty. See charge 7.

1B.- Guilty. See charge 8.

Charge 9-(Assault)-A. Charge dismissed. The actions against Podrick Payne are covered by charge 7.

Final verdict:

Lady Stoneheart/Catelyn is to pay compensations to Podrick Payne, Lady Brienne of Tarth and to the families of any victim of hers that is found not to be guilty of attending the event known as “the red wedding” or of serving houses Lannister, Frey and Bolton.

She is to pay a small, symbolical compensation to the family of Petyr Frey.

She is to – if possible – attend a parenting class and/or a marriage counselor in order to help her with her negative emotions towards Jon Snow.

The right to act as judge will be taken from her for all future.

Lady Stoneheart is to be examined by the Maesters of Oldtown, with counsel from priests of the Red God Rhollor in order to determine if Lady Stoneheart and Lady Stark can be considered the same person and the current mental state of Lady Stoneheart.

If Lady Stoneheart is found to be beyond mortal life and mentality, she shall be killed as painless as possible, and her corps is to be burned in order to prevent another resurrection.

If it is possible, Lady Stark is to be returned to her physical and mental state as it was before her death.

If Lady Stoneheart is found to have a reasonable amount of Catelyn Starks memories and mental capacity left, she is to be imprisoned and held under guard for her own and others safety.

[Eir]

We can't really change the charges once they are announced, but you can use any fault you find in the charges to enhance your arguments. You absolutely do not have to agree with the judge that introduced the charges(in this case me :drunk: ). You find fault with that judge's argument then tear it to pieces in a legal context of course.

Thanks for the clarification, and for all of these threads--they've been great fun to read! The judge is a little sketchy, though. :D

And Jon joining the NW cannot be on Catelyn, if anything that's on Eddard, but Cat's hands are clean of that decision.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this point, though Eddard was certainly more culpable and Jon himself had a huge hand in his own fate. You'll just have to put Ned on trail next! :devil:

[Flig]

Charge 1A.- Guilty.

Charge 1B.- Dismiss

Charge 2-Dismiss

Charge 3-Guilty

Charge-4-Guilty

Charge 5-Guilty

Charge 6- Not Guilty The child was not her own and was given all the amenities of a highborn child. Openly disliking a child does not constitute neglect.

Charge 7-Dismiss

Charge 8-Dismiss

1B.Dismiss

Charge 9-Dismiss

I hearby sentence the defendant to death by sword for the crimes of kidnapping, inciting chaos, reckless endangerment, and the capital crime of treason. All crimes committed under the alias of "Lady Stoneheart" should be dismissed by reason of insanity.

[Lady Sansa Stark]

Charge 1A.-(Kidnapping)This court charges Lady Catelyn Stark with the kidnapping of one Lord Tyrion Lannister of house Lannister. Lady Catelyn impeded Lord Tyrion's travel and forcefully took him to the Vale against his will to stand trial for charges unfounded.

Not guilty. She did not kidnap him, she arrested him, and she had the right to do so, considering the accusations.

Charge 1B.-Lady Catelyn now know as 'Lady Stoneheart', led a band of outlaws known as 'The Brotherhood Without Banners' in the act of kidnapping and ransoming one Petyr Frey.

Charge dismissed. Lady Stoneheart and Lady Catelyn are two totally different persons. If anything, it would amount to take a prisoner of war.

Charge 2-(Miscarriage of Justice) Because of said actions this court charges Lady Catelyn with a miscarriage of justice. Lady Catelyn invoked the Kings Justice and was not called upon by the king to lawfully carry justice out in his name. **Lady Catelyn was also advised by her uncle Blackfish Tully that her sister Lady Lysa of the Vale did not have the mental capacity to carry out justice in the kings name. His warnings were ignored even after Lady Catelyn saw Lysa's mental state first hand.

If she really invoked the King's Justice, instead of merely arresting him: Guilty, sad to say. Robb wasn't King in the North that time, so she did not have the right to invoke King's Justice. If, however, she did not explicitly state she followed the King's Justice, I deem her not guilty. I do not have the relevant passages which can confirm this or not.

Charge 3-(Reckless Endangerment) To conceal and evade capture with her prisoner Tyrion Lannister, Lady Catelyn took her traveling party through the most dangerous region of the Vale. This act led to them being attacked by the Vale clansmen, endangering the life of her illegal captive.**After his acquittal of faulty charges initiated by Lady Catelyn Lord Tyrion had no choice but through a road in which capture by Vale Clansmen was imminent.

Charge dismissed. Is this even a crime? Besides, they were armored quite well, they had good fighters in their party. Endangering the life is something different.

Charge-4(Inciting riots/chaos/war) Lady Catelyn's actions of kidnapping Tyrion Lannister, provoked a military response by his father Warden of the West Lord Tywin Lannister. A response that would not have occurred had she not unlawfully seized Tyrion Lannister.

Not guilty. The military response was all Tywin's doing, and Tywin would have found another reason to invade the Riverlands. She could not have known that Tywin Lannister's reaction would be so severe. (Honestly, who could, other than the readers?)

Charge 5-(Treason) Lady Catelyn unbeknownst to the King in the North negotiated with the enemy and agreed to terms without the kings knowledge. She released a prisoner of considerate value to the king and his allies "The King Slayer.' This court sites as precedence the trial of Alester Florent charge 3 'collusion'

Guilty. Jaime was a valuable prisoner of war. I understand why she did it, for her daughters, but this is clearly collusion. Not that Tywin wouldn't do the Red Wedding if Jaime was still a prisoner, but still.

Charge 6-(child neglect) Lady Catelyn is accused of neglecting the child of her husband Lord Eddard Stark from the day he was brought to Winterfell. Lady Catelyn actively spoke against the victim Jon Snow's character when given the opportunity. This court sites as evidence the conversation between Lady Catelyn and The King in the North Robb Stark in which she sort to convince Robb against legitimizing his brother because he was a bastard and bastards are treacherous.

Not guilty. It was not Catelyn's job to take care of her husband's bastard, he was already very lucky to grow up in Winterfell. Moreover, there is no proof Catelyn acted like that all the time. Jon does not feel much negative feelings towards her, which implies she wasn't the quite bitchy woman she was after Bran was pushed out of the window. She had no reason to think Jon would not commit treason - he was a turncloak, after all. Catelyn probably knew this. Child neglect is something different.

Charge 7-(Attempted Murder)-Lady Catelyn now known as Lady Stoneheart upon finding Brienne of Tarth and her companion Podrick Payne, ordered her band of outlaws to hang Podrick Payne, a young man with no prior knowledge or dealings with her. The act was only halted once Brienne of Tarth forcefully agreed to Lady Catelyn's terms.

Charge dismissed, for the same reasons as Charge 1B.

Charge 8-(Murder)1A.-Lady Catelyn and her band of outlaws had no interest in ransoming Petyr Frey and hanged him by the neck until he was dead before their requested ransom was paid.

Charge dismissed, see Charge 7 and 1B.

1B.-Despite his claims to have taken no part in the Red Wedding, Merret Frey was also hanged from the neck until dead while trying to pay the requested ransom for Petyr Frey. No effort was made by Lady Catelyn to corroborate or discredit Merret's claims of innocence in the act.

Charge dismissed.

Charge 9-(Assault)-A charge of assault is warranted for her actions against Podrick Payne as severe bodily harm was done to him as a result of Lady Catelyn now known as Lady Staoneheart orders.

Charge dismissed.

Verdict: Monetary fine for Lady Catelyn.

[the trees have eyes]

Lady Catelyn

1A. Kidnapping - Not guilty / innocent. Lady Catelyn arrests Tyrion on inforation she has received that he was responsible for two attempts to murder her son, Brandon. She doesnot kidnap him but arrests him and takes him into custody to face trial and the /King's justice.

1B. This judge does not consider Lady Catelyn and Lady Stoneheart to be the same legal person capable of facing trial as one person.

2. Miscarriage of Justice - Not guilty / innocent. The choice of the road to the Vale was to avoid pursuit and capture by the Lannisters which would itself have prevented a trial from occurring. Once the Bloody Gate has passed Lysa Arryn takes effective control of her prisoner and any miscarriage of justice is the responsibility of Lysa Arryn not Lady Catelyn. Having reached The Bloody Gate Lady Catelyn has no option but to present herself to the Eyrie and she is escorted there by Lysa Arryn's retainers. The Blackfish' warning is not something that she can use to change her plans, nor is it in any case an effective warning that a miscarriage of justice will occur.

3. Reckless Endangerment - Not guilty / innocent. Lady Catelyn had an armed escort with her when she took her prisoner to the Vale. There is no reason to believe that this would not be adequate to secure the safety of her prisoner or herself. The decision to send Tyrion Lannister back down the High Road is the responsibility of Lysa Arryn not Lady Catelyn.

4. Inciting riots/war/chaos - Not Guilty / innocent. Lady Catelyn arrests a man and seeks to bring him to trial. She is not responsible for inciting any riots, war or other disturbances and cannot be held responsible for the actions of those who do incite war and order murder and destruction - Jaime Lannister who orders the murder of four of Ned Stark's guards and Tywin Lannister who orders the ravaging of Sherrer and The Mummer's Ford and teh murder of their people.

5. Treason - Guilty. Lady Catelyn released the Crown's prisoner without any leave to do so and knowing full well he would reject any such course of action. Defendent is guilty as charged but the king himself showed leniency and forgiveness and this judge can not gainsay that.

6. Child neglect - not guilty / innocent. Jon Snow is a bastard and neither the laws nor customs of Westeros dictate or expect that Lady Catelyn will act as a mother to Jon Snow. The Court has asked that the judges consider that Lady Caelyn spoke ill of Jon Snow but this judge does not consider that this is a offense and in the event, finds it entirely understnadable that Lady Catelyn would remonstrate with the king and seek to persuade him not to legitimise a bastard thus putting at risk the inheritance of any of his own trueborn children.

7. Attempted murder. See 1B.

8. Murder - Petyr "Pimple" and Merrett Frey. See 1B.

9. Assault. See 1B.

This judge notes that Lady Cateyn has not been accused of the murder of Aegon "Jinglebell" Frey and that, although there are mitigating circumstances, this is a serious accusation that must be levied against Lady Catelyn.

Overall, this judge finds Lady Catelyn guilty only of treason and sentences her to confinement in comfortabtle quarters at Riverrun until the defendant can be deemed fit and responsible to govern her actions with a measure of restraint.

Lady Stoneheart

1B. Not Guilty. The luring and capturing of Petyr Pimple is act in which Lady Stoneheart is at least an accomplice. This judge finds no evidence she devised the plan and orchestrated the actions of the BWB but she is guilty of taking part. But in any event Petyr Frey is "wanted" for involvement in the hideous events of The Red Wedding that breached Westeros' sacred guest right and murdered a dozen men and women at table. PetyrFrey is thus arrested for crimes he is accused of.

8. Not Guilty. The BWB are not a properly constituted court but the fact that Petyr Pimple and Merret Frey took part in the wedding reast is established. Both are wanted for their invlvement and thouh there is n evidence they killed nyone their involvement in the plot and at the feast is established and they are therefore accessories to multiple murders and executed for these crimes.

7. Guilty. Brienne of Tarth is wholly innocent of the accusations that she betrayed her oath to Lady Catelyn and took up arms with Lady Stoneheart's sworn enemies. Her trial is a travesty that is little more than a kangaroo court and Briene is hanged for posession of a sword, a woeful decision based on hate and anger rather than the reasoned application of justice. This judge finds her guilty of the attemted murders of Brienne of Tarth, Podrick Payne and Ser Hyle Hunt.

9. Guilty though this is considered secondary to the charge of attempted murder of the three named above.

Lady Stoneheart has shown herself to be incapable of making ratinal decisions, instead hanging people without evidence of a crime and as such is deemed guilty of attempted murder. The fate of he three victims must first be establidhed but the judge finds that death would be as much a kindness as a punishment.

Verdict: death by the sword but the recommendation is for a deeper cut than last time and a quick but dignified burial before any red priests can drop by and perform funeral rites.

[Lion of Judah]

Charge 1A.-(Kidnapping)This court charges Lady Catelyn Stark with the kidnapping of one Lord Tyrion Lannister of house Lannister. Lady Catelyn impeded Lord Tyrion's travel and forcefully took him to the Vale against his will to stand trial for charges unfounded.

Not guilty. She did not kidnap him, she arrested him, and she had the right to do so, considering the accusations.

Charge 1B.-Lady Catelyn now know as 'Lady Stoneheart', led a band of outlaws known as 'The Brotherhood Without Banners' in the act of kidnapping and ransoming one Petyr Frey.

Charge dismissed. Lady Stoneheart and Lady Catelyn are two totally different persons. If anything, it would amount to take a prisoner of war.

Charge 2-(Miscarriage of Justice) Because of said actions this court charges Lady Catelyn with a miscarriage of justice. Lady Catelyn invoked the Kings Justice and was not called upon by the king to lawfully carry justice out in his name. **Lady Catelyn was also advised by her uncle Blackfish Tully that her sister Lady Lysa of the Vale did not have the mental capacity to carry out justice in the kings name. His warnings were ignored even after Lady Catelyn saw Lysa's mental state first hand.

If she really invoked the King's Justice, instead of merely arresting him: Guilty, sad to say. Robb wasn't King in the North that time, so she did not have the right to invoke King's Justice. If, however, she did not explicitly state she followed the King's Justice, I deem her not guilty. I do not have the relevant passages which can confirm this or not.

Charge 3-(Reckless Endangerment) To conceal and evade capture with her prisoner Tyrion Lannister, Lady Catelyn took her traveling party through the most dangerous region of the Vale. This act led to them being attacked by the Vale clansmen, endangering the life of her illegal captive.**After his acquittal of faulty charges initiated by Lady Catelyn Lord Tyrion had no choice but through a road in which capture by Vale Clansmen was imminent.

Charge dismissed. Is this even a crime? Besides, they were armored quite well, they had good fighters in their party. Endangering the life is something different.

Charge-4(Inciting riots/chaos/war) Lady Catelyn's actions of kidnapping Tyrion Lannister, provoked a military response by his father Warden of the West Lord Tywin Lannister. A response that would not have occurred had she not unlawfully seized Tyrion Lannister.

Not guilty. The military response was all Tywin's doing, and Tywin would have found another reason to invade the Riverlands. She could not have known that Tywin Lannister's reaction would be so severe. (Honestly, who could, other than the readers?)

Charge 5-(Treason) Lady Catelyn unbeknownst to the King in the North negotiated with the enemy and agreed to terms without the kings knowledge. She released a prisoner of considerate value to the king and his allies "The King Slayer.' This court sites as precedence the trial of Alester Florent charge 3 'collusion'

Guilty. Jaime was a valuable prisoner of war. I understand why she did it, for her daughters, but this is clearly collusion. Not that Tywin wouldn't do the Red Wedding if Jaime was still a prisoner, but still.

Charge 6-(child neglect) Lady Catelyn is accused of neglecting the child of her husband Lord Eddard Stark from the day he was brought to Winterfell. Lady Catelyn actively spoke against the victim Jon Snow's character when given the opportunity. This court sites as evidence the conversation between Lady Catelyn and The King in the North Robb Stark in which she sort to convince Robb against legitimizing his brother because he was a bastard and bastards are treacherous.

Not guilty. It was not Catelyn's job to take care of her husband's bastard, he was already very lucky to grow up in Winterfell. Moreover, there is no proof Catelyn acted like that all the time. Jon does not feel much negative feelings towards her, which implies she wasn't the quite bitchy woman she was after Bran was pushed out of the window. She had no reason to think Jon would not commit treason - he was a turncloak, after all. Catelyn probably knew this. Child neglect is something different.

Charge 7-(Attempted Murder)-Lady Catelyn now known as Lady Stoneheart upon finding Brienne of Tarth and her companion Podrick Payne, ordered her band of outlaws to hang Podrick Payne, a young man with no prior knowledge or dealings with her. The act was only halted once Brienne of Tarth forcefully agreed to Lady Catelyn's terms.

Charge dismissed, for the same reasons as Charge 1B.

Charge 8-(Murder)1A.-Lady Catelyn and her band of outlaws had no interest in ransoming Petyr Frey and hanged him by the neck until he was dead before their requested ransom was paid.

Charge dismissed, see Charge 7 and 1B.

1B.-Despite his claims to have taken no part in the Red Wedding, Merret Frey was also hanged from the neck until dead while trying to pay the requested ransom for Petyr Frey. No effort was made by Lady Catelyn to corroborate or discredit Merret's claims of innocence in the act.

Charge dismissed.

Charge 9-(Assault)-A charge of assault is warranted for her actions against Podrick Payne as severe bodily harm was done to him as a result of Lady Catelyn now known as Lady Staoneheart orders.

Charge dismissed.

Verdict: Monetary fine for Lady Catelyn.

To answer your question on if she invoked the kings justice on charge 2:

"In the name of King Robert and the good lords you serve, I call upon you to seize him and help me return him to Winterfell to await the king's justice."

[Flig]

Charge 5-(Treason) Lady Catelyn unbeknownst to the King in the North negotiated with the enemy and agreed to terms without the kings knowledge. She released a prisoner of considerate value to the king and his allies "The King Slayer.' This court sites as precedence the trial of Alester Florent charge 3 'collusion'

Guilty. Jaime was a valuable prisoner of war. I understand why she did it, for her daughters, but this is clearly collusion. Not that Tywin wouldn't do the Red Wedding if Jaime was still a prisoner, but still.

Verdict: Monetary fine for Lady Catelyn.

When has treason ever been punished with a fine?

[Pod The Impaler]

When has treason ever been punished with a fine?

And who would she pay it to - the Karstarks ?

[snowtarg]

When has treason ever been punished with a fine?

In 2001, in Sweden. Four teenagers were convicted of treason for assaulting the King with a cream pie. They were fined amounts equal to 80-100 days of their income.

[Lady Sansa Stark]

When has treason ever been punished with a fine?

One treason ain't the other. I consider this treason to be of a much lower ''level'' as other treasons, which did not really endanger the cause of Robb Stark. Hence why I let her pay a monetary fine. To her son. To invoke capital punishment for someone, he or she must have done something horrible in this judge's opinion. Since Lady Catelyn did not do something horrible in this judge's opinion, I did not sentence her to death.

[juanml82]

Releasing Robb's most valuable hostage certainly endangered his cause. Let's imagine Robb doesn't marry Jeyne and somehow Jaime reaches KG without much delay. What's stopping Cersei from commanding Robb to bend the knee and join the Night's Watch or else get his sister killed?

[TalalOfDorne]

One treason ain't the other. I consider this treason to be of a much lower ''level'' as other treasons, which did not really endanger the cause of Robb Stark. Hence why I let her pay a monetary fine. To her son. To invoke capital punishment for someone, he or she must have done something horrible in this judge's opinion. Since Lady Catelyn did not do something horrible in this judge's opinion, I did not sentence her to death.

:agree:

[locke and key]

Charge 1A: Innocent: as wife of liege lord of the north and ruler of winterfell in his stead, she is allowed to exercise northern law, and arresting tyrion on suspicion of the attempted murder of bran stark for custody and trial in the eyrie is part of this.

1B; Dismissed -as I believe lady stoneheart/UnCat is a different person to catelyn stark

2: Innocent- as I said in charge A as ruler of winterfell in ned's stead she was permitted to carry out justice of the north in eddards name, although lysa should be charged for this

3:Innocent- lady catelyn could only take this route and was un-aware of the clans presence

4:Innocent-these were lord tywins actions and decisions not hers

5; Guilty-although it was in her power as mother of robb stark, this was against his wishes

6;Innocent- although she may not have loved jon snow, there is nothing illegal in this and she gave him the protection and food, water and home he was entitled to in her care

7: dismissed see 1b

8 A&B: dissmissed see 1B

9: dismissed not enough information about the condition of podrick payne is known

Innocent;as the only appropriate charge would be a prison sentence which was already fulfiilled through her house arrest in riverrun at the beginning of ASOS

[Lion of Judah]

Lady Catelyn Stark of Winterfell, on this day Monday March 11th judges of this court find you:

Guilty on count 1a-(Kidnapping of Tyrion Lannister)

No Judgement rendered on count 1b(Kidnapping of one Petyr Frey for reason of insanity)

Not Guilty on count 2-(Miscarriage of Justice)

Not Guilty on count 3-(Reckless Endangerment)

Not Guilty on count 4-(Inciting riots/chaos/war)

Guilty on count 5-(Treason)

Not Guilty on count 6-(Child Neglect)

No Judgement rendered on count 7(Attempted murder of one Podrick Payne for reason of insanity)

No Judgement rendered on count 8a(Murder of one Petyr Frey for reason of Insanity)

No Judgement rendered on count 8b(Murder of one Merret Frey for reason of insanity)

No Judgement rendered on count 9(Assault of one Podrick Payne for reason of insanity)

Lady Catelyn Stark of Winterfell, judges of this court sentence you to pay a monetary fine of 1(one) gold dragon to victim Tyrion Lannister as compensation for the hardships he endured while your captive. We sentence you to six months imprisonment to be served with the Silent Sisters, you shall be credited for time served while confined at Riverrun and caring for your Lord father Hoster Tully.

After overwhelming objections by judges of this court on various charges against Lady Catelyn Stark in relation to Lady Stoneheart. This court has rendered No Judgement on the charges in question and deem Lady Catelyn as legally insane and not accountable to the criminal acts while being possessed or controlled by Lady Stoneheart. This court orders that Lady Stoneheart be turned over immediately to the Citadel where she will be confined and treated for her current ailments until she be deemed fit to return to Westerosi society.

Final vote tally:

Count 1a- 18 guilty, 12 not guilty, 1 dismissed

Count 2- 13 guilty, 14 not guilty, 4 dismissed

Count 3- 10 guilty, 20 not guilty, 1 dismissed

Count 4-6 guilty, 18 not guilty, 6 dismissed

Count 5- 23 guilty, 4 not guilty, 3 dismissed

Count 6- 1 guilty, 24 no guilty, 5 dismissed

Counts 1b, 7, 8a, 8b, 9 (No judgement rendered)

This court is now adjourned.

[Pootie Tang]

Yay! A true victory for forensic Psychiatry!