Jump to content

The Stark family tree


joluoto

Recommended Posts

I am very interested in the Stark family tree, leading up to the novels. I asked earler about Ned's mother (Rickard's wife), but it seems no one really knows who she was (perhaps revealed in A World of Ice and Fire?). Now I wonder if Rickard had any siblings? My guess is no brothers (at least not brothers who made it to adulthood), but did he have sisters and who did they marry? I have to guess Rickard did not have sisters due to their offspring not being discussed when Robb and Catelyn discussed the succession. Although I think Rickard not having siblings is really odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'd had my way, the Stark family tree would be vastly different. There would be no Catelyn Stark. But she rejected me. And I rejected her husband one day in Kings Landing. And I mean to tear her whole family down as my vengeance.

:lmao: Well maybe if your finger wasn't so little. It must be because of all those mud pies you wolfed down.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you did once for Cat. But to bad she used you and threw you away like trash. Because that's all you are

Ironic you call me trash. That's what Eddard must have felt like in his final moments on the steps of Baelor when he threw away his honor. He wore that honor like armor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess this is off-topic, but this thread has raised an issue that I haven't ever considered. LF may want some serious revenge against the Freys for murdering Cat, particularly considering the lack of dignity with which they treated her body.

In all his scheming, he probably thought that Catelyn Stark would avoid physical harm during the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'd had my way, the Stark family tree would be vastly different. There would be no Catelyn Stark. But she rejected me. And I rejected her husband one day in Kings Landing. And I mean to tear her whole family down as my vengeance.

I have to say, writing responses as if you are actually Littlefinger cracks me up. Thanks for the laughs. :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very interested in the Stark family tree, leading up to the novels. I asked earler about Ned's mother (Rickard's wife), but it seems no one really knows who she was (perhaps revealed in A World of Ice and Fire?). Now I wonder if Rickard had any siblings? My guess is no brothers (at least not brothers who made it to adulthood), but did he have sisters and who did they marry? I have to guess Rickard did not have sisters due to their offspring not being discussed when Robb and Catelyn discussed the succession. Although I think Rickard not having siblings is really odd.

I think you've hit on something important Joluoto. All the other houses have elaborate genealogies that connect them with other houses. In many cases it explains whose side a certain character or family is loyal to. This can be quite significant, as in the case of Jeyne Westerling, who marries Robb but her family is still connected to the Lannisters and their bannermen. The Freys have elaborate connections throughout the Riverlands, the west and the Vale. And the frickin' genealogy of the nearly extinct Targaryens is like a book unto itself.

The Starks are Lords Paramount in the north, and one would think they would have daughters, aunts, younger sons and so on who had married into other prominent families in the north, and at least a few marriages to other Families Paramount from throughout the realm. This is after all the coin of power in Westeros - you 'seal the deal' of alliances by marriage.

You might observe that the Starks inspire loyalty by a different method - by being honourable and dutiful to their vassals. The petty lords of the North see it as being in their best interests to have a Stark in Winterfell. Still, they should shore that up by marriage as much as possible and it shows a singular lack of foresight that they haven't.

If you want to look at the question in a different way, it would help to ask what is the literary purpose. I think that's more easily answered. GRRM wanted to create the Stark children as isolated orphans, not just sympathetic characters but pitiable ones. He really likes to crank up the emotional investment the reader makes in the characters to 11. Having a bunch of aunts and uncles that they could turn to would lessen the impact of that, and the character arcs that the children go through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...