martianmister

Now that they do elect kings, rulers of Dorne and Iron Islands have reasons to accept Bran's rule. They have a chance to be elected the king of six kingdoms and rule all of the realm.

Why does it matter that he can't have children, if we're talking about an elective monarchy? Doesn't that make him an even better choice?

I'm pretty sure Bran is going to be the king in the south.

New cycle. Targaryen progeny will rise in the north as the Kings beyond the Wall, Little Council with "little men" will eventually be a center of corruption, Drogon will return, etc.

She could name Gendry or his progeny as her heir.

Daredevil.

So, that's why the books' 75 percent is all about politics and intrigue?

I think it's obvious that none of the lords had any respect for Edmure and Sansa was trying to stop her uncle from ashaming himself.

I've been thinking about it and now I'm sure they're just hypocrites.

Truth is, whole King's Landing tragedy isn't a world-shattering event to our heroes as most viewers assumed. We already see Jon and Tyrion's faces, it was something bad for them but nothing world shattering. Tyrion was more interested in his siblings' well-being and only rebelled against her after finding his siblings' dead bodies. Jon and Davos proclaimed "we won, war is over," they wanted to look forward. Jon killed her to protect his siblings and himself, not to avenge fleabottom. Even Arya was not that affected by it.

What are you talking about? We see them living in what's left behind of King's Landing.

I believe Jon did it better.

Starkporn.

Which bastard done it better?

Well, it's destroyed now.