Jump to content

Does the North want the Starks back?


Jose Stark

Recommended Posts

The northern houses want the Starks back but not as much as they want the Boltons out. Everyone knows Ramsay is a psychopath and most know or suspect Roose's involvement in the RW. The northern houses will rally around the first "Stark" to appear alongside a direwolf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im the biggest supporter of the Stark but do the northern lords want them back at Winterfell in command of the North? Yea they are honorable and beloved but their foolness lead to them putting the entire north in civil war a s it seems like to big an effort to put a Stark back in Winterfell

I just think at this point some of them want the Boltons and Freys out of the North and call it a day....

What do you think?

Have u not read a dance with dragons because that a big point in it. Not to be dick but you should read all the books before u ask dumb questions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can look at umbers, even greatjon is prisoner, half of them accept boltons...

Boltons will never rule north entirely... If Roose thinks he can rule all of them, he is really fool...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can look at umbers, even greatjon is prisoner, half of them accept boltons...

Boltons will never rule north entirely... If Roose thinks he can rule all of them, he is really fool...

Pretty sure Roose isn't going to be ruling anything after the upcoming battle. We may not have a Stark back at that point, but Roose won't have a head so it will be a turnover in power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure it also says in aSoS that the common folk in the north didn't have to look over their shoulders when the wolves ruled.

From who's POV was this from?

We know that the Boltons get up to despicable acts, that the Umbers practice first night and that Jorah was selling people into slavery. We also know that in the last 18 years the people of the North have been involved in 3 major wars, 2 of which were partially started by the Starks and we also know that Balon Greyjoy targeted the North for Ned taking his son.

There are plenty of reasons why some may be happy in a change of leadership, the main reason why the Starks may get their power back is more down to Roose's heir being a complete sociopath than Stark greatness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They undeniably do. A Stark, any Stark, is what they want

Even Rooses key "support", Lady Dustin is extremely suspect. Hell, one of her main reason to not like the Starks is because she wanted to be one of them. Theon, whether you call him hostage or ward, also wants to be a Stark-must be something in the water ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From who's POV was this from?

We know that the Boltons get up to despicable acts, that the Umbers practice first night and that Jorah was selling people into slavery. We also know that in the last 18 years the people of the North have been involved in 3 major wars, 2 of which were partially started by the Starks and we also know that Balon Greyjoy targeted the North for Ned taking his son.

There are plenty of reasons why some may be happy in a change of leadership, the main reason why the Starks may get their power back is more down to Roose's heir being a complete sociopath than Stark greatness.

I just re-read and I don't remember, but I'll try and find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From who's POV was this from?

We know that the Boltons get up to despicable acts, that the Umbers practice first night and that Jorah was selling people into slavery. We also know that in the last 18 years the people of the North have been involved in 3 major wars, 2 of which were partially started by the Starks and we also know that Balon Greyjoy targeted the North for Ned taking his son.

There are plenty of reasons why some may be happy in a change of leadership, the main reason why the Starks may get their power back is more down to Roose's heir being a complete sociopath than Stark greatness.

Try showing both sides of the story.

Roose did all he could to hide his activities from Ned

Ned went to deal justice to Jorah. Jorah also only got to sell a small number to the slavers-its not like it was a business

Who said that about the Umbers again?

Wars were brought and forced on them. At Roberts rebellion, it wasnt only Brandon Stark who died, but Ethan Glover and his other companions. Id say the houses of the North were baying for justice

It was from Bran POV, but the words were that of a common man, whos fire and food they shared

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the present Starks did commit some political follies, btu the fact remains that according to ADWD, the NOrthern LOrds loved the Starks. Furthermore, the Starks have been successfully ruling the North for THOUSANDS of years, they have rukes through multiple wars, winters, and conquerers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Roose isn't going to be ruling anything after the upcoming battle. We may not have a Stark back at that point, but Roose won't have a head so it will be a turnover in power.

You remember Ramsey is Roose's "trueborn" heir at this moment, right?

Which means if Roose dies, Ramsey is the new Lord of the Dreadfort and Warden of the North.

How's THAT for nightmare fuel?

I know it's true Ramsey probably won't be able to hang on to the North for long.... remember how unhappy everyone was at his treatment of "Arya Stark." The people still love the Starks. Now he doesn't even have her anymore. Without the Stark connection, Ramsey's gonna have to rely on sheer TERROR to maintain his grip on power....which he will relish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...