Masonity Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Not if you are a solo killer. But teamed, maybe. Only no, because gert Zar is the only combination where it makes any sense at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 You are around for day end worst ways then? 19:30 of my local. I definitely will be around. In no way i am going to kill SENP last night . The only player who maybe i can influence as a scum and is not very experienced . There is no way i will kill him . Partnerships, good sir, partnerships. If you are evil, you evidently have no voice in choosing nightkills but follow your much more experienced partner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brAnthelAstgreenseer Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 I think you guys are playing me bad . This just lifted VPI on Gert according to you , Malc is still by your strong side . Gert and Zar also could have done this . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brAnthelAstgreenseer Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 19:30 of my local. I definitely will be around. Partnerships, good sir, partnerships. If you are evil, you evidently have no voice in choosing nightkills but follow your much more experienced partner. This is a suicide mission if i allow a kill like SENP over the four of you . Eliminating random players whose choice you cannot depend on is better for the four of you . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 This is a suicide mission if i allow a kill Are you pretend to be unique? I never seen a newbie player who vetoed more experienced partner to kill whoever he wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masonity Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Honestly, we'd be more likely to see you as weak willed easily led half players and would try to keep you alive unless we had no non-suspicious experienced players to kill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Full list:Gert/Zar - possible.Gert/Masonity - doubtful, would kill me or Zar.Gert/Malc - actually, possible, I'd kill Stannis over my sheep Zar.Gert/brAn - doubtful, would kill me or Zar.Zar/Masonity - impossible, would kill Gert.Zar/Malc - impossible, would kill Gert.Zar/brAn - slightly possible, might go for a wild kill.Masonity/Malc - impossible, would kill Gert.Masonity/brAn - doubtful, would kill Gert or Zar.Malc/brAn - actually, somewhat possible, but unlikely, I'd hardly lynch brynden in this scenario, I'd need him as hide for Bran. Any corrections? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zar Lannister Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Entertaining the idea that a tram with me FM would kill Stannis of all players is pretty cute, Masonity but why I woukd killing a pretty easily lynchable coasting n00b that was freaking out everybody when me FM could've killed any of the others and keep a player a lot more swayable in LiLo?I think at this point its fairly obvious its Masonity with somebody else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Entertaining the idea that a tram with me FM would kill Stannis of all players is pretty cute, Masonity but why I woukd killing a pretty easily lynchable coasting n00b that was freaking out everybody when me FM could've killed any of the others and keep a player a lot more swayable in LiLo?I think at this point its fairly obvious its Masonity with somebody else.With whom?Rather weak post, Zar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zar Lannister Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Is hypoGetrude!scum keeping me alive because I've been fake symping her? :dunce: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zar Lannister Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 With whom?Rather weak post, Zar.Would if I knew right now, but entertaining the idea of killing the weakest slot in the game when a team with me in it can reap off the benefit of it with less experienced players is definitely not my style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masonity Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 I guess I could see gert malc or gert bran wanting us both alive. I've been her biggest symp but I guess I could buy her seeing you as a symp too, or at least a sympathetic player to her personally. I prefer Zar/gert though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masonity Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Malc why do you have gert/Zar as possible but gert/bran as would kill you? That means you are saying the Stan choice would come from Zar not gert right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Malc why do you have gert/Zar as possible but gert/bran as would kill you?That means you are saying the Stan choice would come from Zar not gert right?Gert/Zar would be ok with bran lynch (which was logical inertia choice after brynden lynch), but Gert/bran would want an easy scapegoat, so Stannis alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masonity Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Gert/Zar would be ok with bran lynch (which was logical inertia choice after brynden lynch), but Gert/bran would want an easy scapegoat, so Stannis alive.Yeah. You are right there. Stan pretty much clears bran. Which also meta makes Zar likely if we believe the mods would ignore random to try to pair a new and old together as a learning exercise. Remember Zars slot started as a newbie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertrude Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Oh Jesus Christ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Oh Jesus Christ. That's all you could say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertrude Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Which also meta makes Zar likely if we believe the mods would ignore random to try to pair a new and old together as a learning exercise. Remember Zars slot started as a newbie. Why would the mods ignore random? More specifically, why would you assume the mods would ignore random? No Malc, that's not all but it was my first reaction. I like the direction of your partner analysis, but I don't follow the reasoning and it seems a bit arbitrary and based on you assigning motives to players that may or may not be backed up by game play. My first instinct, of course, is Masonity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertrude Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 My gut is also telling me that brAnthel should be less suspicious for this kill but I am not sold on that yet. What he's saying is true - brAnthel needs a Stannis in end game. Even if he's got a more experienced partner, it's too easy for the tide to turn of the innos get a lucky break and then there is no where left to turn except for brAnthel. This close to end game it seems like an unnecessary risk. Another reason I could still be alive, aside from sowing chaos, is that my death cements in people's mind that I was an innocent and give my thoughts more weight. I was going after Masonity the last two days. By leaving me alive he discredits me. It's a more risky move, but has a better payoff. And it's just more fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMalcolm Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 I like the direction of your partner analysis, but I don't follow the reasoning and it seems a bit arbitrary and based on you assigning motives to players that may or may not be backed up by game play. My first instinct, of course, is Masonity. Argue then. It's somewhat interesting that both you and Zar still try to work in terms of persons not pairings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.