Pilusmagnus Posted September 15, 2014 Author Share Posted September 15, 2014 The accents in English are awesome. In France, we only have northern accent, parisian accent, regular accent, southern accent, Québéc accent and créole accent (from the former african colonies). Well we actually have more, but people in France tend to try and hide their accent and all go for regular accent. This is so wrong. The diversity you have in English is much more cultural. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night's_King Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 The accents in English are awesome. In France, we only have northern accent, parisian accent, regular accent, southern accent, Québéc accent and créole accent (from the former african colonies). Well we actually have more, but people in France tend to try and hide their accent and all go for regular accent. This is so wrong. The diversity you have in English is much more cultural. In Germany, we have tons of different accents. Some are awesome, while others are really annoying. And I think it's the same with British accents. There are some I like and some that I just hate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilusmagnus Posted September 15, 2014 Author Share Posted September 15, 2014 The fact is in France, having an accent is considered shameful, as an heritage of the Renaissance when the Parisian French was considered "true French". In France, it would seem utterly ridiculous to make a fantasy world where southerners would have Marseillais accent while northerners would have chti accent.That's what I envy of english-speakers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night's_King Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 The fact is in France, having an accent is considered shameful, as an heritage of the Renaissance when the Parisian French was considered "true French". In France, it would seem utterly ridiculous to make a fantasy world where southerners would have Marseillais accent while northerners would have chti accent. That's what I envy of english-speakers. This was never a problem in Germany. We have so many accents because, well, Germany isn't a real country that long and is composed of many small countries, and almost every country had it's own accent. Some even had more than a few. At the turn of the 18th century we looked like this. After we kicked your asses in 1871 (please don't take this too seriously :D ) we looked like this. But the accents remained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilusmagnus Posted September 15, 2014 Author Share Posted September 15, 2014 After we kicked your asses in 1871 You want to talk bout Bir Hakeim? :box: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night's_King Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 You want to talk bout Bir Hakeim? :box: That was really great. And impressive. The odds remind me a bit of the Battle of Wizna. But I still think that Hitlers invasion of France was one of the most impressive campaigns in military history. I mean, you had one of the strongest armies in the whole world and the German forces beat you in five weeks. But I think we're derailing the topic a little :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wise Fool Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Yeah, they do. West is described as knowing the northern tongue several times and has to translate for others in Book 2. Then there is Kantic. Not sure about Styria though. I think they just have accents. I'm re-reading Best Served Cold, and there's a point where Shivers's thought-bubbles reference too many big "Styrian words" (paraphrase mine. Apologies) so I'm guessing there's an actual Styrian language. Though, how different it is from the common tongue of the Union or not is anyone's guess - after all, to a Northman, Styrian and Union might be equally incomprehensible, even if they're the same language but with different accents or two related languages that are nevertheless equally difficult for a non-native speaker.. Also, and this is just an aside, I find Monza's experience with opium to be remarkably similar to my own experience with synthesized pain medications. At first you take them just for the pain, because some mysterious medical authority suggests you do so, but they feel so damn good that eventually you find you want them all the time or even, your body feels "pain" frequently enough that you reach for your "medication" anyway. It's also remarkably similar to Cosca's experience with alcoholism - both his own descriptions of his obsession, and that of mean-spirited critics like Morveer, prove eerily true. The theme of addiction is strong enough in BSC that it makes me wonder, because most readers and reviewers are keen enough to point out themes of violence, revenge, betrayal and the like in the book while these other themes are not so much, even though they're entirely present and - in my estimation - more powerful goads and drives for all characters (not simply the ones with substance abuse issues). What it makes me wonder about is whether Joe Abercrombie himself has any personal experience with the subject or, if, like any good writer, is simply capable enough to research and/or empathize/extrapolate enough to write about it in a way that is meaningful to those of us with such issues. If the latter, you see, it provides hope that as a writer, I don't actually have to HAVE any personal experience with subjects I like to write about (i.e., cannibalism) to be writin' about 'em. Otherwise, though, I have knives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilusmagnus Posted September 16, 2014 Author Share Posted September 16, 2014 Does your message contain spoilers for books 3, 4, 5 and 6? Can I read it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Gilfellon Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Post mentions theme, character names. Not what happens plotwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaimereborn Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I just couldn't get into this, despite really wanting to. Found the characters too cold and unlikeable to be really engaging, and found the prose a bit too 'young adult' rather than 'adult' in places. The atmosphere of the book maybe just wasn't what I was looking for - it just didn't have the subtlety or melancholy of fantasies like ASOIAF. It also seemed to enjoy gore too much for the sake of it and not for any seeming relevance or literary power, which ended up cheapening a lot of the violence for me and revealing too much the presence of an author striving for a 'gritty' style, and less so a believable world that I could throw myself into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceluby Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I just couldn't get into this, despite really wanting to. Found the characters too cold and unlikeable to be really engaging, and found the prose a bit too 'young adult' rather than 'adult' in places. The atmosphere of the book maybe just wasn't what I was looking for - it just didn't have the subtlety or melancholy of fantasies like ASOIAF. It also seemed to enjoy gore too much for the sake of it and not for any seeming relevance or literary power, which ended up cheapening a lot of the violence for me and revealing too much the presence of an author striving for a 'gritty' style, and less so a believable world that I could throw myself into. How far did you even get? I ask because I would never use any of the descriptors you used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaimereborn Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 How far did you even get? I ask because I would never use any of the descriptors you used. around halfway in before i gave up :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilusmagnus Posted September 16, 2014 Author Share Posted September 16, 2014 The books feature pricky but sympathetic characters, are filled with dark humor and are written like a 9gag comment. That is EXACTLY what is great about them. You've been disappointed by what you were supposed to expect. New casting members came to mind :Ryan Gosling as Harding Grim (who else?)Peter Mensah as the Gurkhish ambassadorFinn Jones or Freddie Highmore as Crown Prince LadislaSebastian Stan as Practical SeverardNatalia Tena as Practical VitariJoseph Gatt as Practical FrostGuillaume Briat as the King of the Union (just google his name or watch this : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCAM1kR2xQM&index=1&list=PLKiS5UCHfv_A4cuqnSlYEuBNfAFIr2EIB or that : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0pLFDpRNTw) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night's_King Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I agree that there are very few characters I sympathized with at first. I think I only rooted for West and The Bloody Nine at the beginning. It really took me a while to read threw the first book. The character developement is great in the second book. I loved it. The characters really grew into more likable persons.And then, everything changed with the third book. I really wanted to burn Abercrombies house at the end. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Cosca Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 The books feature pricky but sympathetic characters, are filled with dark humor and are written like a 9gag comment. That is EXACTLY what is great about them. You've been disappointed by what you were supposed to expect. New casting members came to mind :Ryan Gosling as Harding Grim (who else?)Peter Mensah as the Gurkhish ambassadorFinn Jones or Freddie Highmore as Crown Prince LadislaSebastian Stan as Practical SeverardNatalia Tena as Practical VitariJoseph Gatt as Practical FrostGuillaume Briat as the King of the Union (just google his name)Rose Leslie as Practical VitariEva Green as Carlot dan EiderNatalie Dormer as Princess Terez Jonathan Rhys Meyers as Prince LadislaRichard Griffiths (RIP) as the King of the Union Thomas Brodie Sangster as Malaqus QuaiGary Oldman as Yoru SulfurCiaran Hinds as Zacharus (in his Aberforth costume)Ian Whyte as Bremer dan GorstViggo Mortenssen as The DogmanClive Standen as Black DowAlfie Allen as CalderKarl Urban as ScaleAiden Turner as Harding GrimClive Mantle as Tul Duru ThunderheadThats about it! Btw we have the same guy as the ambassador! Just googled him and its the same actor! Didn't knew his name though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo498 Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 Logan is sympathetic as long as he is not entering the berserk "Bloody Nine" stage...After reading "Heroes" I still think everybody is trying way to hard to be witty, including the author. Still, it is overall much better written than your average stuff and entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilusmagnus Posted September 16, 2014 Author Share Posted September 16, 2014 Eva Green as Carlot dan EiderJonathan Rhys Meyers as Prince LadislaGary Oldman as Yoru SulfurIan Whyte as Bremer dan GorstViggo Mortenssen as The DogmanKarl Urban as ScaleClive Mantle as Tul Duru ThunderheadThats about it!These ones are pretty good. Though Clive Mantle would do a better Threetrees. And Ralph Ineson is the perfect Black Dow though I envisaged him first as Logen. In which case, Clive Standen is a good Logen.But Guillaume Briat is the King of the Union. This one and Ewan McGregor as West are not debatable. Also, Clementine from TWD as Cathil. Just extract her from the game and make her play that girl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceluby Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 I agree that there are very few characters I sympathized with at first. I think I only rooted for West and The Bloody Nine at the beginning. It really took me a while to read threw the first book. The character developement is great in the second book. I loved it. The characters really grew into more likable persons.And then, everything changed with the third book. I really wanted to burn Abercrombies house at the end. :D I was mostly drawn in by Sand dan Glokta in the early parts of the book. Not sure if I 'sympathized' with him, but I did like the character the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Cosca Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 These are pretty good. Though Clive Mantle would do a better Threetrees. And Ralph Ineson is the perfect Black Dow though I envisaged him first as Logen. In which case, Clive Standen is a good Logen.But Guillaume Briat is the King of the Union. This one and Ewan McGregor as West are not debatable. Also, Clementine from TWD as Cathil. Just extract her from the game and make her play that girl.I googled your King of the Union and it was a pretty good one aswell! You can make the news guy from the tv show Rome as the King too. I don't have a solid picture of Threetrees on my mind but he sounds like Ciaran Hinds but has a totally diferent look. Your West is pretty solid aswell, now I'll have Ewan McGregor on my mind whenever I re read the books! Oh and Cathil is Maisie Williams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilusmagnus Posted September 16, 2014 Author Share Posted September 16, 2014 Maisie would have been the perfect Cathil but she's too old now.I understand how you feel about West. Since I thought Morgan Freeman could be Yulwei, I hear his voice when he speaks. And I agree, if you were not interested in the characters in book one, (I was, but you may not) it gets better later. Particularly whenLogen calls Jezal a brother for the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.