glamourweaver Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 On a scale of 1-10, how likely do you think it is that Bloodraven poisoned Rhaegal (son of Daeron II) in order to protect the Realm/Iron Throne/legitimacy of House Targaryen, and assure the succession for a strong enough (and sane enough) King capable of holding the realm together against the Blackfyres? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bironic Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I think BR could have profited from a weak king Rhaegal, being the hand for 12 years for another rather weak king (Aerys I), and did quite a good job. So I say 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mithras Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Bloodraven or Aemon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RumHam Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 He choked on an eel didn't he? I guess it could have been the strangler, but then they probably would have realized as they did with Joffrey's death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 I wouldn't call it very likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glamourweaver Posted November 21, 2014 Author Share Posted November 21, 2014 Bloodraven or Aemon? Aemon would be a big character twist. Bloodraven is well established at this point as being the era's resident "hard man of hard decisions" who routinely sacrifices his own honor for "the greater good." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.