Jump to content

Guest right breach case:the Tyrells


Recommended Posts

I cannot keep but wonder:is Joffrey's poisoning an outright breach of Guest Right or,taking into account the reasons behind it,can be considered an act of self-defence?

It has definitely not received the uproar the Red Wedding had(quite the contrary ;)) and even G.R.R.Martin hasn't treated them as harshly as the Freys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose you could argue that once Margaery and Joffrey were married, the Tyrells were no longer guests any more than the Lannisters are.

This would make it kinslaying, which is equally as bad, but no the Tyrells were still guest and violated the right. If Margaery was involved then she played a role/broke three of the sacred Traditions: kinslaying, kingslaying and guest right violation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was breaking guest right, as that works both ways.

It was kinslaying, after they were wed.

It was regicide, according to the belief that Joffrey was Robert's heir.

Garlan didn't care. Garlan took care of his baby sister.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would make it kinslaying, which is equally as bad, but no the Tyrells were still guest and violated the right. If Margaery was involved then she played a role/broke three of the sacred Traditions: kinslaying, kingslaying and guest right violation.

Kinslaying isn't as bad as guest right violation. Kinslaying happens all the time whereas guest right violation is rare and despised by everyone in Westeros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...