65536ob Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 how do you think the wealth of westeros compares with that of essos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJR the PR of TaFW Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 essos kicks butt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Consigliere Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Essos appears to be wealthier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Mac Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Essosi nobles are probably richer as a whole. Especially some of the slave masters in Slaver's bay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Dragonstone Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Essos has more wealth, but the average quaity of life in Westeros seems a lot better.(Although the Free cities might be better than most of what we've seen around Slaver Bay) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Señor de la Tormenta Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 I think westeros is still a medieval society, where the size of your land, and the amount of people they can fead is the messure of ritchness. Essos is all about gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amanofhonor Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 It's like comparing medieval Europe to the medieval Middle-East. The east was richer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrogo Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 I think essos is richer. So much trading going on there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladytiger Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Aye, the "cheesemongers" and "cheese lords" of Essos are certainly wealthier than some of the Westerosi lords. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin Manderly Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Essos is much wealthier. The city of Qarth alone is a couple of times wealthier than all of Westeros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCasualObserver Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 And yet Essos seems to have undeniably poorer armies. Save for the unsullied, all fighting forces we've seen have either been fickle sellsword companies or press ganged slave armies without any real taste for combat. Even the unsullied are acknowledged as lacking the strength and elan of Western Knights.The disparity isn't true in their historical counterparts - Byzantine, Turkish and Saracen armies often proved to be more than a match for traditional Western armies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jojens Mojjo Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 And yet Essos seems to have undeniably poorer armies. Save for the unsullied, all fighting forces we've seen have either been fickle sellsword companies or press ganged slave armies without any real taste for combat. Even the unsullied are acknowledged as lacking the strength and elan of Western Knights.The disparity isn't true in their historical counterparts - Byzantine, Turkish and Saracen armies often proved to be more than a match for traditional Western armies.And yet Essos seems to have undeniably poorer armies. Save for the unsullied, all fighting forces we've seen have either been fickle sellsword companies or press ganged slave armies without any real taste for combat. Even the unsullied are acknowledged as lacking the strength and elan of Western Knights.The disparity isn't true in their historical counterparts - Byzantine, Turkish and Saracen armies often proved to be more than a match for traditional Western armies.:::Cough::: Dothraki ::::Cough:::: :bang: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Napyura Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Braavos wins overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Mac Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 Qarth wins overall.Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteWalder Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 old money vs new money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCasualObserver Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 :::Cough::: Dothraki ::::Cough:::: :bang:But they're not wealthy or cultured - they are analogous to the mongols and Huns, not Turks or Saracens. My point was that if Quarth and the rest easily outstrip Westeros in terms of wealth, why can't they field armies that are worth a damn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin Manderly Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 And yet Essos seems to have undeniably poorer armies. Save for the unsullied, all fighting forces we've seen have either been fickle sellsword companies or press ganged slave armies without any real taste for combat. Even the unsullied are acknowledged as lacking the strength and elan of Western Knights.The disparity isn't true in their historical counterparts - Byzantine, Turkish and Saracen armies often proved to be more than a match for traditional Western armies.Aside from the knights and men-at-arms belonging to wealthy houses, Westerosi armies mainly consist out of poorly-equipped peasant levies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GallowsKnight Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 I think it varies among the two. Westeros has some spectacularly wealthy Lords. The Lannisters of Casterly Rock. The Hightowers and the Redwyne. These guys are both rich in liquid assets as wealth as land.Paxter Redwyne has 1000 mechants ships. Five times the number of Xaro for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Dragonstone Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 I think it varies among the two. Westeros has some spectacularly wealthy Lords. The Lannisters of Casterly Rock. The Hightowers and the Redwyne. These guys are both rich in liquid assets as wealth as land.Paxter Redwyne has 1000 mechants ships. Five times the number of Xaro for example.Xaro is just one person. The Thirteen have 1000 ships. The guild of Spicers 1200-1300, and the Tourmaline Brotherhood 800, all of which are a part of Qarth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GallowsKnight Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 Aside from the knights and men-at-arms belonging to wealthy houses, Westerosi armies mainly consist out of poorly-equipped peasant levies.Watch out Ero has a half a dozen quotes to counter this.But the majority of Westerosi armies aren't poorly-equipped peasant levies. They are semi-professional peasant landowners who are expected to supply their own equipment and serve their lord in times of war. And from many of the description the have their own mail armour, as well as helms, pikes etc. Not poorly equipped at all.Xaro is just one person. The Thirteen have 1000 ships. The guild of Spicers 1200-1300, and the Tourmaline Brotherhood 800, all of which are a part of Qarth.Just like Paxter Redwyne is one person. One person who has many ships (remember 1000+200warships) as a Government system (the Thirteen) or two trading guilds likely made of many members.I put forward Paxter Redwyne might be wealthier than any single individual in Qarth. Just collectively they have more wealthier merchants than westeros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.