[Book Spoilers] Selyse and Shireen
#1
Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:52 AM
#2
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:37 AM
Edited by Tourniquet, 10 April 2012 - 08:37 AM.
#3
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:47 AM
#4
Posted 10 April 2012 - 09:01 AM
And yes, Queen Selyse does exist. But apparently she is not Mel's most devoted follower.
And the Queen's and King's Men vying for Stannis's ear is actually an interesting background struggle. I guess they will have to do this eventually as Stannis/Davos/Mel will have virtually nothing to do in season 3 if they truly end up splitting ASoS into two seasons. They can only go to the Wall in season 4 - after the Red and the Purple Wedding.
And Shireen, well, she has to appear. If she's not there, Stannis cannot die/fake his death in ADwD/TWoW. Neither Selyse nor Melisandre could succeed him, but as soon as the news of Stannis's alleged demise reach the Wall, Shireen will be declared Queen. If Stannis has no heir, they would have to rewrite everything if the series even reaches this point of the story.
Edited by Lord Varys, 10 April 2012 - 09:02 AM.
#5
Posted 10 April 2012 - 09:28 AM
Yes, the power struggle between the King and Queen's men is interesting in the book but it was basically a struggle between fervent followers of R'hollor and those not incline to that belief. We have already been shown the beginnings of this divide between Matthos and Davos (as a struggle between elders and young) which shows we don't really need to include the idea of King's Men and Queen's Men to illustrate the divide.
If they go the storyline that Stannis fakes his own death (which isn't even verified in the books yet), they still don't have to show Shireen. Just saying he has a daughter is enough to point out that he has a possible heir. We didn't see Stannis last season yet we were told he existed and that Robert had a true heir in him.
I have to admit though that I was very interested in seeing what sort of homely woman they'd make as Stannis' wife and how they might have envisioned greyscale to look.
#6
Posted 10 April 2012 - 09:53 AM
The 'conflict' between Matthos and Davos Seaworth does not in the slightest resemble the quarrel between King's Men and Queen's Men. Davos and Matthos talked about religion and atheism, not about two different religions. Further, it does not seem that Matthos/Davos would actually have a true quarrel over religious matters. It's evident that Matthos deeply loves his father, he is no substitute for Axell Florent or Selyse Florent Baratheon.
Stannis may not fake his death, but either somebody else faked his death (i.e. Ramsay), or he is dead. The next POV chapter at the Wall (most likely from Melisandre's POV) will feature Her Grace, Queen Shireen of House Baratheon, the First Of Her Name, etc. Selyse would be entirely stupid to ignore the news about her husband's death. If it's a lie, well and good, then Stannis will still be king. But if not, then Shireen must be declared Queen as soon as possible or their whole cause will crumble at once. Shireen might wear her crown only for a fortnight, but she will be queen.
#7
Posted 10 April 2012 - 10:26 AM
Lord Varys, on 10 April 2012 - 09:53 AM, said:
ADWD is book 5 in the series. We are only on season two of the show. We have already been told that ASOS will be split into two seasons. The adaptation of ADWD is years away. The audience knows Stannis has a wife. Not introducing her face doesn't change that and nor does it yet have any affect on how they choose to write Season 5/6. I don't agree that Selyse is an important political player in ADWD. What I got from her interactions with Jon Snow is that the nature of the wildlings is very difficult for those south of the wall to understand. I personally think it's important that the audience know that Shireen possibly exists, but if she does exist on the show I do not think there is any need to see her.
Quote
The very basic quarrel between the King's Men and the Queen's men is one based on religion. Even though Davos brings in the idea of atheism, the discussion between Davos and Matthos is still one about religion. The father and son can love each other deeply and still have that quarrel. I don't see the problem there.
Quote
I agree that if they follow this storyline it's probably necessary for Shireen to exist in the show. If they write her out now, then the butterfly effect will change a whole lot of things. We don't know if they've truly written her out. If they haven't, it still doesn't mean we have to see her at this time. Just know she exists is all that's necessary for viewers.
#8
Posted 10 April 2012 - 10:52 AM
#9
Posted 10 April 2012 - 11:31 AM
Remember, they have a budget. You have to pay a fulltime actor more than you do some glorified extra. So some characters have to wait.
#10
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:07 PM
#11
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:16 PM
Tourniquet, on 10 April 2012 - 08:37 AM, said:
Actually you are right, i assumed it was Selyse i am not sure if there was a daughter as well . Will have to rewatch the episode again.
#12
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:22 PM
Fredwin, on 10 April 2012 - 01:07 PM, said:
#13
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:34 PM
ghost the direwolf, on 10 April 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
I am positive Stannis leaves the ceremony with a "wife" (or at least a woman), that I took for Selyse. I don't think Selyse or Shireen are needed in this season. As pointed before, they don't play a huge role in ACOK (Shireen's main function is to offer us another regard on Dragonstone), and there actually are lots and lots of other people more interesting than them in this season in Westeros.
Not a huge fan of this episode, but I least I'm fine with them cut off the show this year.
#14
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:38 PM
Lord Varys, on 10 April 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:
And the Queen's and King's Men vying for Stannis's ear is actually an interesting background struggle. I guess they will have to do this eventually as Stannis/Davos/Mel will have virtually nothing to do in season 3 if they truly end up splitting ASoS into two seasons. They can only go to the Wall in season 4 - after the Red and the Purple Wedding.
Fredwin, on 10 April 2012 - 01:07 PM, said:
It sounds like there is no shireen. Mel says his wife has given him only still births, not still births and one daughter. selyse will be cast eventually i'm sure, but i doubt there will be a shireen
#15
Posted 10 April 2012 - 04:12 PM
All I am saying is: If the series progresses to a point where it will absolutely be necessary for Shireen to exist as an heir, I am sure they will come up with some sort of plot twist to make it happen. The way the series is written makes both the queen and Shireen irrelevant at the moment.
#16
Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:28 PM
If patchface is indeed the prophet of the drowned god and ends up being taken seriously at any point, or Shireen gets propped up to lead the cause in the possible event of Stanis' demise, how do you correct for that shit?
#17
Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:56 PM
GSP, on 10 April 2012 - 07:28 PM, said:
If patchface is indeed the prophet of the drowned god and ends up being taken seriously at any point, or Shireen gets propped up to lead the cause in the possible event of Stanis' demise, how do you correct for that shit?
GSP, on 10 April 2012 - 07:28 PM, said:
If patchface is indeed the prophet of the drowned god and ends up being taken seriously at any point, or Shireen gets propped up to lead the cause in the possible event of Stanis' demise, how do you correct for that shit?
Mago is far from a major character. His name is mentioned 7 times in the first 5 books (5 in GOT, 1 in SOS and 1 aDWD). He is Khal Jhaqos blood rider, which can be replaced by a new Dothraki in the show named Bago. You are acting like they kill some major player like Varys or something.
#18
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:01 PM
#19
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:10 PM
I'm not 'acting like' anything. I was just pointing out that the writers for the show don't seem to be bouncing their changes off of GRRM, who would have presumably gave them a heads up on that one if they did.
Yes, you can introduce 'Bago' in the place of 'Mago'. The same does not hold if Shireen and/or Patchface become a big deal. Or does it? How do you undo the fact that Stannis has no progeny with Shireen emerging as an important character, if that were to happen?
I can't remember the exact dialogue from the show, but Selse had given Stannis ONLY death or something like that. It seemed pretty explicit that Stannis had no children, not just no sons. Anybody able to confirm the dialogue?
Edited by GSP, 10 April 2012 - 08:12 PM.
#20
Posted 11 April 2012 - 12:44 AM
Stannis: I have a wife. I took a vow.
Melisandre: She’s sickly. Weak. Shut away in a tower. She disgusts you. And she’s given you nothing. No sons; only stillborns, only death. I will give you a son, my king.
Stannis: A son.







