Julia H.

Arya running into Rickon and Davos sounds like an exciting turn of events! It is true that Braavos to the North geographically may make more sense travel-wise, though other (Other?) circumstances may make is less possible at a given moment.

It was fun reading through this thread. I may be late to the party, but still... My predictions: 1) Jon will survive. I'm in the camp of simple survival instead of some dubious fire magic by Mel, but who knows... It is likely that he will be out of action for a while though. Yet, he could use that time for some esoteric mental exploration (a bit like Bran's coma dream in AGOT), perhaps he could magically explore the depth of the Winterfell crypts or the Far North or could get in touch with Bran or remember something really ancient. 2) Arya will meet Jeyne Poole in Bravoos and will travel back to Westeros as a result. In some manner, she will be reunited with both LS and Nymeria, and it will be, ultimately, a cathartic experience for her. 3) The Wall - or its magic - will fall, and the Others will get access to Westeros. 4) Sansa will find out the truth about LF. She will have an opportunity to escape from him, but she will decide to stay in the Vale instead because she will not want to leave SweetRobin without a protector. She will also decide to beat LF at his own game. It will take some time, but Sansa is a talented player and will be learning fast. 5) Howland Reed will finally make an appearance and we'll get some new hints concerning some of the secrets he is guarding. Hopes: 1) Shireen, Jojen, Tommen and Myrcella will survive. 2) Jamie (or someone else) will find a way to save Brienne from LS, and, one way or other, something good will happen to that girl finally. (Actually, I'm quite confident that she is going to live yet, but the second part seems unlikely.) 3) Both Jaime and JonCon realize (privately) that there is one last thing that they can do for Rhaegar (as in helping his real child), but it will cause conflicting feelings: Each of them will feel honour-bound to pay their perceived debt to Rhaegar, however, it would mean abandoning their current duties, and how could they possibly do that? They could reach opposing conclusions in the end. 4) The Blackfish will turn up again. Edmure and his family will be freed. 5) LS will find peace at last. Wishful thinking: 1) Val and Jon will be happily united in love. 2) Benjen will return alive and well. 3) The author will get rid of Euron as soon as narratively possible. 4) All mysteries will be explained. 5) The Daynes will actually play an important role.

Happy New Year, everyone! @Jez Bell, thank you for the call! Can I still join?

A Dame of Thrones (Or the life of Margaery Tyrell.)

Paws (The story of what happened on the shore.)

I think the Hound can be excluded. During the scene where he wants to persuade Arya to give him the gift of mercy, he tries to make her enraged enough to kill him by reminding her of how he killed Mycah and what he might have done to Sansa. If he had had a hand in the attempt on Bran's life and the arson in Winterfell, he would surely add this confession to the list in the scene, but he does not. Blount and Trant are certainly very likely suspects as middlemen, though in this case I must conclude that the planning must have been done by the catspaw as likely the most intelligent member of the gang. I really like this theory. Even if it does not get confirmed by GRRM, it is very well built up and plausible (though it would make me hate Mance Ryder). I also like the idea that the burning of the Winterfell Library at a time when rediscovering ancient knowledge would be essential has some further significance beyond being a mere diversion.

A pyrrhic victory at best.

Well, he managed to start a civil war and "disorder" in the whole realm as well as discord and disaster in his immediate family. Of course, he shouldn't allow his son "to be taken at will by another great house". But the attack on the Riverlands was not his only option.

It seems that Jaime didn't think of this option. (I guess as a Kingsguard Jaime himself might have needed permission from the King to leave King's Landing, but he could have sent some Lannister men at least.) Tywin probably didn't want to involve Jaime in this business though.

To be honest, this is an issue even if R+L=J is not true. I mean we know what people in-world believe about Rhaegar and Lyanna, and as long as they believe that, they should wonder, regardless of the hidden truth. It is possible that Ned arranged the journey home in such a way that Lyanna's bones and the baby would not be transported together or seen arriving anywhere at the same time, just so people would dissociate Jon from Lyanna.

They are "alike" at a superficial glance perhaps. Lyanna may well have seen the difference that was significant to her. (And no, Robert wasn't just "rumour".) There are certainly huge gaps in the story that we know. There is no evidence that Lyanna and Rhaegar didn't care about the war around them, there is no reason to believe that any of what happened had been their intention, that things did not go terribly wrong somewhere. Nor is there evidence that it all started as a romantic elopement story. (I have some ideas on that, and perhaps one day I'll have the time to do some research on those ideas and maybe write them into a post.) Their story is definitely not a happy one, the general outcome makes that much clear, and it couldn't be a "proper" love story given all the complications we know of. I don't think it means that it must have been something totally dark though, like the deliberate sacrifice of thousands of people for "the greater good". (If a prophecy is really to come true, I would expect it do so in a roundabout way, not as a character intends to fulfill it anyway.) Both Rhaegar and Lyanna deserve the benefit of the doubt until we find out what really happened. This is not a finished story, and the author may still have some secrets he has managed to keep.

What do you all think of this quote? Rowan is a spearwife from beyond the Wall, a wildling. Yet, she does not only know the Stark words, but she also feels such respect for "Lord Eddard's words" that she doesn't think Theon, after what he did, has the right to even say those words.

Some really cool observations in that post! Regarding the "white sister" idea, it was @bemused who suggested years ago that Val and Dalla - their joint names being reminiscent of Valhalla - could be sisters not by blood but by belonging to the same order of women practised in some kind of magic. Mance describes Dalla as wise, and she warns Jon about the use of sorcery. Val clearly has some special knowledge, and her white clothes were given to her by Dalla. I agree that there must have been some sort of communication (other than raiding) between wildlings and Northerners living close to the Wall through all these years. Somehow some of the wildlings learned the Common Tongue, after all. Some sort of trade may exist, and also, when someone gets into trouble with the law or the local lord, and does not fancy ending up on the Wall, crossing the Wall nearby can easily be an option. Marriage probably also happens sometimes.

Ah. That's something new. I can agree that Tywin could well be the greater danger, I even said somewhere above that Robert could be influenced by Ned whereas Cersei or Tywin could not. Of course, Robert could also be influenced by his love for Lyanna. Yet, I don't think it's something that Eddard can take for granted. That's why he notes Robert's ongoing hatred of long-dead Rhaegar. It is not healthy, and you never know whether it would be Robert's love of Lyanna or Robert's hatred of Rhaegar that would motivate him with regard to a son of theirs until you have seen him act. Some time before the crowning, Lyanna wept over Rhaegar's song, which introduces the motif of emotions. They may not have met before Harrenhal. I don't think it's a problem in itself, but there are obviously a lot of gaps in the story, whatever happened. Neither one is your ideal husband material, for sure. Apart from addiction, Robert also has an unhealthy, irrational degree of hatred of all things Targaryen, especially Rhaegar. I the modern world, he could seek therapy for several reasons. (He is not the only one though.) We see Robert act and speak on page. We learn his story, we can judge him for ourselves. We see his faults and his redeeming qualities. We can understand his problems. The same is not true of Rhaegar. Whatever we know of Rhaegar is very little and comes from other characters' more or less biased memories. I wouldn't say Rhagear was worse than Robert until we know of him at least as much as about Robert. We know very little of what happened, but I think it's a safe bet that the general outcome is not what Rhaegar must have been planning all along. There may have been many things that went wrong despite other plans and we don't know why. There must be a lot of factors which would influence our opinions about the characters living before the current storyline if we knew them.

Well, if you use fairy tale and romantic comedy as synonyms, that explains a lot. In a real fairy tale, the prince is definitely not married with two kids when he meets the heroine. A romantic comedy with its clichés is a different matter. (The story of Lyanna is neither though.) And since you brought up Romeo and Juliet, that's again neither a fairy tale nor a romantic comedy, and the hero is definitely not married with two kids when he meets the heroine. But we don't seem to be talking about the same things, so there is probably no point in continuing this line of conversation. Robert is not cruel but he has his faults. One of his faults is that he becomes irrational when it comes to Rhaegar, which Ned sees quite clearly. Even though Rhaegar has been dead for many years, Robert is still obsessed with killing him. In addition, he cannot get over having lost Lyanna. Finding a son of Rhaegar and Lyanna being raised secretly in the North could well trigger his thirst for revenge. He is a king and therefore he has power. One word of fury from him may seal Jon's fate even if Robert might regret that word later on. So do you think that with Robert's death it would suddenly be safe to reveal that Jon is Rhaegar's son? Of course not. Robert is not the only person in the realm who might want to harm a potential Targaryen heir. Taking the black may make it less likely that the young man will be used against the current regime by anyone, but can't someone still think that killing the dragonspawn would be even safer than having him on the Wall? Would someone like Tywin hesitate for a moment between choosing "relatively safe" and "absolutely safe"? Would Cersei shy away from ordering the death of anyone she just imagines as even remotely dangerous for her power? No. In the case of Robert, Ned could at least have some hope of influencing him. In the case of Tywin and Cersei and others, there would be no such hope. Jon, if his true parentage were discovered, would by no means be safe either before or after Robert's death, so his alleged safety somehow being an accomplished fact cannot be used to exclude him from any promises (broken or not broken) that Ned may have given to Lyanna. Perhaps we can agree that readers can only guess but, for the moment, cannot tell for sure what exactly Ned means by broken promises. It is not only that we don't know what exactly those promises (plural) were, we also don't know if Ned considers all his promises to a certain person broken or only some of them. Technically, it is also possible that he thinks of promises made to different persons, but what we do know is that Lyanna is the only specific person he recalls, on page, in connection with a promise.

Well, it is Juliet who is already married (to Romeo) when she is told to marry another man. That's a very different situation from Rhaegar being already married when she meets Lyanna (which you brought up above as a "fairy tale trope"). That somehow did not stop Cersei from sending assassins to the Wall. Rhaegar's son would be a personal issue for Robert, and, after all, it wasn't his choice to send Jon to the Wall. Yes, it was a way to keep Jon safe, but could Ned be sure? No. Well, Robert's death removed the danger from anyone Ned had sworn to protect from Robert. But we don't know what exactly the promise was (Ned actually thinks of promises) and which parts were broken, according to Ned.

Well, Lyanna is not exactly a lowborn girl, and I think this is a rather twisted version of a fairy tale trope. In a real fairy tale, the prince is not married, and we don't know that much about Elia not being worthy of Rhaegar, apart from Jon Con thinking so, but the reason he gives (Elia was sickly) is not the strongest one I can imagine. Ned is as reliable a narrator as it gets. I wouldn't just discount any evidence he gives until he is proven wrong. He has lots of reasons to think uncomfortably of Rhaegar, and especially so in light of RLJ. You may not care about your sister being with anyone, but Lyanna's disappearance with Rhaegar (which seems to be a pretty well established fact in world) was followed by a war, Ned's father and brother died, Lyanna died and left behind a son who would be in great danger if Robert should find out who he really is. After all, Robert still hates Rhaegar and he still hates (and fears) Targaryens, regardless of their age. The friendship between Ned and Robert has been tested by such issues. There is no way to be sure Jon would be safe if Robert found out that a son of Rhaegar was being raised in Winterfell.

Hm... how about Dany to Drogo? Also, Mellario to Prince Doran.

The quote above is a great catch, and yes, I agree that Jon is associated with the Ice Dragon. Of course, if the Ice Dragon association is significant here, all the others must be also significant. Hm... As @EggBlue said above, the Wall is a sort of Ice Dragon... But there is also this (Jon talking to Tycho, who has just mentioned dragons): Here he apparently wishes for a "traditional" fire dragon (the breath of the Ice Dragon is cold). Ah, those careless wishes heroes can make... That's something I've been also thinking about. Jon seems to be 100% Stark, 100% Northern, 100% ice, and this "iceness" goes beyond his upbringing as a Stark and simply having no knowledge of his other heritage. There is nothing to associate him with anything that is Southern. Ironically, Tyrion thinks there is nothing of his mother in him, but the same may just as well be true with regard to his father. His name is Snow, he has a white wolf, he follows the Old Gods, he is Lord Commander of the Night's Watch, the Wall is his. Yet, in the Night's Watch oath, we have this sentence: Also, this is what Qhorin tells Jon: It may not be exactly a balance, but there are suggestions here for fire being part of ice sometimes. Like, I don't know, if sometimes the road to west lies through the east, then perhaps sometimes the road to fire may lead through ice?

@AlaskanSandman Wow, it's amazing how much stuff you have brought up inspired by my observation that "a girl may like one kind of man and dislike another one". Would you call Ned a Targaryen loyalist? We know he does not think Rhaegar frequented brothels. He muses on this when he has just witnessed the fruit of Robert visiting a brothel. Here is someone who is not a Targaryen loyalist (and is close to Lyanna) comparing Robert and Rhaegar with regard to their sexual behaviour, pointing out a difference (rather than a similarity) between them and clearly having a higher opinion of Rhaegar in this respect. We don't know what or how much Lyanna knew about Rhaegar at various stages of her life, we don't know who talked about Rhaegar or who said what about him. He was the crown prince so not exactly a person who lived in obscurity. The amount or the origin of Lyanna's prior knowledge about Rhaegar can hardly be used as an argument for or against anything due to lack of information. We do know they met. Even if Lyanna somehow never heard anyone mention Rhaegar (let's suppose this for a moment), she could surely form an opinion of him when she saw him. Yes, first impressions can be wrong, Sansa is a good example of that. But it is totally possible to form an opinion on someone based on the first impression (see Sansa again). It is also possible to fall in love with someone without having a ton of information about the person. A dictionary to prove that a cheater is a cheater? No one in the books has ever called either man a "cheater". GRRM does not like labels, he presents his characters, their dilemmas and choices in a complex way. It is you who call them both cheaters and say it means Lyanna must have had the same opinion about them. But in fact, it is your opinion that you want to force on Lyanna, you are the one who puts the same label on two characters who are presented as very different persons in the books. Young Robert is not a "cheater" because prior to marriage or engagement, he simply has no one to cheat on. He does not "cheat" on his baseborn paramours, who cannot realistically expect him to be faithful, he just abandons one for the sake of another or because he's become bored by them. Yet, it's true that he cannot keep to one bed, meaning he has sex whenever and wherever he can, without any commitment. Lyanna thinks he will be like that later in life as well, because marriage will not change him, and she does not look forward to a life of marriage with such a man. Where on earth are we told that she had problems with this from a strictly moral viewpoint? Whoever in this feudal world thinks that a young, unmarried man having sex with and fathering bastards on common girls is morally wrong? Lyanna's observation could well mean perhaps that she, personally, does not want to smell the smell of other women on her husband day by day, she does not want to have to deal with bastard issues, she does not want her servant girls to turn into her rivals in her husband's bed and so on. The world may not think it's morally wrong, but a woman can still find it awfully inconvenient. You can call Rhaegar a cheater, but nothing that we know of Rhaegar suggests that his wife had to suffer any such issues due to her husband's pleasure-seeking activities. There is a lot we are not told. What exactly the relationships, the plans and game-changing circumstances were we are not told explicitly. We get hints and bits of information. We are never told that Lyanna loved Rhaegar. Perhaps she didn't. Some characters in world seem to think Rhaegar loved Lyanna, but, sure, anyone can be wrong. I do, don't I? Because I say Robert and Rhaegar were two different personalities and a girl could dislike one and still like the other? Yes,that's a lot of "love stuff" to assume. And certainly Lyanna coming to the idea of criticizing the sexual behaviour of a man who is to be her husband is a terribly modern attitude in this world of feudal alliances. But you should take that up with the author. I don't think the rest of your comments in the posts in which you quoted my post is strictly relevant to what I said. I have no problem with anyone building up theories and I'm not a Rhaegar fan. I like interesting and creative arguments and theories. But the "Rhaegar and Robert were both cheaters, therefore Lyanna was bound to have the same opinion of them" sounds a terrible argument in light of the complexity of the human lives and characters that GRRM presents and with regard to the fact that the books actually call attention to the differences between them.

No, I'm not bending anything, and there is nothing presumptive about this. We know that Robert and Rhaegar are two very different types of men, with very different attitudes and personalities. It is totally possible that a girl does not want one of them and likes the other one. There is no reason why Lyanna should not see the difference between the two even if she does not give a complete lecture about it on page - actually, it is rather probable that she did see the difference. A "cheater is a cheater" is a terribly simplified view. How many of us are there who have never ended an otherwise serious commitment due to a change of feelings or circumstances? That's very different from someone who is essentially an immature pleasure-seeker, unable or unwilling to think of consequences or responsibility and is continually looking for one-night adventures - married or nor married. As for your other questions: Well, this is about a completely different line of possibilities. Earlier, you had brought up the idea that Lyanna falling for Rhaegar did not make sense because she did not like Robert. I completely disagree with this because a girl not liking one kind of person does not necessarily prevent her from liking another kind of person. Now, if you want to pursue the idea that Lyanna and Rhaegar were not in love, feel free to do it, just find better arguments than "Rhaegar was just like Robert", which is simply not true.

Robert sleeps with almost literally every young woman who comes his way. He fathers bastards left, right and centre without committing himself. He enjoys visiting brothels and chasing screaming peasant girls. He makes promises to get the girl and forgets them almost immediately. That's vastly different from a man who marries one woman and later enters into a relationship with another one and actually commits himself in both relationships. Rhaegar does not chase every woman prettier than a scarecrow and does not visit brothels. Lyanna is not Marianne Dashwood, who condemns "second attachments" as such, what she is appalled by is irresponsible promiscuity without any real commitment.

A long time ago, (in the previous RLJ thread) there was a post in which I replied to @Frey family reunion and it was only just now that I discovered that I had received a reply asking me to elaborate. Sorry for being so late in my response but here it is finally. I hope it's not too late. The posts are here and here. @Frey family reunion said: Please elaborate. ETA: I suppose it's only fair that I elaborate on my parallel to Siegfried. In reality, I think the closer parallels for Jon rests in the Volsunga one of the Norse sagas that Wagner took his inspiration from. In the Volsunga saga, King Volung's daughter Signy, is given over to King Siggeir in an arranged marriage. Like Lyanna's arranged marriage to Robert, Signy is not happy with the arrangement. Unlike Lyanna, she goes ahead with it. During the wedding, Signy's brother, Sigmund, also unhappy with the match, gives offense to King Siggeir. In some tales, Siggeir's jealousy with Sigmund arises from Sigmund being able to free a sword, Gram, embedded by a black cloaked stranger (Odin) into a tree, Barnstokk. Later King Siggeri lures King Volung, Sigmund and his brothers to his lands where he imprisons, them. They are put in stocks and one after another become a meal to a giant she-wolf. Sigmund is the last one left alive, when he is rescued by his sister, Signy who helps him kill the giant she-wofl. Signy, still unhappy with her marriage to King Siggeir, sends her children with Siggeir to Sigmund to help him gain vengeance against her husband. Each of her children fail, so she then tricks her brother Sigmund into having sex with her, and thereafter gives birth to Sinfjotli. It's apparently noteworthy that Sinfjotli grows to be a powerful warrior since his has Volsung blood on both sides of his parents. Sinfjotli's purpose in life becomes to take vengeance for the murders of his grandfather and uncles. In the Poetic Edda, Sinfjotli is accused of being a werewolf. In some of the stories Sinfjotli gains possession of a wolf cloak which allows him to transform into a wolf. After they take their vengeance on King Siggeir, (some of the stories attribute Siggeir's death to Signy who lights their house on fire, killing Siggeri, herself, and her children with Siggeir), Sigmund and Sinfjotli return home where Sigmund marries Borghild and have several children together. However, Sigmund's new wife has nothing but hatred for Sigmund's son from another mother, and devises ways to try and poison Sinfjotli, eventually succeeding. So here we have some repeating parallels with our story in ASOIF. We have the idea of an arranged marriage, where the bride expresses resentment for the marriage. We have a father and son(s) lured into the clutches of a king where they are executed. We have a giant she-wolf, who's death starts a chain of events. We have a character in Sinfjotli (the son of the lady who was the subject of the unwanted marriage) who can change into a wolf. And finally we have this self same character who's father's new wife shows nothing but contempt. Later Sigmund remarries Hjordis and she becomes pregnant with their son, Sigurd (aka Siegfried). Sigmund's sword Gram becomes shattered in battle and Sigmund becomes mortally wounded. Sigmund gives the shattered sword to his wife, Hjordis, and tells her to keep the broken sword until it can be reforged and given to their unborn son, Sigurd. When the broken sword is reforged it becomes more powerful than ever, and Sigurd/Siegfried uses the sword to help slay the dwarf turned dragon, Fafnir. Later Sigurd finds the warrior maiden, Brynhild, and they end up having a star crossed love affair of their own. Wagner took bits and pieces of the Volunga saga as inspiration. His Siegfried is basically Sigurd combined with the origin story (at least the incest part) of Sinfjotli. First of all, thanks for your own elaboration. I agree about the existence of possible mythological allusions and motifs in ASOIAF. The saga you describe may well be a common source for both Wagner and GRRM. In addition to the parallels you mention, I think the incest motif belongs first and foremost to Cersei and Jaime. Here, too, the female sibling is married to a king that she hates, and she also wants to take revenge on him – not exactly using her own sons but another young relative of hers (Lancel). As for the she-wolf who is killed, well, the giant mythological she-wolf also kills others, which makes me think less of Lyanna and more of a certain lioness, on the one hand, and of a certain Lady in the Riverlands on the other hand – both are likely to be killed (or put to a final rest) in the upcoming plot. Then the sword. There is a “reforged” sword in our story, which originally belongs to the Starks, but it is reforged by the Lannisters, and they are also the family obsessed with special swords – their lost Valyrian sword, Jaime’s skill with the sword, Joffrey and his various swords. The dwarf (giant?) turned dragon reminds me of Tyrion as a secret Targaryen(?). We have two warrior women with a romantic interest, one is Ygritte, the other one is Brienne, and it is the latter who reminds me more of Brynhild – it is partly her name, but it is also her description and the quasi-mythological references around her (but I can also see Ygritte as a Valkyrie). All in all, Jaime very much seems to be an amalgamation of Sigmund and Sigurd (Siegfried) to me, more so than Jon. It’s true that Jon also has some of those associations – an affair with a warrior woman, the stabbing; and both Jon and Jaime have had issues with oathkeeping. However, Jaime has also already killed a “dragon” – King Aerys – but then we’ll have to see if there will be any more dragon killings in the story. Now, back to Wagner and the elaboration on my earlier comment. I said I see Jon Snow more as Parsifal (as in the opera) than Siegfried. Parsifal is the son of a knight who dies in battle before Parsifal is born. After that, Parsifal’s mother has only one purpose in life: to protect her son. Therefore, she keeps him ignorant of who his father was, and protects him from any worldly knowledge, raising him in a forest away from all people. Thus, Parsifal literally “knows nothing”. Growing up, he wanders further and further from his home, finally forgetting about his mother, forgetting even his own name. He arrives in a remote place called Monsalvat (still in a forest), where an order of knights guards the Holy Grail in a castle. The knights have sworn to a life of virtue and chastity, giving up their lives to service. However, currently the order is in trouble: their king, Amfortas broke his vow and is now suffering from an unhealing wound and terrible pain, making him scarcely able to perform his daily duty, which affects all the knights. Since the knights have a prophecy of a “pure fool” who is made knowledgeable by compassion, they have great hopes in Parsifal, but seemingly nothing happens that would indicate that the young man has any promise of being the one who could save them all, so they dismiss him. In reality, however, Parsifal is deeply moved by the king’s suffering, and with this compassion in his heart, he sets out on a quest with the purpose of freeing Amfortas from the pain and remorse. He has to face dark magic and has to prove his courage and perseverance. The story involves a wild woman (Kundry, a sorceress) who had seduced Amfortas and who is, in the end, refused by Parsifal. Parsifal finds out the truth about his parents, and his mother’s death causes him grief and remorse that almost makes him succumb to temptation (rather like Robb perhaps), but he can feel the pain that Amfortas suffers and that makes him strong again. Having accomplished the task, he returns to Monsalvat, where he arrives on Good Friday. He delivers the king from his suffering. Sinners are forgiven, and Parsifal becomes the new king of the knights. So, with Jon Snow, we have someone who does not know about his origins; someone who - somewhere on the border of the real and the magical - joins an order to guard something; a hero who is repeatedly described as “knowing nothing” (a very important attribute of Parsifal). A vow of chastity is involved. Furthermore, we can fully expect that Jon will discover his real parentage. Another fundamental Parsifal-motif is compassion, and that is exactly Jon Snow’s best personality trait – his ability to feel compassion for suffering humans. The religious motif of Good Friday is replaced by the importance of spring to come again, and with it, salvation from the threat of winter and its magical creatures. The Holy Spring in the opera can be paralleled with the various springs found in the North. I also think that – perhaps just as Jaime is an amalgamation of Sigmund and Siegfried – Jon Snow is parallel not only to Parsifal but also to Amfortas in some respects, with Ygritte being a parallel to Kundry. (But then again, Jaime also shows some resemblance to Amfortas.) I, personally, find these parallels very interesting.