Free Northman Reborn Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 A Turgon moment of awesomness is coming ;). At the end of WOW we get 10,000 badass Skagosi semi-cannibal warriors... It won't be 10,000. There is no way Skagos alone will have more warriors than the entire Wildling nation, for example. I suspect between 3000-5000. But that is still a sizeable force. Then again, if, as I suspect, the Skagosi reason for mobilizing will be because once Winter arrives, Skagos will be joined to the Lands Beyond the Wall by pack ice, and therefore vulnerable to the Others, then their entire nation may end up migrating South, in which case you are talking about a hundred thousand people or more. Then it may well be a mobilization of every man of fighting age, rather than just the normal 1 or 2% of the population. In which case 10,000 might well become a possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arakan Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 It won't be 10,000. There is no way Skagos alone will have more warriors than the entire Wildling nation, for example. I suspect between 3000-5000. But that is still a sizeable force. Then again, if, as I suspect, the Skagosi reason for mobilizing will be because once Winter arrives, Skagos will be joined to the Lands Beyond the Wall by pack ice, and therefore vulnerable to the others, then their entire nation may end up migrating South, in which case you are talking about a hundred thousand people or more. Then it may well be a mobilization of every man of fighting age, rather than just the normal 1 or 2% of the population. In which case 10,000 might well become a possibility.FNR, that was a hommage and not serious ;). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Northman Reborn Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 FNR, that was a hommage and not serious ;). OK. Sorry. I don't know who or what Turgon is, so my apologies. EDIT Ah, I just googled it. So it's some elf from Lord of the Rings. Ok. Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingelheim Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 I don't know if we are talking of Turgon from the Silmarillion, when he showed up with 10,000 warriors from Gondolin in the Nirnaeth Or maybe I'm just too nerd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arakan Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 OK. Sorry. I don't know who or what Turgon is, so my apologies. EDIT Ah, I just googled it. So it's some elf from Lord of the Rings. Ok. Cool.Hehehe no problem ;).Turgon is the Noldor King of Gondolin, a secret city, hiding for decades and just turning up in the right moment out of nowhere with 10,000 badass warriors to kick some ass ;). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arakan Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 I don't know if we are talking of Turgon from the Silmarillion, when he showed up with 10,000 warriors from Gondolin in the Nirnaeth Or maybe I'm just too nerd.Yep :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bright Blue Eyes Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 It won't be 10,000. There is no way Skagos alone will have more warriors than the entire Wildling nation, for example.Actually, I estimate Skagos at 10,000. Three Skagosi Houses, on an average of 3,000 for non-petty Lords... :cheers: Hehehe no problem ;).Turgon is the Noldor King of Gondolin, a secret city, hiding for decades and just turning up in the right moment out of nowhere with 10,000 badass warriors to kick some ass ;)....and losing. The actual badasses in the Nirnaeth were Hurin and Huor :bowdown: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Northman Reborn Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 Actually, I estimate Skagos at 10,000. Three Skagosi Houses, on an average of 3,000 for non-petty Lords... :cheers: ...and losing. The actual badasses in the Nirnaeth were Hurin and Huor :bowdown: Well, their territory is kind of similar in size to that of the Karstarks or Umbers, and even further North. That said, they do have the whole "island" advantage, which apparently allows the Ironborn to raise far more warriors per population size than anyone else can. So while I put them roughly similar to the Karstarks, maybe they can indeed raise more, thanks to fishing or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Doe Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 Actually, I estimate Skagos at 10,000. Three Skagosi Houses, on an average of 3,000 for non-petty Lords... :cheers: I doubt that they have nearly that many men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arakan Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 ...and losing. The actual badasses in the Nirnaeth were Hurin and Huor :bowdown:Can we agree to consider Hurin as the biggest badass the fantasy world has ever seen ;)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Doe Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 That said, they do have the whole "island" advantage, which apparently allows the Ironborn to raise far more warriors per population size than anyone else can. I think the difference is not that the Ironborn live on Islands, but that most of the freeborn are ready to go to war, in contrast to the other kingdoms where the lords rely mostly on feudalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arakan Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 Actually, I estimate Skagos at 10,000. Three Skagosi Houses, on an average of 3,000 for non-petty Lords... :cheers:Well it all depends on the climate but considering that Skagos makes up roughly 50,000 sqkm (albeit mountainous) and with a conservative 4-5 inhabitants /sqkm, that would make 200-250k inhabitants (conservative scenario). Taking their pressumably "tribal" culture into account (at least compared to mainland Westeros), I dont see it that outlandish to assume an overall potential of 10,000 warriors. I see the problem rather in their equipment which should be (in average) rather sub-optimal. We'll shall see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Reaver Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 ...and losing. The actual badasses in the Nirnaeth were Hurin and Huor :bowdown: Well, considering Huor was captured, I find it hard to see how he did anything but lose, either. The "battle of countless tears" has that name for a reason, after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Northman Reborn Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 Well it all depends on the climate but considering that Skagos makes up roughly 50,000 sqkm (albeit mountainous) and with a conservative 4-5 inhabitants /sqkm, that would make 200-250k inhabitants (conservative scenario).Taking their pressumably "tribal" culture into account (at least compared to mainland Westeros), I dont see it that outlandish to assume an overall potential of 10,000 warriors.I see the problem rather in their equipment which should be (in average) rather sub-optimal. We'll shall see. Well, they should have a roughly similar tribal structure to the Mountain Clans of the Northwest. Maybe just a bit more bloodthirsty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bright Blue Eyes Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 I think the difference is not that the Ironborn live on Islands, but that most of the freeborn are ready to go to war, in contrast to the other kingdoms where the lords rely mostly on feudalism. Nope, it's economy. Fishing and such can take the absence of men in stride. For farmers, that means ruined fields, failed harvests and at least two years of starvation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arakan Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 Well, they should have a roughly similar tribal structure to the Mountain Clans of the Northwest. Maybe just a bit more bloodthirsty.On a side note: I always considered their "cannibalistic" nature more as propaganda tool a la "stay the fuck away from our island", at least in the "now".Any opinions on that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Northman Reborn Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 On a side note: I always considered their "cannibalistic" nature more as propaganda tool a la "stay the fuck away from our island", at least in the "now".Any opinions on that? I am quite open to the idea of them having resorted to cannibalism during particularly brutal winters in the past. Or maybe they even have some kind of ritual cannibalism under rare ocassions - no different to the Children who apparently see human meat as quite edible if the need arises. But I don't see them as practicing regular cannibalism on a day to day basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarLord Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 GRRMs big mistake was that he made the military strength of Westeros too less.I mean back in even 250-300BC an Indian Emperor had an army consisting of 600,000 infantry, 130,000 cavalry and 9000 war elephants.Or the Romans had 400,000 men in 120AD + 200,000-250,000 reserves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingelheim Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 GRRMs big mistake was that he made the military strength of Westeros too less.I mean back in even 250-300BC an Indian Emperor had an army consisting of 600,000 infantry, 130,000 cavalry and 9000 war elephants.Or the Romans had 400,000 men in 120AD + 200,000-250,000 reserves. And, as I said to you in the other post, The Seven Kingdoms could raise 400,000 men if needed. Also, the 730,000 army you mention is quite wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arakan Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 GRRMs big mistake was that he made the military strength of Westeros too less.I mean back in even 250-300BC an Indian Emperor had an army consisting of 600,000 infantry, 130,000 cavalry and 9000 war elephantsAbsolutely and Xerxes invaded Greece with 2.5 million soldiers, not to mention ~2 million support personnel :). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.