Jump to content
EruditeFool

Official Blatant but Honest Self Promotion Thread

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Rychard Wrythen said:

So essentially you feel I should castrate my prose making it devoid of all personality so that these people will like it.

As I told Sporkydog or whatever his name is before, I can't do that.

Your prose has all the personality of Harpo fucking Marx. Unless you change the way you write, nobody will ever publish you.

Stick your fingers in your ears all you want. We're all illiterate, tasteless troglodytes. I just wish you'd sent this shit to Mark Lawrence when he was critiquing unpublished first chapters.

Edited by Spockydog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Spockydog said:

Your prose has all the personality of Harpo fucking Marx. Unless you change the way you write, nobody will ever publish you.

Stick your fingers in your ears all you want. We're all illiterate, tasteless troglodytes. I just wish you'd sent this shit to Mark Lawrence when he was reviewing unpublished first chapters.

 

I won't change it. Not for you or anyone. However, as I said, mayhaps I will start a side project for troglodytes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rychard Wrythen said:

 

I won't change it. Not for you or anyone. However, as I said, mayhaps I will start a side project for troglodytes.

I have a feeling that when you're a bit older (like 15), you're going to look back at this and realize how childish you sound.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the fuck are you still here defending your turgid hackery against a crowd of people with no taste that you profess not to care about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Rychard Wrythen said:

 

So essentially you feel I should castrate my prose making it devoid of all personality so that these people will like it.

No, I'm suggesting you cut the fat from your sentences so that the reader is not encumbered with unnecessary verbiage. "Omit needless words" is up there with "show, don't tell" as a cardinal rule of writing.

Let me take that paragraph again:

At about that tyme, yet over on Wallins Street, somewhat to the north and west of the tailor’s shoppe, Lanuche gingerly walked back down the rotting steps of Thomryd’s cellar and then tottered over to its eastern end with the hideous, makeshift dress hanging loosely over her well-rounded frame. As she went, she lay her right hand lightly on the craggy, hewn stone wall to support her way; and because she was so very petite, the steps didn’t even so much as groan as she made her way carefully down them, almost as a felis would.

We have no point of comparison, so "about that tyme" is meaningless. 

"Somewhat" is simply a weasel word. Don't hedge your bets - be precise.

A tailor's is by definition a tailor's shop, so you don't need "shoppe".

Gingerly implies caution - which doesn't fit with the tottering (which makes her sound clumsy and incautious).

This is from Lanuche's point of view, and she wouldn't call her own dress hideous. Besides, what is hideous about it?

Well-rounded is an unnecessary adjective (and telling not showing).

"As she went" adds nothing to the sentence - it's implied by the rest.

We don't need to know it was her right-hand - it distracts the reader.

"Lightly" is an unnecessary adverb.

"Craggy, hewn stone wall" is an adjectival pile-up. Adjectives aren't evil, but you shouldn't overuse them - they are often the sign of a dull noun. A craggy wall implies stone.

"So very petite" - telling not showing. The fact that the rotten wood isn't groaning implies she's light.

You have her reaching the bottom of the steps, and then tottering off - and now she's apparently back on the stairs. The scene feels confused. 

 

  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've become a kinder gentler over the years and even I want to box this guy's ears in. Referring to archaic diction as some kind of elevated prose and/or vocabulary has got to be one of the more ridiculous things things I've read in this back and forth so far [besides two chapters of the writing in question]

Here's some constructive criticism, Richard: you're stuck in the writing [whether you think it's good or most inthread think it's bad is actually irrelevant] story is what you need to master first, artful prose after. If your story doesn't hook me, and it didn't, I'm not sticking around. I think that would go for most readers, and most writers.

Edited by JEORDHl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Roose Boltons Pet Leech said:

No, I'm suggesting you cut the fat from your sentences so that the reader is not encumbered with unnecessary verbiage. "Omit needless words" is up there with "show, don't tell" as a cardinal rule of writing.

Let me take that paragraph again:

At about that tyme, yet over on Wallins Street, somewhat to the north and west of the tailor’s shoppe, Lanuche gingerly walked back down the rotting steps of Thomryd’s cellar and then tottered over to its eastern end with the hideous, makeshift dress hanging loosely over her well-rounded frame. As she went, she lay her right hand lightly on the craggy, hewn stone wall to support her way; and because she was so very petite, the steps didn’t even so much as groan as she made her way carefully down them, almost as a felis would.

We have no point of comparison, so "about that tyme" is meaningless. You do. Around the time that the previous chapter ends.

"Somewhat" is simply a weasel word. Don't hedge your bets - be precise. Do you want longitude and latitude? Somewhat is the best I can tell you.

A tailor's is by definition a tailor's shop, so you don't need "shoppe". Yes, you do, it's a possessive.

Gingerly implies caution - which doesn't fit with the tottering (which makes her sound clumsy and incautious). No, you can intend caution and still wind up tottering.

This is from Lanuche's point of view, and she wouldn't call her own dress hideous. Besides, what is hideous about it?  No, it's from omniscient third person point of view.

Well-rounded is an unnecessary adjective (and telling not showing). Your opinion that it's unnecessary.

"As she went" adds nothing to the sentence - it's implied by the rest. It tells the reader that the two actions are occurring simultaneously.

We don't need to know it was her right-hand - it distracts the reader. No, it specifically aids in visualization.

"Lightly" is an unnecessary adverb. Your opinion.

"Craggy, hewn stone wall" is an adjectival pile-up. Adjectives aren't evil, but you shouldn't overuse them - they are often the sign of a dull noun. A craggy wall implies stone. No, plenty of smoothly worked stone in the world. And two adjectives is a pile-up? Good to know ...

"So very petite" - telling not showing. The fact that the rotten wood isn't groaning implies she's light. Maybe I was not going for implication.

You have her reaching the bottom of the steps, and then tottering off - and now she's apparently back on the stairs. The scene feels confused. Now this is a genuine error. What's that, 1 in 12 is valid? Thanks.

 

  

While you are not my editor, on the off chance that you are one professionally I will respond just this once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Rychard Wrythen said:

While you are not my editor, on the off chance that you are one professionally I will respond just this once.

 

Don't listen to anybody Dyck, your writing is awesomely good.  Keep it up.  Sky's the limit.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Rychard Wrythen said:

While you are not my editor, on the off chance that you are one professionally I will respond just this once.

Rychard, believe me, I know a thing or two about editing.

You really have two choices. The first is to keep putting your fingers in your ears. The second is that you take criticism on board, and become a better writer.

If you want to go for the first option, that's fine - no-one can force you to change. It's just that if you don't improve your prose - which means cutting unnecessary stuff, being more careful with adjectives and adverbs, and being more precise - no-one will read your work. You do want people to read your work, don't you?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Rcollins said:

Rychard Wrythen, can I ask, how long have you been writing for?

 

I've been active for three years, but submitting to paid markets for only three or four months.

 

 

As for wanting people to read my work, of course. But I won't make it soulless to do so. Thank you again.

Edited by Rychard Wrythen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To put it another way, good prose should not call attention to itself. Good prose should not be a set of neon lights, and should not distract from the actual story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MisterOJ said:

I know. 

I realize PB was blunt in his assessment, but that's just PB. After reading through some of Rychard's story, I honestly can't disagree with any of the points PB was making.

I actually didn't think PB's assessment was all that blunt even. Was pretty tame and, as you say, spot on the money

24 minutes ago, Rcollins said:

Rychard Wrythen, can I ask, how long have you been writing for?

Well people usually start learning to write age 4-5, so I suspect...a couple of years maybe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Roose Boltons Pet Leech said:

To put it another way, good prose should not call attention to itself. Good prose should not be a set of neon lights, and should not distract from the actual story.

 

I have heard that. But art is often stylized.

 

 

Frankly I didn't post it to be deconstructed. I thought maybe someone would actually get a kick out of it.

 

 

How wrong I was. I'll go start that troglodytic moron trilogy now.

Edited by Rychard Wrythen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Muwhahaha said:

 

Don't listen to anybody Dyck, your writing is awesomely good.  Keep it up.  Sky's the limit.

 

:ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 An honest question, Rychard: who are some authors that you look up to and don't consider to be writing for trogs like us? Because I really don't understand what you're getting at.

Edited by MisterOJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from Rychard Wrythen's A Host of Ills - Chapter Four: The Offending Foot.

 

Then, he staggered about drunkenly, trampling over the sparse grass, his bare feet randomly sinking into the still-wet raith. Far overhead, the full lunus continued to hang tenaciously in the sky, its lacht mixing with that from a plethora of blazingly bright siriettes, each of which was fixed in a constellation; the entire nacht was a black canvas upon which was painted any number of ethereal images. Gramrus shadowed his footsteps for a few casual teythes, then stopped in the doorway, his rock-like face set hard and his dark red eyes narrowed.

 

Good God, it's Gold!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lunus? Lacht? Nacht? Teythes? 

Clearly we've a genius in our midst, we are just too dim to realise it

Edited by HelenaExMachina

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ugh. "Randomly" is the worst adverb ever.

 

3 minutes ago, HelenaExMachina said:

Lunus? Lacht? Nacht? Teythes? 

Clearly we've a genius in our midst, we are just too dim to realise it

There is definitely some Dunning-Kruger Effect at work in this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×