Lady Stonehearts Simp Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Aegon’s Propechy/The Others were coming. I know Aegon’s Prophecy was only confirmed in HotD, but it was something people have theorized about. We also know that Jaecerys Velaryon/Targaryen and Cregan Stark made a secret “pact of ice and fire”. I think that the Targaryens lost the prophecy after the Dance and rediscovered it through Rhaegar’s dreaming. Meanwhile I think the Stark’s carried it down all the way to Rickard, Brandon, and Lyanna. Ned didn’t know because he spent most of his life prior in the Vale. The prophecy seemingly died with Rickard, Brandon, and Lyanna. The latter of whom may have tried to tell Ned about it, and Jon’s role as she died. Ned chalking it up to delusions from blood loss and trauma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craving Peaches Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 I hope that 'Aegon's prophecy' does not appear in the books because it would feel like such a retcon to me and conflicts with earlier things. I don't mind Rhaegar knowing about something but there is no indication Aegon and co. knew anything. And the Starks don't need to get this from the Targaryens, they have been in Westeros for thousands of years, they could have their own prophecy to know about. kissdbyfire, Ser Arthurs Dawn and Northern Sword 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kissdbyfire Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 What is “Aegon’s prophecy”? There’s no such thing in the books so far. If it becomes a thing it will be nothing more than a silly retcon. Ser Arthurs Dawn and Craving Peaches 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curled Finger Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Wasn't Martin himself saying something about this during the promo tour for FAB? Then we scoured the books looking for it? Whatever. While I doubt Rickard and Brandon were anything but political players, Lyanna could have been something else. We've got Brandon at the gates screaming for Rhaegar's head, so there is that to the contrary. Lyanna taking off could be indicative of several things. She was just a kid, so maybe she was into prophecy of the North or just dug Rhaegar's whole PTWTP vibe or thought he was dreamy, who knows? How likely are we to get confirmation of either Aegon's prophecy or Lyanna's reasons for taking off with Rhaegar? We haven't had either for years. Do either add anything at all to the overall story? I was fine with Aegon and his sisters just conquering for the sake of conquering and Lyanna just being a dumb kid trying to get out of a lousy betrothal. Ser Arthurs Dawn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Arthurs Dawn Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 33 minutes ago, kissdbyfire said: What is “Aegon’s prophecy”? There’s no such thing in the books so far. If it becomes a thing it will be nothing more than a silly retcon. When fans erase all of Aegon's self-ambitions it honestly paints a rather pathetic picture of his conquest, albeit a comical one. And I wonder if fans picture the conquest with T Swift's "Look What You Made Me Do" playing in the background. (And I'm not referring to OP, rather fans who glorify and defend everything the Targaryens do by slapping "The Prophecy" sticker onto their actions.) *Burning Harrenhal* "I am saving so many lives rn" *Field of Fire* "Guys, pls stop, you have no idea how hard this is for us. We're just trying to help " *Sacking Dorne for the nth time* "It's not me, it's the prophecy." Craving Peaches, kissdbyfire and Curled Finger 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Stonehearts Simp Posted March 27 Author Share Posted March 27 20 minutes ago, Ser Arthurs Dawn said: When fans erase all of Aegon's self-ambitions it honestly paints a rather pathetic picture of his conquest, albeit a comical one. And I wonder if fans picture the conquest with T Swift's "Look What You Made Me Do" playing in the background. (And I'm not referring to OP, rather fans who glorify and defend everything the Targaryens do by slapping "The Prophecy" sticker onto their actions.) *Burning Harrenhal* "I am saving so many lives rn" *Field of Fire* "Guys, pls stop, you have no idea how hard this is for us. We're just trying to help " *Sacking Dorne for the nth time* "It's not me, it's the prophecy." Burning of Harrenhal is arguable because he did annihilate the Ironborn and Hoare Dynasty Ser Arthurs Dawn and Nathan Stark 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BalerionTheCat Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 (edited) A wood witch (or a CotF) told Jaehaerys that the prince that was promised would come from the line of Aerys and Rhaella. Maester Aemon said the prophecy was known for a thousand years. IMO, the prophecy was given by the CotF greenseers. From the Old Gods. It has been given to the Targaryen a thousand years ago. So why Dragonstone and their interest for Westeros. Whatever was said, it pushed Aegon to conquer the 7K. I don't think Rickard & Brandon knew anything. Or believed it. Lyanna, however. TKotLT... BR was already watching the Starks. Edited March 28 by BalerionTheCat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kissdbyfire Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 36 minutes ago, BalerionTheCat said: So why Dragonstone and their interest for Westeros. Because they are Valyrians and that’s their thing, it’s not happenstance that their words are Fire & Blood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BalerionTheCat Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 1 hour ago, kissdbyfire said: Because they are Valyrians and that’s their thing, it’s not happenstance that their words are Fire & Blood. But it's far from Valyria. They built it like their homeland. Why there? Why not along the Rhoyne? And why Westeros in general? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Stonehearts Simp Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 3 minutes ago, BalerionTheCat said: But it's far from Valyria. They built it like their homeland. Why there? Why not along the Rhoyne? And why Westeros in general? I heard a theory it was to control the trade of the Narrow Sea. They also were the ones who sold VS weapons to the nobles of Westeros. Ice, for example, is only 400 years old. It was named after another sword called Ice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BalerionTheCat Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 1 hour ago, King Maegor the Cool said: I heard a theory it was to control the trade of the Narrow Sea. They also were the ones who sold VS weapons to the nobles of Westeros. Ice, for example, is only 400 years old. It was named after another sword called Ice. I don't think they sold VS. They had only 2 swords for themselves. They were far from influent valyrians. Not sure they were either controlling the trade in the NS. Maybe to be outside the control of the greater valyrian houses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.