Jump to content

Mafia Mini 87.5 - Trouble at Wittlich - Game Ended.


Zar Lannister

Recommended Posts

Moving on...

Expecto?

What has changed from here

Ummm.. yeah it does tammy. I find your OMGUS response to my accusing you of over-explaining and WIFOM thing so scummy it is not even funny. And yeah.. how is that for a setup in which I am going to be the one coming across as the one that's doing the OMGUS....

I am loving my sentence from above... ^

to here?

Regfan your posts are so hard for me to make sense of... care to explain what's your angle in the game?

Why switch your vote off someone you think is scummy? Do you think reg looks scummier than Tammy now? Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also what made you drop your 'tunnel' on Tammy, didn't you find her 'OMGUS' towards you incredibly scummy?

Why switch your vote off someone you think is scummy? Do you think reg looks scummier than Tammy now? Why?

Monday, get some new material :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I smell OMGUS, no joke. I think he had the best post in the game so far. His 'angle' seems to be scumhunting. What's so wrong with that?

Whaddaya mean OMGUS??? He hasn't voted me or said anything against me.. as far as I'm concerned =S And if he has.. then it just proves the point that I can't understand him =S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're spewing bullshit. I just went through and skimmed the first 10ish or so pages of 86.5 looking specifically at the amount of emotions he uses per post and it's consistently at least one per post, in most or at least a large portion of posts he has 2, that's nearly no different from here at all.

The terms backpedalling and while he may be doing it I don't necessarily think it makes him scum. I think he just wanted to push a gut based lynched by attaching reasoning he thought might be legitimate towards it.

I thought Ethans entire post was a lame form of a joke, don't think it was him 'faking scumhunting'.

Going for a jog. Will be back in an hour or so.

Why are you defending us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is day 1

12 players remain:

BBMolla, Ethan Glover, Expecto Patronum, Gertrude, Monday, Regfan, Ser-Arthur-Dayne, SnowStorm, Sophie Baelish, Tammy, TheMalcolm, Whiskeyjack.

7 votes are needed for a conviction or 6 to go to night.

3 votes for Expecto Patronum (Sophie Baelish, Tammy, Regfan)

2 votes for Ser-Arthur-Dayne (Monday, SnowStorm)

1 vote for Ethan Glover (BBMolla)

1 vote for Gertrude (Ser-Arthur-Dayne)

1 vote for Monday (Gertrude)

1 vote for Regfan (Expecto Patronum)

1 vote for Tammy (Whiskeyjack)

2 players have not voted: Ethan Glover, TheMalcolm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBMolla. You joke voted WJ after his first post, now you're voting Ethan, who picked on WJ's first post too. Ethan's post was bad but not necessarily scummy are you distancing from him?

I disagree with Reg when he says BB's #18 looks town. It seems null to me as it does not look like something an FM would not say, in fact, it can put him in a safe position if Tammy flips inno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm.. yeah it does tammy. I find your OMGUS response to my accusing you of over-explaining and WIFOM thing so scummy it is not even funny. And yeah.. how is that for a setup in which I am going to be the one coming across as the one that's doing the OMGUS....

I am loving my sentence from above... ^

Bothered for me being active and asking people random crap?? ohh tammy.. have you never played a game with me? It seems so.

Whatever. That post barely registered on the scale of over-explaining never mind the fact that it didn't even explain anything. As far as WIFOM, I fail to see how that is either. So, yeah, you look to me like you're stretching and asking things to appear serious and contributive.

Couple that with your request for an explanation of Sophie's initial vote on you when she's obviously new, seems a little nervous and odd. Add that to your telling me my joke vote was a mistake, which it was neither grammatically or factually a mistake, and yeah you're contribution seems odd and forced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expecto; Did you not read my larger post on page 5? And you never answered my question; What about my posts do you find hard to understand? Also sorry if this is rude but is English your natural language?

Monday; It's not 'defending' it's killing of an illogical reasons people have for their votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whaddaya mean OMGUS??? He hasn't voted me or said anything against me.. as far as I'm concerned =S And if he has.. then it just proves the point that I can't understand him =S

Are you reading the thread? Did you see the big case where he attacked you and voted you?

Ethan

He's a werewolf trying to fake scumhunting. It's not working.

BBmolla? Care to expand? Because this vote stinks bad. I agree with whoever said it looks like major distancing. Although very badly played imo. It seems you are trying to pass serious distancing as a joke :shrug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever.  That post barely registered on the scale of over-explaining never mind the fact that it didn't even explain anything.  As far as WIFOM, I fail to see how that is either.  So, yeah, you look to me like you're stretching and asking things to appear serious and contributive.

Couple that with your request for an explanation of Sophie's initial vote on you when she's obviously new, seems a little nervous and odd.  Add that to your telling me my joke vote was a mistake, which it was neither grammatically or factually a mistake, and yeah you're contribution seems odd and forced.

This is forced over-defensiveness. Just throwing it out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is day 1

12 players remain:

BBMolla, Ethan Glover, Expecto Patronum, Gertrude, Monday, Regfan, Ser-Arthur-Dayne, SnowStorm, Sophie Baelish, Tammy, TheMalcolm, Whiskeyjack.

7 votes are needed for a conviction or 6 to go to night.

3 votes for Expecto Patronum (Sophie Baelish, Tammy, Regfan)

2 votes for BBMolla (SnowStorm, Ser-Arthur-Dayne)

1 vote for Ethan Glover (BBMolla)

1 vote for Monday (Gertrude)

1 vote for Regfan (Expecto Patronum)

1 vote for Ser-Arthur-Dayne (Monday)

1 vote for Tammy (Whiskeyjack)

2 players have not voted: Ethan Glover, TheMalcolm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is reg suspicious, in your opinion?

Cause I can't understand his ways.. at all. Nor do I understand what he means. I take that as someone feeding us pure bullshit or maybe I am the problem and can't understand him. Hence why I want him to explain (himself) to me...

I dunno.. does that make sense?

And I just saw all posts from above... so no.. I didn't see where he attacked me. somehow I managed to skip through that... I'll go check it out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey everyone, time to destroy this shit. Mini normals are my bread and butter. Knowing who is who without being behind 'alts' also makes things a lot easier.

While I know what you're saying and where you're coming from I disagree. Sure, setup speculation alone isn't a town tell it most certainly isn't only ever done to 'seem busy', it actually serves a purpose majority of the time and in Arthurs case his 'scum seem underpowered 2 v 10' is something I was thinking and going to post in my first post as well. Also I can't tell if you're serious or not with your 'emotions' comment but use of emotions are generally not an alignment related tell.

I read BBMollas "I might misread Tammy" as a minor town tell, knowing that I have the inability to read certain players is often something that goes through my head as town but never or rarely ever as scum. Happy enough to say that unless something changes drastically I won't be voting Molla, Arthur or WJ today.

I have minor scum reads one Expecto and Sophie although re-reading their interaction and the manner in which Sophie voted, was questioned and responded to Expecto I doubt they're both partners. Sophies posts come across as somewhat mechanical and reserved which is something that I do as scum and know a lot of people who do as well. Expectos #33 where he says 'Over explanatinotry, WIFOM?' reads as forced and ungenuine, overexplanation isn't a scum-tell and attempting to suggest it is one is the same as saying that conversation and discussion should be limited and restricted while subtly throwing suspicion to anyone that does so. Though I may be misreading the seriousness of the post from him. Expecto

If this is supposed to be the "great post" in which he attacked me... COME ON!! =S

He is barely saying anything about me. Or anything of value at least...

He spills bs about me and other people.. he quotes monday and ends up voting me...

He mentions sophie in my own little "paragraph", what the hell??? =S

Also.. how exactly is my post forced? and tammy will agree with you on this because it was against her... but she WAS overexplanatory... then he goes and says he might be misreading me.. but still ends up voting me... right reg... right...

Also.. overexplanatory is not exactly a scum tell, it IS something people do to avoid getting killed... and even though we all want to survive to win... it does raise my attention... I was in a game once where all 3 FM overexplained on their FIRST posts... all THREE of them.. so yeah... If I want to think Tammy is scummy because I read her as overexplanatory by all means let me do it Reg... now go try and make a case on me that doesn't involve that... thank you very much...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...