Myshkin Posted October 5, 2017 Author Share Posted October 5, 2017 Kazuo Ishiguro wins. Very surprised by this choice, but also very pleased. Ishiguro is awesome, I just didn't think he'd win for another decade or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted October 5, 2017 Author Share Posted October 5, 2017 Some thoughts: This choice proves the Swedish Academy isn't completely allergic to massively popular writers. Two English language winners in a row means that next year's winner probably won't be writing in English. Ishiguro's win means that Rushdie won't be winning anytime soon. Probably hurts Murakami's chances of winning too. Murakami and Ishiguro are tied closely together in the public mind, based solely as far as I can tell on the facts that they are both hugely popular and both are of Japanese descent. Doesn't really seem to matter that they write in different languages and different traditions. The Swedish Academy pulled off choosing a very deserving and well known writer, while still managing to surprise pretty much everyone. Ishiguro comes closer to writing genre than any previous winner. Never Let Me Go is straight dystopian SF. It's also one of the most beautiful novels I've ever read. If you're looking for a place to start with Ishiguro, Never Let Me Go is a good choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polishgenius Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 (edited) I should get back to reading The Buried Giant. It was interesting, but oh my goodness it meanders a lot. Never Let Me Go is astonishing. The Remains of the Day, on the other hand, I didn't get on with at all. By the way Myshkin as a fan what book of Rushdie's is best to start? I tried Midnight's Children and pretty much hated it. The humour displayed there drove me up the wall, so anything with a different ambience in that regard would be nice. Edited October 5, 2017 by polishgenius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted October 5, 2017 Author Share Posted October 5, 2017 16 minutes ago, polishgenius said: By the way Myshkin as a fan what book of Rushdie's is best to start? I tried Midnight's Children and pretty much hated it. The humour displayed there drove me up the wall, so anything with a different ambience in that regard would be nice. Well if you didn't like Midnight's Children, Rushdie just might not be for you. If you're determined to give him another go though, I'd say try The Enchantress of Florence. It's not so thematically heavy as Rushdie's other works, but instead really focuses of the beauty of the language. And language is where Rushdie really shines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maarsen Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 6 hours ago, Myshkin said: Some thoughts: This choice proves the Swedish Academy isn't completely allergic to massively popular writers. Two English language winners in a row means that next year's winner probably won't be writing in English. Ishiguro's win means that Rushdie won't be winning anytime soon. Probably hurts Murakami's chances of winning too. Murakami and Ishiguro are tied closely together in the public mind, based solely as far as I can tell on the facts that they are both hugely popular and both are of Japanese descent. Doesn't really seem to matter that they write in different languages and different traditions. The Swedish Academy pulled off choosing a very deserving and well known writer, while still managing to surprise pretty much everyone. Ishiguro comes closer to writing genre than any previous winner. Never Let Me Go is straight dystopian SF. It's also one of the most beautiful novels I've ever read. If you're looking for a place to start with Ishiguro, Never Let Me Go is a good choice. Actually I am relieved that Margaret Atwood did not win. Two Canadians in close proximity would have made us unbearably smug as a country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted May 5, 2018 Author Share Posted May 5, 2018 For those who haven’t been following it, the Swedish Academy is muddling its way through a world of shit right now, having to do with at least 18 allegations of sexual assault against the husband of one of the members. It’s a very twisty and convoluted story, so I’ll leave it to you to look it up yourselves if you want details. Anyway it’s resulted in Sara Danius resigning her position as Permanent Secretary, as well as several other members resigning or threatening to resign their positions on the Academy. And today it was announced that the Academy will not be awarding a Lit Prize for 2018, with plans to award two Prizes in 2019. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 o.O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukle Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 Based on recent form, though, those prizes will go to Donald Trump, for his use of Twitter, and the writers of The Avengers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 Well, Avengers was pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted May 23, 2018 Author Share Posted May 23, 2018 The Academy has run out of time in regards to Philip Roth. RIP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banjax451 Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 I hope Roth's last action was a middle finger directed towards Sweden. He absolutely deserved the Nobel Prize, which was cruelly denied him due to circumstances he had no part in (international politics, committee politics, and the publishing strategies of American publishing houses - all of which the Nobel committee appeared to blame him for). He'll be a towering figure in the "didn't get the Nobel" pantheon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted May 23, 2018 Author Share Posted May 23, 2018 Bob Dylan should send his Nobel to Roth’s family to be placed in his headstone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maarsen Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 12 hours ago, Myshkin said: The Academy has run out of time in regards to Philip Roth. RIP. I used to read Philip Roth when I was a young lad back in the 70's. Back then I don't think he worried too much about winning a Nobel because he was probably the most widely read American writer. With regards to sexual content, he was so out there writing about masturbation that I suspect a lot of teenagers learned how to do it better from reading Portnoy's Complaint. The book I remember best is Our Gang, his complete evisceration of the Nixon administration. If Watergate did not sink Nixon, this novel would. Who needs a Nobel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted December 1, 2018 Author Share Posted December 1, 2018 Update on the super fucked up Swedish Academy: Since the Nobel Foundation has refused to release the Prize money until the Academy had cleaned itself up, and since the Academy no longer seems to have enough members to actually award the Prize, a compromise has been made. The belated 2018 Prize, the 2019 Prize, and the 2020 Prize will be awarded by a jury comprised of 5 Academy members and 5 non-members. I can’t find the names of the Academy members who will be on this jury, but hopefully Horace Engdahl isn’t one of them. As for whether or not the Swedish Academy will continue to exist much longer, that’s still up in the air. Though the Nobel Foundation has hinted that should the Academy cease to exist, or fail to get their shit together, awarding of the Nobel Literature Prize could be handed to another institution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gigei Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 I have read the news about the Swedish Academy. I was a bit shocked. I remember when I was a wee little undergrad and had some lit and art classes, my professors always told us not to be too impressed by awards. Apparently, the general public enjoys that sort of thing but among writers, artists, and academicians, it's pretty well-known that: just a very small group of people give out the awards (like a committee of 5 people per award) it's very political art/lit criticism has trends just like pop culture does most damning of all - almost all of them just give awards to each other (speaking of the small, more local award-giving bodies) The last one was really an eye-opener. One prof told us to check a list of the award winners and the committee members (of a local award) there was considerable overlap, especially if you knew which artists/writers were in mentor/protege relationships. I'm not saying every award-giving committee is corrupt but rather, I suspect that they tend to be just people patting each other and their friends on the back to say "good job." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted July 3, 2019 Author Share Posted July 3, 2019 So it’s actually rather difficult to get news on what’s going on with the Academy (unless you read Swedish), but what we know is that they will be handing out two Prizes this year, and I think the plan is still to have those Prizes awarded by a mix of Academy members and non-members. But that may have changed. Also I believe that Horace Engdahl has either resigned from the Academy, or at least from the Nobel committee, which if true is a very good thing. Anyway, some speculation. With two Prizes being awarded this year it’ll be the perfect opportunity to honor one of the famous snubs. Rushdie perhaps, or maybe a non insulting American pick like Pynchon or DeLillo. And if non Academy members are indeed voting then I think the chances of this happening are even better. This year will be a bit different from other years in which two people were awarded, because those other years were split Prizes in which generally two people writing in the same tradition were awarded. This year they’ll be handing out two separate Prizes, for 2018 and 2019, so I think we’ll see two very different writers awarded. Maybe a poet and a novelist, almost certainly writers writing in two different languages, and very probably writers of different genders. I also think the Academy can’t afford to court (bad) controversy by picking another obscure or out of left field winner this year, so I expect at least one, if not both, of the winners this year to be relatively well known. Personally I’m still holding out hope for Rushdie and/or Kundera, and would be ecstatic we we got something like Kundera and Louise Erdrich or Rushdie and Duong Thu Huong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ormond Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, Myshkin said: So it’s actually rather difficult to get news on what’s going on with the Academy (unless you read Swedish), but what we know is that they will be handing out two Prizes this year, and I think the plan is still to have those Prizes awarded by a mix of Academy members and non-members. But that may have changed. Also I believe that Horace Engdahl has either resigned from the Academy, or at least from the Nobel committee, which if true is a very good thing. How would the non-members who vote be chosen, and how many of them would there be relative to the number of Academy members? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myshkin Posted July 3, 2019 Author Share Posted July 3, 2019 6 minutes ago, Ormond said: How would the non-members who vote be chosen, and how many of them would there be relative to the number of Academy members? No idea how they’d be chosen. As for the ratio, my understanding is that the original plan was for 5 members and 5 non-members. But again, it’s been very difficult for me to find info on all of this so things might have changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astromech Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 Linked is a March 5th, 2019 Nobel Foundation press release about changes to the Swedish Academy. This may be old news to you, @Myshkin https://www.nobelprize.org/press/#/publication/5c7e5b45d7332000048d54df/552bd85dccc8e20c00e7f979?&sh=false Myshkin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Winter Rose Posted July 5, 2019 Share Posted July 5, 2019 (edited) Could someone explain how wife is guilty of husband's actions? Is member of the Swedish academy responsible for her husband actions? Did she participate in her husband's actions? What exactly did Sara Danius done? Edited July 5, 2019 by Lady Winter Rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.