Night's Ranger Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 The biggest problem is that Jon in his last chapter acts way diffrent then in his whole story.Only time when he did that was when Robb marched,but his friends turned him back.The whole time Jon is with wildlings(and certain redhead)he has his target.When they cross Wall he runs off and warns Black Castle.When Stannis offers him Winterfell he refuses.And in his last chapter,he sends men of Night Watch at Hardhome(?)and tries to rally wildlings for assault on Winterfell.Im sorry,but that is way off his character.My guess:Mel used some shadow magic or something,like Mance,and swap him with someone.If you have something too add,some evidence or quote,please do.If this was already pointed out,im sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Selig Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 We have Jon's PoV. It's him, he's not swapped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Creighton Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 We have Jon's PoV. It's him, he's not swapped.This. And Jon did not try to rally the Wildlings he only read a letter to them and let them make up their own mids. They had a right to know what was in that letter as it talk about their King being a prisoner and their Spear Wives being killed and skinned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night's Ranger Posted May 14, 2013 Author Share Posted May 14, 2013 We have Jon's PoV. It's him, he's not swapped.i know,and thats bugging me.but she could swap him when he was 2 hours with Bowen and Co. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night's Ranger Posted May 14, 2013 Author Share Posted May 14, 2013 This. And Jon did not try to rally the Wildlings he only read a letter to them and let them make up their own mids. They had a right to know what was in that letter as it talk about their King being a prisoner and their Spear Wives being killed and skinned.he read it because he wanted swords,and Mance wasnt their king at this time,they even believed he was dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nictarion Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 It was definitely Jon. Why would anyone else call out for Ghost as there last word? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corvo Attano Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 This is ridiculous. It was Jon's POV, so Unless Mel plugged him into The Matrix to make him believe he was still alive and in Westeros, it was him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Noone Sword Of The Day Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 yea personally i would hate if jon was swapped without the reader knowing. Its basically just lying to the reader about whats actually happening rather than using great writing skills that GRRM has proven to posses over the past 5 books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon Greyjoy Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 It was narrated from Jon's POV. It either was him or it was hack writing of the worst sort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaircat Meow Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 This is one of the most annoying and pointless theories ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterKing Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 This is one of the most annoying and pointless theories ever. Nothing else to add. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalalOfDorne Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I can confidently tell you No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiasyd Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Jon build-up through the whole series to include the wildlings into the realm - it's even mentioned that Benjen and Ned had an utopian project of settling wildlings in, he is not acting out of character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckwheat Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 If this was already pointed out,im sorry.Funnily enough, it was not. Because it has no support from the text whatsoever and it completely impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juli Greyjoy Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Don't you think we'd have noticed that in his own POV? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Idiots Lantern Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 bah. There is no part of how Jon's story ended that I like.If he dies, we've just lost one of the principle driving forces of the story.If he lives, he's got plot armor and he's officially as important as his most annoying fanboys claim he is. Which would be ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minstral Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Jon build-up through the whole series to include the wildlings into the realm - it's even mentioned that Benjen and Ned had an utopian project of settling wildlings in, he is not acting out of character.It was not settling Wildlings into the gift it was bringing settlers into the gift to guard against the wilding Raiders.And this theory is so implausible in might as well be impossible. But perhaps I will be extremely disappointed and this will be the case in TWOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beric Zoolander Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Why would they ever do this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiasyd Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 It was not settling Wildlings into the gift it was bringing settlers into the gift to guard against the wilding Raiders.And this theory is so implausible in might as well be impossible. But perhaps I will be extremely disappointed and this will be the case in TWOW. You are correct, though, it seems kinda logic that settling wildlings will solve two problems with one move: You have the settlers, and there is no invading wildlings. :cool4: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minstral Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 You are correct, though, it seems kinda logic that settling wildlings will solve two problems with one move: You have the settlers, and there is no invading wildlings. :cool4:Or you can place your enemies on the opposite of the impregnable wall so they can raid your heartland directly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.