Jump to content

Most Chivalrous Knight


Recommended Posts

Oberyn is a knight, he offered to knight Qunetyn, it's just his title as Prince simply is above Ser so he uses that. The only reason Edmure and Brynden are called Ser is because they're not Lords (or Edmure wasn't when he was called Ser)

Yeah forgot about that. They're so unclear about it at times, like not every noble seems to be a knight.

Stannis has to be one too otherwise how could he have knighted Davos back then? But he's never pointed out to actually be a knight (nor his brothers). Although Renly clearly had a squire and Robert probably too.

What's weird is that knights often are supposed to stand in the service of a lord, but there are several lords who also are knights. Which one is it? They still hold the same lands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oberyn is a knight, he offered to knight Qunetyn, it's just his title as Prince simply is above Ser so he uses that. The only reason Edmure and Brynden are called Ser is because they're not Lords (or Edmure wasn't when he was called Ser)

Any Lord or Prince can knight anyone, he doesnt necessarily have to br a knight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert because he loved this war business more than anything else in the world.

That doesn't mean he's a knight

We have to speculate that his brothers probably are knights too, hence it's probable he's as well.

No one ever called Stannis Ser even before he became lord of Dragonstone though. Furthermore he denounced the Seven so if he was one does it still count?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit torn on good ol' Barry. I'm very fond of him and I think he's a fine man, but not stepping up during Aerys' atrocities wasn't very chivalrous.

Gotta respect the King's authority, no matter how much it sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah forgot about that. They're so unclear about it at times, like not every noble seems to be a knight.

Stannis has to be one too otherwise how could he have knighted Davos back then? But he's never pointed out to actually be a knight (nor his brothers). Although Renly clearly had a squire and Robert probably too.

What's weird is that knights often are supposed to stand in the service of a lord, but there are several lords who also are knights. Which one is it? They still hold the same lands.

Edmure Tully, he's a knight as well as a Lord. They're typically knighted before they became Lords/Princes/Kings in their own right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edmure Tully, he's a knight as well as a Lord. They're typically knighted before they became Lords/Princes/Kings in their own right.

Yes, but Loras and Garlan for example don't serve their own father. They still are part of the Highgarden household. Usually it's the knights who hold their own lands and incomes and serve under a lord. (Garlan got his own now)

If all the Baratheon brothers are knights and supposed to live at SE they don't serve and pay themselves. Within the ASoIaF universe the relations are a bit sketchy because usually a knight is of lower nobility but we have people from High nobility who are knights as well. It probably has its own rules but they are not that well established for the reader.

Davos gaining knighthood and obtaining his own lands is what real knights would have been (then again he doesn't even seem to ride a horse)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...