Jump to content

How Gay are You?


Weeping Sore

Recommended Posts

Where did you get those numbers from?

The famous 10% figure is actually a mis-characterization of Kinsey's report on male homosexuality. 10% is the figure of combined category 5 and 6. There were only 3% who classified as 6 on his scale, whereas about 35% (this is from memory - don't have the source with me any more) were recorded as Kinsey 0.

Also, not sure where you get the "have loads of kids" thing from. Which society do you live in? In most modernized countries, the average birth rate is down, suggesting that the majority of people in these countries have decided not to have too many children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm bi, but I love females, very much, so I'd put myself at 30. It's a common misconception re: bisexuality that folk down the middle don't bat for a particular side. I'll put it more simply. I like watching Ryan Gosling films because he's beautiful to look at. I like watching Kate Beckinsale films because of the same. I'd rather sleep with Kate Beckinsale. Ryan Gosling would be my default if I want to grab some cock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you get those numbers from?

The famous 10% figure is actually a mis-characterization of Kinsey's report on male homosexuality. 10% is the figure of combined category 5 and 6. There were only 3% who classified as 6 on his scale, whereas about 35% (this is from memory - don't have the source with me any more) were recorded as Kinsey 0.

Here is the Kinsey Institute's own page on "frequency of homosexuality."

http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/bib-homoprev.html

Kinsey himself never promoted a specific figure. In analyzing his research one must always remember that he did NOT have a random sample, and that he also focused on behavior much more than desire or identification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a Kinsey zero, even though some of the stuff I'm into certainly doesn't fit heteronormativity, I've always found blokes pretty bleh, like I almost exclusively watch porn without men in. However, I have thought some convincing ladyboys were hot, and get the occassional man crush, NC-W being one, but I really don't think I could go through with anything. I'll go for 96/4 straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a Kinsey zero, even though some of the stuff I'm into certainly doesn't fit heteronormativity, I've always found blokes pretty bleh, like I almost exclusively watch porn without men in. However, I have thought some convincing ladyboys were hot, and get the occassional man crush, NC-W being one, but I really don't think I could go through with anything. I'll go for 96/4 straight.

Deja vu!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a Kinsey zero, even though some of the stuff I'm into certainly doesn't fit heteronormativity, I've always found blokes pretty bleh, like I almost exclusively watch porn without men in. However, I have thought some convincing ladyboys were hot, and get the occassional man crush, NC-W being one, but I really don't think I could go through with anything. I'll go for 96/4 straight.

Better to use trans* or transgendered instead of "ladyboys".

Note I don't think you meant the term as an insult but I think the word is inherently demeaning.

eta: Also there's a whole discussion on the term "convincing" somewhere around here, will have to find it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better to use trans* or transgendered instead of "ladyboys".

Note I don't think you meant the term as an insult but I think the word is inherently demeaning.

eta: Also there's a whole discussion on the term "convincing" somewhere around here, will have to find it...

Ok, I was specifically thinking of those from Thailand though, and that's the word they use. There's a show on tv here (UK) called Ladyboys and I don't think there's been any major complaints. I wouldn't call a white transsexual a ladyboy.

By that I mean you can't tell they are transsexual.

The facial features of white and black men make that difficult with current technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you get those numbers from?

The famous 10% figure is actually a mis-characterization of Kinsey's report on male homosexuality. 10% is the figure of combined category 5 and 6. There were only 3% who classified as 6 on his scale, whereas about 35% (this is from memory - don't have the source with me any more) were recorded as Kinsey 0.

Also, not sure where you get the "have loads of kids" thing from. Which society do you live in? In most modernized countries, the average birth rate is down, suggesting that the majority of people in these countries have decided not to have too many children.

Not sure about the numbers, I just believe there are about as many straight people as there are gay people, the rest is something in between, including the ones who lean heavily on one side of the spectrum.

And that is recent, the damage has been done, the world is already overpopulated. Modernised countries make up a small part of the planet anyway. There are still too many people who have too many kids, and too many people who are forced to have kids. I am bisexual and relatives try to convince me to settle down with a girl because she can have my kids all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're a guy finding a trans woman hot you're a guy attracted to a woman. No degree of gayness, just a man attracted to a woman who, by your own statement.

The rest of your statement is just wrong there are plenty of trans women of every ethnicity that I've seen that would be/are never read as anything but woman.

and really go read the stuff on 'convincing', pretty sure it was in this actual thread, we all knew what you meant but there are reasons it's considered insensitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're a guy finding a trans woman hot you're a guy attracted to a woman. No degree of gayness, just a man attracted to a woman who, by your own statement.

The rest of your statement is just wrong there are plenty of trans women of every ethnicity that I've seen that would be/are never read as anything but woman.

and really go read the stuff on 'convincing', pretty sure it was in this actual thread, we all knew what you meant but there are reasons it's considered insensitive.

In Thailand they have seperate bathrooms for so-called "ladyboys". I'm not sure if there it would be proper to refer to trans women instead, or if Thai in transition identify as a third sex. Anyone with more insight on Thai society?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did some stuff on that at uni but it was nearly 15 years ago and that's a period of my life where I have some pretty serious memory issues so don't take anything I say here as fact.

My understanding is the traditional 'ladyboys' (if I wasn't on my phone I'd google the thai term here) aren't generally considered transgender and many, maybe most, wouldn't identify as women. From what little I've heard of the tv show I think those that they focus on tend to be from the identify female end of the spectrum.

I think all would fall under the trans* umbrella in western terms, again though I'm really not trusting my memory here so hopefully someone who knows more can chime in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh don't be such puritans. Foreskin is a proper part of the male genital, with a high concentration of nerve endings, and there are no reasons why sexual activities that focus on that part of the male anatomy should be viewed as any more shocking, more depraved, or more worthy of derision than the penile-vaginal intercourse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...