PatrickStormborn Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Dany riding Drogon in Daznak's Pit definitely won't be in this season. I'm fairly confident that David Nutter will be directing that particular episode - I think it will look remarkably similar to the final shot of 'Mhysa', with Dany being lifted onto Drogon's back and Drogon flying at the camera as it pans upwards. And David Nutter recently revealed that he's taking a break from the show but hopes to be back in season 5, so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stannis1991 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I am not sure why they would cast him now. There is plenty enough material in book 3 part 2, so I don't think they should rush it and introduce characters we don't read about before book five. They need that kind of material in season 5 and 6 since book 4 and 5 aren't as good as the first three books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padraig Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I am not sure why they would cast him now. There is plenty enough material in book 3 part 2, so I don't think they should rush it and introduce characters we don't read about before book five. They need that kind of material in season 5 and 6 since book 4 and 5 aren't as good as the first three books The quality issue is arguable but they presumably need Meereen characters for S4. And they need Meereen characters for S5 and onwards when they get deep into aDwD. Why not use the same character? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Zee Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I am not sure why they would cast him now. There is plenty enough material in book 3 part 2, so I don't think they should rush it and introduce characters we don't read about before book five. They need that kind of material in season 5 and 6 since book 4 and 5 aren't as good as the first three books when do you think the capture of Mereen occured ? in Book 5 when we the reader first meet Hizdahr its mention that this in in fact his SIXTH meeting with Dany. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
locke and key Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 am I the only one who thinks he looks slightly too young, I always imagined hizdahr to be older Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkAndFullOfTurnips Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 am I the only one who thinks he looks slightly too young, I always imagined hizdahr to be older A lot of people think that, but for no reason other than probably not caring much about the annoyingly cardboard characters in Essos. He's meant to be young, you can check him on the Wiki. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boojam Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 My guess is that season 4 ends with Dany chaining up her dragons, season 5 with Dany marrying Hizdahr, and season 6 with the battle. I have seen this statement "Dany chaining up her dragons." several times on this forum, for the sullied we know what that means. But it kind of grates on me, because she only is able to chain up TWO dragons. Just wanted to get technical here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkash Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Speaking of which ! They really have to name them this season ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatrickStormborn Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 The fact that they haven't named them yet is embarassing. They felt like they didn't have enough Dany material to make a season in season 2... but they left out some crucial material? Ridiculous. Anyway, I'm fairly happy with this casting. He's not really how I pictured Hizdahr... I imagined him looking more like a younger version of the Yunkish envoy in The Bear and the Maiden Fair. It doesn't help that I also imagined Hizdahr as sort of looking a bit old for his age because of his demeanor, whilst the actor looks quite young. But it's too early to judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boojam Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 The fact that they haven't named them yet is embarassing. They felt like they didn't have enough Dany material to make a season in season 2... but they left out some crucial material? Ridiculous. Bryan Cogman has been asked that question two years in a row over on WIC and he has given the same answer each time. "The has not been a place in the dialog for it." Cogman states emphatically they have same names as in the book, but that they can squeeze in say one sentence in 20 episodes now seems kind of weird. I have not heard Dave and Dan asked that question. We shall see this season since seems they are going to do some Dany story ... shifting and invention?.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franko99 Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Bryan Cogman has been asked that question two years in a row over on WIC and he has given the same answer each time."The has not been a place in the dialog for it."Cogman states emphatically they have same names as in the book, but that they can squeeze in say one sentence in 20 episodes now seems kind of weird.I have not heard Dave and Dan asked that question.We shall see this season since seems they are going to do some Dany story ... shifting and invention?....IIRC Bryan said they will be named in season 3, but that never happened. I really don't know what to think about "The has not been a place in the dialog for it." I mean, all they have to do was have dany say, "Drogon. Dracarys" as i the books, instead of just "Dracarys" :/ ETA: Anyways, a lot of people think Dany's storyline next season will end with her chaining 2 of her dragons (and Drogon flying away), that will be the perfect time to introduce their names if you tell me (if they haven't being named before, of course) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boojam Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 IIRC Bryan said they will be named in season 3, but that never happened. I really don't know what to think about "The has not been a place in the dialog for it." I mean, all they have to do was have dany say, "Drogon. Dracarys" as i the books, instead of just "Dracarys" :/ ETA: Anyways, a lot of people think Dany's storyline next season will end with her chaining 2 of her dragons (and Drogon flying away), that will be the perfect time to introduce their names if you tell me (if they haven't being named before, of course) Has anyone ever asked Emilia Clarke if she knows their names, I think she does. I was surprised when on SKY's THRONECAST that Carice van Houten mentioned THE GREAT OTHER in her interview. So I guess she has read the books? THE GREAT OTHER (even the Others) seems to be a verboten word for the show runners (i guess!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatrickStormborn Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Emilia Clarke has read the books (more than once IIRC), so I would imagine she knows their names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khal Porno Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 She name-checked Drogon in the commentary for episode 10 of season 2 conversationally, so yes she knows their names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seneti Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Concerning Dany's dragons: Maybe they're following wildling traditions here? Don't name the baby until it's two years old? ;) As for Hizdahr Casting: he certainly looks the part. Now let's hope his acting will be good enough to make him more memorable then book-Hizdahr... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boojam Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 She name-checked Drogon in the commentary for episode 10 of season 2 conversationally, so yes she knows their names. I missed that, have to go back and listen. I know Dave and Dan know, why so stubborn about the 'dialog' thing, I still don't get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elenhay Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 I've spoken with so many people who think Drogon's name is Dracarys, it's ridiculous. Although I can see them not wanting to shoehorn it in, too obvious exposition-y dialogue is awful. Not what I imagined for Hizdahr, but kinda realised my image of him was off from the book's description. I obviously wasn't paying attention in those bits. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.