MinDonner Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Sad to say, I fear they're using the Menace of Immigration to redirect that street bloodshed onto some handy scapegoats. That Polish dude is after your benefits!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex. Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 The thing about austerity measures is... well, sometimes you need them. It's unavoidable. The reason Poland was the only country in the EU not to have a recession in the credit crunch is (I believe) because they essentially, as part of how the country moved on from Communism and dealt with entering the EU, went through the austerity thing in advance (not on purpose) and had therefore not gotten into the web that claimed everyone else.But what the Tories are doing isn't that. It's fucking the poor to let the rich keep trundling along as they have been without a change. Austerity is meant to be a quick sharp shock to a country's system that resets the economy into something smaller, but managable and cleaner. What's going on in the UK now is something like patching up the holes in the roof by digging out the foundations, and it's gonna bite us all in the arse. Indeed. The austerity we're being put through is a choice, not a necessity. Lets not forget that this is the year that the wealth of the richest 1000 people increased by 15.4%. The money is there, it's just that we are apparently not allowed to have any of it. They truly are scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derfel Cadarn Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I'm guessing that public sector salaries (not including MPs, obvs) count as benefits also, so we can keep those frozen too. The crucial thing is that no-one's inheritance is threatened and that dynasties can continue!I'm still living large after last year's 1% pay rise anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Marquis de Leech Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 The thing about austerity measures is... well, sometimes you need them. It's unavoidable. The reason Poland was the only country in the EU not to have a recession in the credit crunch is (I believe) because they essentially, as part of how the country moved on from Communism and dealt with entering the EU, went through the austerity thing in advance (not on purpose) and had therefore not gotten into the web that claimed everyone else. Austerity is only ever justifiable on an economic upswing. In a depressed economy, it's as stupid as it is cruel. (Poland had the massive advantage of having its own currency during the crisis. The UK does too, but it adopted austerity through its own choice, not the choice of Merkel and company). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pebble thats Stubby Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Freelance male, sent pictures of unknown female, without their consent. Apparantly just random internet pic. now I'm really disapointed. I was hoping for "noted" hetrosexual sending selfie pics to male reporter. just for the added ebarasment our leaders obviously feel resulting in the need to stress the Noted hetrosexual. Oh and I kinda wanted the photo described. just for the senders added embarasment. not cos I'm interested in knowing. honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinDonner Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Christ, IDS up now? Today is a proper horrorshow. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horza Posted September 29, 2014 Author Share Posted September 29, 2014 An IDS IT project connected with the purchase of basic neccessities. That'll end well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatCoward Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 if labour had almost anyone else in charge they'd have a majority of 100+ at the next election. the current tories make thatcher seem like beveridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljkeane Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I know. Seriously who thought it was a good idea to go with Ed Miliband? And the Tories are so bad his incompetence genuinely worries me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Marquis de Leech Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 The problem Labour had was finding someone who was (1) not tarnished with Blairite New Labour stuff, (2) not tarnished by association with Gordon Brown, and (3) relatively young. I think Milliband still wins. Labour have several structural advantages under the current system, which should (at worst) see them as the largest party in another hung Parliament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pebble thats Stubby Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Maybe they just want to demonstrate how much the Lib Dems have been holding them back from making the real changes they believe needs to be done. Maybe we should all be thanking Nick right now :leaving: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanF Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 The problem Labour had was finding someone who was (1) not tarnished with Blairite New Labour stuff, (2) not tarnished by association with Gordon Brown, and (3) relatively young. I think Milliband still wins. Labour have several structural advantages under the current system, which should (at worst) see them as the largest party in another hung Parliament.I'm pretty sure the Conservatives and Labour will each finish on between 270-310 seats. I think it's very likely the Conservatives will finish ahead on votes, but not necessarily ahead on seats. I think the Lib Dems will be hammered (every poll over the weekend gives them 6-7%, compared to 24% in 2010). UKIP will get into Parliament and the SNP will make gains.Peter Kellner gives the following scenario. Con and Lab c. 290 each. Lib Dem 25. SNP 20. Northern Ireland 18, UKIP 10. Who governs then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamjm Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 An IDS IT project connected with the purchase of basic neccessities. That'll end well. I'm unconvinced IDS even knows what IT is. Peter Kellner gives the following scenario. Con and Lab c. 290 each. Lib Dem 25. SNP 20. Northern Ireland 18, UKIP 10. Who governs then? I could imagine a Labour/Lib Dem/SNP coalition (with the SNP demanding as many powers for the Scottish Parliament as they can get). I don't want to even imagine a Conservative/UKIP coalition because I don't want nightmares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljkeane Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 I don't think a Labour-SNP coalition would be a good idea. Labour would probably be fucking themselves over in the long term for some short terms gains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamjm Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 I don't think a Labour-SNP coalition would be a good idea. Labour would probably be fucking themselves over in the long term for some short terms gains. I'm sure there are politicians out there who aren't willing to compromise the long term for short term gains but I'm not sure there are very many of them, so this probably wouldn't stop it happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Marquis de Leech Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 I'm pretty sure the Conservatives and Labour will each finish on between 270-310 seats. I think it's very likely the Conservatives will finish ahead on votes, but not necessarily ahead on seats. I think the Lib Dems will be hammered (every poll over the weekend gives them 6-7%, compared to 24% in 2010). UKIP will get into Parliament and the SNP will make gains.Peter Kellner gives the following scenario. Con and Lab c. 290 each. Lib Dem 25. SNP 20. Northern Ireland 18, UKIP 10. Who governs then? If Labour and the Tories are level pegging in vote share, Labour will have a majority. If UKIP get ten seats, then they're getting second or third in dozens or even hundreds of others - you're looking at a 1983 vote-splitting situation, and Labour having a massive majority on a very low vote share. (Note that Labour's inbuilt advantage isn't really gerrymandering. It's simply a combination of Tony Blair killing turnout in safe Labour seats while Tories in safe Tory areas turn out, together with anti-Tory tactical voting. Pretty much the only thing saving the Lib Dems from being sent back to the 1950s is that many Labourites will still hold their noses and vote Lib Dem because the only other option is the Tory). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex. Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Any coalition which keeps the Tories out is fine by me. This coalition is a dry run for the unrestrained shite they'll push on us of they are in power again.For instance, David Cameron wants everyone to learn in imperial measurements again - http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/30/david-cameron-schools-should-teach-mainly-in-imperial-measurementsIts not the 50's anymore FFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Marquis de Leech Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 For instance, David Cameron wants everyone to learn in imperial measurements again - http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/30/david-cameron-schools-should-teach-mainly-in-imperial-measurements He couldn't come across as any more panicked about UKIP (whose core constituency likes that sort of thing) if he tried. Next it'll be bringing back the old money. Farthings too, I expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex. Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 He couldn't come across as any more panicked about UKIP (whose core constituency likes that sort of thing) if he tried. Next it'll be bringing back the old money. Farthings too, I expect. Indeed. Also hearing rumours that he wants the military to wear red again and stand in little lines and boxes in the face of enemy fire ETA: I'm also really enthusiastic for my soon to be 18 year old brother who will have to choose between poverty and debt as there's no way he'll be able to find a job where he lives at the moment. The continuing attack on those who caused the recession - the young and vulnerable - is truly inspiring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pebble thats Stubby Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 He is an old fart so its normal for him to think in Pounds and Ounces. Its the way older peoples brains are wired. I even think in Imperial when measuring wieghts. teaching imperial does have the benefit of also teaching fractions and 12 times table and gives practical exarmples of when you would use maths in the real world. so there may be some reason to teach this oout of date measurment system in schools (but not be the primary system taught) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.