Laughing Storm Reborn Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Robert killing the children and Elia if the lannister´s hadn´t is FAN FICTION, as real as saying Jon Snow would kill Tommen and Myrcella for being part of the royal family that executed Ned... As for the hit called on Dany, have a look on her plan with viserys and the dothraki, if you are a monarch and people plan an invasion on your country full of savages, would you send them what?? Flowers????... And Robert didn´t smile at the children´s bodies, he called them dragonspawn when he was arguing with Ned after a long war against the house who ruined his life and called for his head... I look like a broken record now, if people don´t like the character, fine, if they think Robert is not the victim of the war then i´m reading something different... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaderLike Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 :bs: Dany wasn't a child. She was an active enemy and she was fair game. An enemy? All she had done at this point is get married and pregnant. lol. When you say "enemy" you mean threat as heir to the Iron Throne, no different than Rhaegar's children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon's Queen Consort Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 An enemy? All she had done at this point is get married and pregnant. lol. When you say "enemy" you mean threat as heir to the Iron Throne, no different than Rhaegar's children. You do know that from all he knew she married Drogo in order to invade Westeros, which btw it's true? Robert killing the children and Elia if the lannister´s hadn´t is FAN FICTION, as real as saying Jon Snow would kill Tommen and Myrcella for being part of the royal family that executed Ned... As for the hit called on Dany, have a look on her plan with viserys and the dothraki, if you are a monarch and people plan an invasion on your country full of savages, would you send them what?? Flowers????... And Robert didn´t smile at the children´s bodies, he called them dragonspawn when he was arguing with Ned after a long war against the house who ruined his life and called for his head... I look like a broken record now, if people don´t like the character, fine, if they think Robert is not the victim of the war then i´m reading something different... http://replygif.net/i/716.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khal drogon Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Robert sent an assassin after a pregnant Daenarys. Saying he wouldn't have killed the babes in Kings Landing seems to be heavy on the rose colored glasses. Eddard thought his command was so vile, he threw the badge of the Hand of the King down on the table and walked out out of the Small Council. The painting Robert as a valiant hero with morals is really laughable.Exactly. And saying he would not kill Rhaegar's kids who he calls dragonspawn is ridiculous. And they are kids of Rhaegar who he hates more than anyone in the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelittledragonthatcould Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 He sent Quentyn to Dany. lol That is the same marriage agreement that he made while Robert was still alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon's Queen Consort Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Exactly. And saying he would not kill Rhaegar's kids who he calls dragonspawn is ridiculous. And they are kids of Rhaegar who he hates more than anyone in the world. Again :bs:. There have been told many times that Robert was a good man who couldn't have done it. lol That is the same marriage agreement that he made while Robert was still alive. Again :bs: . He made an agreement but he didn't make any other contact and he basically abandoned MadKing's spawns for 14 years and only after Robert's death he actually tried to contact them and move against the Throne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaderLike Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 You do know that from all he knew she married Drogo in order to invade Westeros, which btw it's true? http://replygif.net/i/716.gif Fine, but why deny then that he would have killed the infant heirs to the Iron Throne? You can't have it both ways. If, as far as Robert is concerned, Daenary getting married on the far side of the world = war, then living heirs to the Iron Throne = threat. Robert's own words and intentions condemn him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing Storm Reborn Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 What if i believed Jon Snow would kill Tommen and Myrcella?? Makes it true?? Are we judging people for not murdering someone? What if i believed Rhaegar Targaryen would have killed Robb Stark had he won the Rebellion?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon's Queen Consort Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Fine, but why deny then that he would have killed the infant heirs to the Iron Throne? You can't have it both ways. If, as far as Robert is concerned, Daenary getting married on the far side of the world = war, then living heirs to the Iron Throne = threat. Robert's own words and intentions condemn him. You do know the difference between a child and an adult right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l2 0 5 5 Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Robert sent an assassin after a pregnant Daenarys. Saying he wouldn't have killed the babes in Kings Landing seems to be heavy on the rose colored glasses. Eddard thought his command was so vile, he threw the badge of the Hand of the King down on the table and walked out out of the Small Council. The painting Robert as a valiant hero with morals is really laughable. Exactly. He sends people to do his killing. I don't think he would of killed the children himself. He would have had someone else do it if it wasn't for Gregor; he couldn't even kill a wolf pup. And painting Robert the hero with morals? Just because I don't think he has it in him to kill children doesn't mean he has morals; I think it means he's too craven to burden the responsibility of his own decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khal drogon Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Again :bs:. There have been told many times that Robert was a good man who couldn't have done it. Again :bs: . He made an agreement but he didn't make any other contact and he basically abandoned MadKing's spawns for 14 years and only after Robert's death he actually tried to contact them and move against the Throne.You yourself agree that Robert decided to kill Dany and Viserys to secure his throne. What makes you think he wouldn't have done the same for Rhaegars kids. If Robert was a good man he would have acted against the Lannisters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing Storm Reborn Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Fine, but why deny then that he would have killed the infant heirs to the Iron Throne? You can't have it both ways. If, as far as Robert is concerned, Daenary getting married on the far side of the world = war, then living heirs to the Iron Throne = threat. Robert's own words and intentions condemn him. The first ones are what if´s... no one is denying, he didn´t killed them, PERIOD... if someone says he would, then we need proof he would, because one of this days we are going to start believing everyone would kill the children... i believe DAVOS would kill the children, do anyone else? The second one was a clear threat that not only Robert knew, but almost everyone did and agreed... and guess what? it is happening... Should he follow Ned´s advice? Then when westeros is in full war with savages by the thousands, what would ned say? Sorry bro, my bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon's Queen Consort Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 You yourself agree that Robert decided to kill Dany and Viserys to secure his throne. What makes you think he wouldn't have done the same for Rhaegars kids Ok again yet again because it seems that I wasn't clear. Rhaegar's children were children, MadKing's spawns were adults. Robert had the chance to kill MadKing's spawns before Dany got pregnant but he didn't and the claim that he didn't because of JonA is just bs since her was the King and he could had done it no matter what JonA would had said. If Robert was a good man he would have acted against the Lannisters. Utter bs. He had no reason to go against Tywin. There is nothing to do with goodness. You do not go against your most powerful High Lord for something that a.had to be done, b.happened before Robert took the crown and c. there was no way of fixing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaderLike Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 "And Rhaegar ... how many times do you think he raped your sister? How many hundreds of times? I will kill every Targaryen I can get my hands on, until they are as dead as their dragons, and then I will piss on their graves." - Robert Baratheon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon's Queen Consort Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 "And Rhaegar ... how many times do you think he raped your sister? How many hundreds of times? I will kill every Targaryen I can get my hands on, until they are as dead as their dragons, and then I will piss on their graves." - Robert Baratheon Hmmm so when someone say I will kill you when he is angry he is a killer? No matter that when he has the chance he doesn't do it? Then more than the 90% (?) of all the human beings are serial killers. Good to know! :bang: :bang: :bang: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing Storm Reborn Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 "And Rhaegar ... how many times do you think he raped your sister? How many hundreds of times? I will kill every Targaryen I can get my hands on, until they are as dead as their dragons, and then I will piss on their graves." - Robert Baratheon In all your life, when you were mad, did you never said... "i´m going to kill you" or "i would kill that bastard" NEVER?? well then i must be a murderer because i´ve said some things out loud that would get me to the dungeons Let me just say that when you don´t like a character it´s almost impossible to change your mind, so people, believe in what you want... if he would kill the children, dany, elia, hodor, bran whatever... but let´s point those as WHAT IF´S Robert Baratheon KILLED Rhaegar Targaryen and dozens of wild boars for example... that we can call book canon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaderLike Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 In all your life, when you were mad, did you never said... "i´m going to kill you" or "i would kill that bastard" NEVER?? well then i must be a murderer because i´ve said some things out loud that would get me to the dungeons Let me just say that when you don´t like a character it´s almost impossible to change your mind, so people, believe in what you want... if he would kill the children, dany, elia, hodor, bran whatever... but let´s point those as WHAT IF´S Robert Baratheon KILLED Rhaegar Targaryen and dozens of wild boars for example... that we can call book canon Flawed analogy. He IS a murderer. When you say these things AND send assassins to kill pregnant women, the "You've never been mad before"? excuse goes out the window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon's Queen Consort Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Flawed analogy. He IS a murderer. When you say these things AND send assassins to kill pregnant women, the "You've never been mad before"? excuse goes out the window. He send an assassin to kill an adult enemy. So effing what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balerion the kitten Posted March 7, 2015 Author Share Posted March 7, 2015 The second one was a clear threat that not only Robert knew, but almost everyone did and agreed... and guess what? it is happening...Should he follow Ned´s advice? Then when westeros is in full war with savages by the thousands, what would ned say? Sorry bro, my badHave you read the books? Khal Drogo wasn't going to invade westeros until Robert sent assassins to kill daenerys (who was a child, don't care what any one else says a 13 year old is a child IMO) and her unborn kid. Even if drogo gave viserys 10,000 dothraki I doubt they would have followed someone they laughed at and considered weak across water that they're terrified of. Robert (not the marriage agreement) convinced Drogo to invade westeros.Sorry not assassins, but rewards to people who would kill her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaderLike Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 He send an assassin to kill an adult enemy. So effing what? Daenarys is 13 years old in book 1. Adult enemy? She's a 13 year old girl that got married on the far side of the ocean. Just face it: Robert had a genocidal mentality against the Targaryens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.