sj4iy Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Eh, I'm not really convinced about the rubies until we see more evidence to connect them to something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alia of the knife Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Either "Aegon" is real, or there is yet another secret Targ, or perhaps Jon has a sibling..... :wideeyed: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonSnow4President Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Aerys himself? So the line would be from Jaehaerys, with 7 descendants.. Jaehaerys, the man who made his son and daugher wed, to turn the 2 into a 7.. I suppose that's possible, although it would seem more likely that if it did apply, it would relate to the descendants of his line. Aerys by definition is not from the line of Aerys and Elia. Rhaego, Dany's son. Does he count? I'm a pro-lifer, but I wouldn't really count it as a living Targaryen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearQueen87 Posted October 14, 2014 Author Share Posted October 14, 2014 Does he count? I'm a pro-lifer, but I wouldn't really count it as a living Targaryen. Ask J.Star....I was just following his explanation I think Rhaego does because he was obviously living in womb before the tent. But I admit it's one of those "ehhhh" ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonSnow4President Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Ask J.Star....I was just following his explanation I think Rhaego does because he was obviously living in womb before the tent. But I admit it's one of those "ehhhh" ones. Thanks!!! I was looking for that one, but searching Rhaegar's Rubies didn't come up in the search..... (damn plural). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squab Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 A lot of evidence farming to get to 109 threads guys, well done. Anything conclusive yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonSnow4President Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 A lot of evidence farming to get to 109 threads guys, well done. Anything conclusive yet? Yeah. Jon is the son of Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Stark. And not that this is in any way cannon, but Kit Harrington (the actor who plays Jon Snow) is also a voice in How to Train your Dragon 2. The world is lining this stuff up for us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squab Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Yeah. Jon is the son of Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Stark. so what goes on since that was decided years ago? is it in a circle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonSnow4President Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 so what goes on since that was decided years ago? is it in a circle? Well, for the most part, the usual cycle of someone who isn't familiar or refuses to believe/accept it comes in, cue 20 pages, new thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sj4iy Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Well, for the most part, the usual cycle of someone who isn't familiar or refuses to believe/accept it comes in, cue 20 pages, new thread. You forgot the math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearQueen87 Posted October 14, 2014 Author Share Posted October 14, 2014 You forgot the math. Bite your tongue! We've gone so long without it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sj4iy Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Bite your tongue! We've gone so long without it.... But...but...the timeline!!! The distance traveled!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 I suppose that's possible, although it would seem more likely that if it did apply, it would relate to the descendants of his line. Aerys by definition is not from the line of Aerys and Elia.Why do the descendants have to be from he line of Aerys and Elia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Stargaryen Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Why do the descendants have to be from he line of Aerys and Elia? “Ser Barristan went on. “I saw your father [Aerys] and your mother [Rhaella] wed as well. Forgive me, but there was no fondness there, and the realm paid dearly for that, my queen.”“Why did they wed if they did not love each other?”“Your grandsire commanded it. A woods witch had told him that the prince was promised would be born of their line.”“A woods witch?” Dany was astonished.“She came to court with Jenny of Oldstones. A stunted thing, grotesque to look upon. A dwarf, most people said, though dear to Lady Jenny, who always claimed that she was one of the children of the forest.”- ADwD, Daenerys IV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sj4iy Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Why do the descendants have to be from he line of Aerys and Elia?Aerys and Rhaella's line will produce the prince that was promised.Doesn't leave us many options in the story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Attitude Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Aerys and Rhaella's line will produce the prince that was promised.Doesn't leave us many options in the story. This is known how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhaenys_Targaryen Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 - ADwD, Daenerys IVAerys and Rhaella's line will produce the prince that was promised.Doesn't leave us many options in the story.Yeah, but the count earlier on thread included Rhaella.. Rhaella does not descend from Aerys, so either, for the seven rubies, we should count only their descendants, which would bring the count to five.Or we should count both Aerys and Rhaella, because without that union there would.be no descendants.. But counting Rhaella yet excluding Aerys does not sound right to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Stargaryen Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Yeah, but the count earlier on thread included Rhaella.. Rhaella does not descend from Aerys, so either, for the seven rubies, we should count only their descendants, which would bring the count to five.Or we should count both Aerys and Rhaella, because without that union there would.be no descendants..But counting Rhaella yet excluding Aerys does not sound right to me. Agreed. Their line is their children, their children's children, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sj4iy Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 This is known how? Jaehaerys forced them to marry because a woodswitch told him that the Prince that was Promised would come from their line- the exact quote is right above.That would only leave Dany, Jon and Aegon (if he's real, of course). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Attitude Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Jaehaerys forced them to marry because a woodswitch told him that the Prince that was Promised would come from their line- the exact quote is right above.That would only leave Dany, Jon and Aegon (if he's real, of course). I see, thanks! Sorry didn't feel like searching in 3 pages of new info :| This also has the requirement that this is one of the prophecies that does come true (since not all of them will according to GRRM). But it would be lame if it wouldn't since it's a major thing in the series. My money is on Jon though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.