Maltaran Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Furthermore, you are grossly misrepresenting the facts. South Vietnam did not fall while Americans were in Vietnam. It was only after the US removed itself from the fight and stopped supporting South Vietnam that Saigon fell. But you are presenting it as if Saigon fell and then the US military left. That's a load of horseshit.The US went to Vietnam to stop the south falling to the Communists. The South fell to the Communists. THerefore the US failed in its objectives - or in other words, it lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinDonner Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Oh noes, I got an acronym wrong. You win, America was defeated by the NVA.I'm so done arguing this with a bunch of people who have no real arguments.So does that mean you win? Or did we win? Or did your earlier use of "irregardless" render the entire argument invalid? I'm confused. :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereward Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Damn it, we have failed to defeat him, foiled by his cunning ruse of running away. Clever, clever. :tantrum: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ran Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 A bold advance to the rear is never retreat. It's just victory with a different name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usotsuki Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 It's clearly a triumphant withdrawal, like Napoleon's after Moscow or Robbie Williams's return from America.His victory is undisputed, or at least not disputed by anyone whose opinions matter. *nods*But to provide you with some scant comfort in your moment of doubt, pain and shameful defeat, we offer you the Glee Club of the Damned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denstorebog Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 :lol: Dammit, I totally saw the analogical value of this thread 3 pages ago, but then I was beaten to it by like a dozen people. Seriously, I would've loved to see everyone abandon the thread because of the futility of it all. Then he'd have had to admit he 'lost' the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ran Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Off topic, but that's the first video on Youtube I've ever left a comment on. It's that good. Returning to the OP's original query:Yes.But Europe can probably stand to be a bit more like the U.S. in certain aspects. Not poverty, crime, incarceration rates, gun ownership, wealth inequality, upward mobility, environmental policy, etc. But in having better Tex-Mex and Southwestern cuisine, and fielding quality baseball teams. It's a real problem. Get on it, Europe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalThor Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 A bold advance to the rear is never retreat. It's just victory with a different name.One could consider it a strategic redeployment of obviously superior military power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shryke Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 A bold advance to the rear is never retreat. It's just victory with a different name.I thought it was just "gay" by a different name.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyanna Stark Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 A bold advance to the rear is never retreat. It's just victory with a different name.:lol:UDM should try his hand at some WoW player vs player battles, where the main problem is that people retort to killing the other teams' players instead of fulfulling the battleground objective. And guess what? The LOLbois always lose, even though they killed loads and loads of people, since not getting your objective done = losing.Even if your e-peen is strong.But in having better Tex-Mex and Southwestern cuisine, and fielding quality baseball teams. It's a real problem. Get on it, Europe.Not so sure about the baseball, but the rest I can definitely get behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinDonner Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 This thread looked like it was doomed from the start, but I think our hover-cars have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat! (or vice versa, reports are unclear at this time). Either way, it delivers. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Iceman of the North Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 But in having better Tex-Mex and Southwestern cuisine, and fielding quality baseball teams. It's a real problem. Get on it, Europe.I don't know about the Southwestern cuisine. I kind of like alot of the foodstuff out of Iberia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Sun Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 I would gladly take some parts of the U.S. landscape, the mountains and the open wide ranges, so I can have them at my disposition all times. :) Unfortunately, I don't have not a car, and even less a hovering one, that would be very handy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverstar Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 I'd suggest every country is the way the majority of its inhabitants want it to be, and those who aren't happy with the way it is, move to somewhere where they can be happy. Kinda makes sense to me :dunno: I wouldn't want to live in the US, and quite clearly, many of the people here who live in the US wouldn't want to live in Europe. So it's probably a good thing that we don't, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljkeane Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 I'd suggest every country is the way the majority of its inhabitants want it to be, and those who aren't happy with the way it is, move to somewhere where they can be happy. Kinda makes sense to me :dunno: I wouldn't want to live in the US, and quite clearly, many of the people here who live in the US wouldn't want to live in Europe. So it's probably a good thing that we don't, eh?I don't see how this is relevant to who won the Vietnam war? :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverstar Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 I don't see how this is relevant to who won the Vietnam war? :)Chuck Norris? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyanna Stark Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 There is no 'ctrl' button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljkeane Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 There is no 'ctrl' button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.When Chuck Norris jumps in the water, Chuck Norris doesn't get wet. The water gets Chuck Norrised. :leaving: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalThor Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 This thread looked like it was doomed from the start, but I think our hover-cars have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat! (or vice versa, reports are unclear at this time). Either way, it delivers. :thumbsup:I think our failure to set quantifiable objectives have made it impossible to gauge our success in this thread.I can support more good Tex-Mex here though we've found one good restaurant in town with such. In this particular area of Europe we need better Chinese/Thai food. Baseball? Eh, I could take it or leave it. One other thing I'd request from the States (in this part of Europe), more trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joanna vander Poele Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 I'd suggest every country is the way the majority of its inhabitants want it to be, and those who aren't happy with the way it is, move to somewhere where they can be happy. Yeah, no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.