Jump to content

Neil Gaiman - What are your opinions?


Francis Buck

Recommended Posts

American Gods is a great book IMO, though I understand why some people find it too slow and meandering. It has an incredible atmosphere and really builds the tension over the course of the book.

Good Omens is brilliant, both hilarious and dramatic by turns. It really shows off the best of both authors.

Sandman is also great, but I'm going to specifically recommend The Dream Hunters. It's a work of illustrated prose rather than a comic, and based on Japanese mythology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the "meh" camp. After I kept hearing about how great he was, I read Neverwhere. It was OK, but didn't have me on the bandwagon. I thought maybe he was better at short stories so I checked Smoke and Mirrors out of the library. Again, meh. I wanted to give The Graveyard Book to my nephew for his birthday, but I decided I should read it first, and I LOVED it. I tried American Gods and didn't finish it. I guess the guy's just not for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm definitely going to check out Snow, Glass, Apples, and the Anansi Boys sounds pretty damn interesting, so I think I'll start with that one. Thanks for the suggestions, you've definitely made me much more curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read 'Sandman', 'Anasi Boys', 'American Gods', 'Good Omens', 'Neverwhere', and my favourites of his are 'Stardust' and 'Coraline', which I saw on-screen, and chose not to read. Go figure. He's worth a read, but I'm in the meh camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just finished Snow, Glass, Apples. I thought it was pretty damn good. The writing didn't necessarily blow me away, but the storytelling was very good, and the atmosphere was perfect. I'll definitely be checking out some of his other short stories over the weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like about Neil Gaiman is he's as good as macabre, disturbing or just downright horrifying (24 Hours - from Sandman, Babycakes) as wonderful and whimsical (Stardust, Brief Lives - the Sandman arc which to this day stands as one of my favourite stories in any medium).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like about Neil Gaiman is he's as good as macabre, disturbing or just downright horrifying (24 Hours - from Sandman, Babycakes) as wonderful and whimsical (Stardust, Brief Lives - the Sandman arc which to this day stands as one of my favourite stories in any medium).

I can't pimp Sandman hard enough. Some of the artwork can be a bit of an acquired taste, but there isn't a storyline in the entire run that isn't compelling. I hope you pick up some of those books Francis, as I believe it is his strongest work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a Sandman collection that contains the entire story, or are they always broken up into pieces? So far I've only been able to find them in five piece editions, which would be crazy expensive to buy (at least from what I've seen online...perhaps I should check the library).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a Sandman collection that contains the entire story, or are they always broken up into pieces? So far I've only been able to find them in five piece editions, which would be crazy expensive to buy (at least from what I've seen online...perhaps I should check the library).

They made an Ultimate Sandman collection. I own it in 10 trade collections, but I collected that over about a year. However, it is mainstream enough that even my cruddy library has it, in both forms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gaiman is very overrated. I find the more you like literary references, the more youll like his works - but keep in mind that he tends to stick absurdly close to the references and doesn't really explore past them. To me, much of his work felt like snobbish namedropping.

Also, quite a bit (especially sandman) is emo bullshit. Which is happily supported by said emo bullshitters. Sandman also has morpheus, who is one of the most evil protagonists I've ever read.

His best work is his short stories or good omens, where you can really see another author's hand in actually having something interesting happen and extrapolating past the archetypes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About Sandman and it being emo bullshit:

Kind of harsh, I think. The main character is, yes (and a total bastard) but a significant portion of the plot is devoted to how his being such a miserable self-absorbed fool is a bad thing, so labeling the entire work as such seems a bit daft.

It being an icon of emo-type culture is a bit like Scarface becoming a reference point for 'gangster life' or whatever. Totally missing the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite simply that's not they big a deal to me. It's just a point. Morpheus was the original version of Edward Cullen. Except he's more self involved and more douchy, and doesn't sparkle quite so much.

Also, while one part of the 12 part series is about him being horrible, the rest is him largely being glorified. It's not that surprising that people who feel alienated would glom on to this alien character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kalbear raises issues I had with the work. The characterizations are a bit dodgy. Morpheus gets off the hook with a "I'm Soreeeee" a lot of the time.

That said, watching the plot coalesce, Gaiman's prose, and the efforts of the supporting cast makes the series worth a read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...