sToNED_CAT Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Browns recieved 17th overall, 2nd round pick, Kenyon coleman, QB Brett ratliff, Abram elam. Good deal for them IMO. And Al Davis picks - Darrius Heyward-Bey? No Crabtree? WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack Kilimaro Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 What's the over/under for Andre Smith getting pulled over at 3AM for reckless driving, unregistered weapon, and drug possession?Was he a shady character guy to begin with or is that just a generic Cincinnati joke?Speaking of shady, that trade between the Browns and Jets. Trading back, one extra pick and three players? That seems like a pretty low price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebla Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 while the sanchez trade on first glance looks heavy towards the Browns, I'm not all that sure the Jets gave up that much. a 1 and a 2 for a top 5 pick isn't a lot. And the players they gave up? meh. Both Elam and Coleman played for Dallas before the Jets and they were average at best. Elam has improved, tho. Coleman does play a 3-4 DE, which judging how this draft has played out appears to be high currency.on that note, I'm surprised KC took one that high. This reminds me of when Parcells was so high on another LSU DE, Marcus Spears, that he was willing to pass on DeMarcus Ware at the 11th pick (as well as Shawne Merriman) to get him. Jerry overruled him. Spears was still there when they picked again at 20. They ended up picking a better DE in the 4th round in Chris Canty. Spears is decent against the run but has provided NO pass rush.Raiders. passed on Crabtree. heh. Just speed, baby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyfinger Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Was he a shady character guy to begin with or is that just a generic Cincinnati joke?Speaking of shady, that trade between the Browns and Jets. Trading back, one extra pick and three players? That seems like a pretty low price.He's the immature kid who showed up to the Combine out of shape and then left right in the midst of things. Immaturity + the Bengals + millions of dollars= 3AM shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronn Stone Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I think the 49ers just hit the lottery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebla Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I think the 49ers just hit the lottery.i agree. I also like the Packers pick. 3-4 DT is VERY hard to find. Plus Green Bay right now really doesn't have the horses up front to run a 3-4. They got one now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyfinger Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I've been getting a few calls from some of my friends/relatives who are Browns fans and they believe that Beenie Wells will be their 17th pick. I hope this is the case because I believe Wells could put up ROY numbers for Cleveland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sToNED_CAT Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 MdDaniels is realy dumb. So Denver has absolutely no defense, no pass rush in their new 3-4 scheme and he takes Moreno, after he signed 3 running backs in offseason? They now have 7 Rbs or so. I thought Orakpo or Maualuga would be much better choices. All AFC West teams draft pretty stupidly IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurktan Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I am excstatic. I had hoped the Skins would trade up a bit to get Orakpo but then he falls in their lap? Sweet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Walker Texas Ranger Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 wtf are the browns doing? I don't mean just now- I mean the entire offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronn Stone Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Why did the Eagles draft another DeSean Jackson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sToNED_CAT Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Why did the Eagles draft another DeSean Jackson?Yeah, with Jackson already there, they need posession/YAC reciever more. They should have traded that pick for Boldin, who is already proven. They have enough cap space to give him nice contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trystane Posted April 25, 2009 Author Share Posted April 25, 2009 Why did the Eagles draft another DeSean Jackson?They're going to use Maclin in place of Demps and Jackson for kick/punt returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebla Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Yeah, with Jackson already there, they need posession/YAC reciever more. They should have traded that pick for Boldin, who is already proven. They have enough cap space to give him nice contract.well, that's the problem. The Eagles generally don't pay big contracts. They usually draft replacements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mexal Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm actually extremely happy with the Bengals pick. I don't mind immature players. They'll be fine in a NFL regiment. There were plenty of teams that didn't really care about Andre Smith's combine episode. He was considered the best O-Lineman in the draft for awhile then he had that combine shit and dropped. Then he rose back up the charts again. At the end of the day, he's an absolute beast of a run blocker and that's exactly what the Bengals needed. He's not a guy to get in trouble with the law. He'll be fine with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benderschweiz Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Belicheck and Mangini are still trying to outdo each other I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyfinger Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Is it just me or are the Pats, Browns, and Ravens collectively conspiring to fuck the Steelers out of all of their potential picks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sToNED_CAT Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 well, that's the problem. The Eagles generally don't pay big contracts. They usually draft replacements.They had no problem to give big money to Peters who whined his way out of Buffalo. Why not give 7-8 mil./yr to Boldin? Rookie recievers rarely produce in first 2 years anyway and McNabb won't be there forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xray the Enforcer Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Whoa. I just turned on the draft and I am greeted with 500 meatheads screaming U-S-A! like it was a fucking Nuremberg rally. :wideeyed: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronn Stone Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Yeah, with Jackson already there, they need posession/YAC reciever more. They should have traded that pick for Boldin, who is already proven. They have enough cap space to give him nice contract.Whether you go Boldin or not, they will find it very hard to make both Maclin and Jackson on the field at the same time. And the Eagles have too many holes to be spending a major pick on a special teamer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.