Jump to content

The Marquis de Leech

Members
  • Posts

    15,267
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Marquis de Leech

  1. I think you have to add several nuances here:

    • Morgoth's nihilism arose because he wanted the world to be his. The world couldn't be his, therefore he wants to destroy the world.
    • Sauron's "good" desires have evaporated by the time of The Lord of the Rings. Sauron simply wants to Rule. Why? Because he thinks himself as Ruler is, by definition, the most desirable outcome. Long ago, he might have framed it as the Ends Justify the Means. But now it's the Means are the Ends, and he's defined more by his utter cynicism than by any positive motives. It's also an interesting question as to why Sauron (the great admin and planner) decided to team up with a glorified toddler hell-bent on destruction.
    • Saruman might be on the same path as Sauron, but he's got complexities of his own. Most notable is that he sees himself as making the best of a bad situation (Sauron will win. Let's cut a deal). He also has a weird little vendetta against Gandalf - a personality quirk of pettiness, rather than a statement about wider metaphysics. Lumping him in with Sauron is a mistake.

    The notion that "man is the measure of all things" is hardly modern, of course. Protagoras pre-dates Plato. And if anyone in Tolkien is a comment on Nietzsche, it is neither Sauron nor Saruman, but rather Feanor.

  2. On 10/27/2023 at 4:15 AM, maarsen said:

    So did I a few years ago, only to find that the last few bits of the book is lost to time. If anything it does show we really have learned nothing in the ensuing millenia.

    I think the implication is that Thucydides never got around to completing the book.

    Xenophon apparently starts off where Thucydides leaves off, and even tries to imitate his style. Which means the book was unfinished in Xenophon's day too.

  3. On 5/30/2023 at 1:49 PM, Starkess said:

    I like it but am cynical this is a genie that can be forced back into the bottle.

    As a writer, it's disheartening. I thought the robots were supposed to be like sweeping the streets and cleaning houses to give the humans more time for writing...also AI writing is (without general AI, which is nowhere near what we have) by definition derivative. They literally cannot come up with anything creative. But what they have is speed and volume, which means wading through the dreck to find the good writers will become even more difficult than it already is.

    Yep. The problem here isn't actually that AI will make writers redundant. It won't. The problem is that it makes it so much harder for publishers and magazines - which in turn screws over writers.

  4. On 6/8/2023 at 2:39 AM, Ser Drewy said:

    This is great, though it is only the 150 letters originally cut from the 1981 edition. A fair bit has been unearthed in the last forty years, and it would be nice if an expanded letters could take that into account.

  5. In one of those strange (and sad) examples of costs increasing, I have been notified by my publisher that copies of Wise Phuul generate a negative royalty (at current prices) when purchased via bookshops in Australia. They have sent off an email to the printer about this (several other books are in a similar predicament, generally worse), and I'm waiting on further updates, but it's definitely a sign that Times are Tough for small presses. The redeeming feature is that the publisher sells the vast majority of their books online.

  6. The polls only have National/ACT about five points ahead of Labour/Green. That's not 2008, much less a 1990 apocalypse. Labour are weak right now, but a win in October is not unthinkable.

    So far as diversity goes... one would hope that policy would actually still matter more than gender or skin colour. The portion of the population who would be excited by such things are already voting Green anyway.

  7. On the leadership, it really hinges on whether Chris Hipkins can get the 2/3 of Labour MPs necessary. I personally do not like Hipkins, who has the persona of a smug bureaucrat, and all of Ardern's reluctance to engage with concrete policy without her fundamental good nature. The Right consider him competent, but he excites exactly no-one.

    If Hipkins does not get 2/3, it goes to the membership. I think they are more likely to go for Michael Wood, who is more focused on traditional economic Leftism than Ardern's more social liberal stances.

  8. On 1/10/2023 at 5:22 AM, Derfel Cadarn said:

    Congrats! Are you sending it to Inspired Quill again? Got Wise Phuuk in paperback.

    Yep. I'm contractually obliged to give IQ the first dibs.

    (I also keep trying to get my local library to order a copy of your Resurrection Men, but thus far to no avail).

    Anyway... I've completed a preliminary edit of the Old Phuul manuscript - consisting of (1) editing back through the chapters from last to first, to make sure I focus more on fixing prose and less on reading my own story, and (2) searching out usage of the word "be", to hunt down weaker sentences. "Was" and "is" are legitimate, but the verb in its "be" form is generally tougher to justify. My plan now is to let the manuscript sit for a week, and then resume editing. 

  9. The last couple of months have been truly excellent, so far as progress on Old Phuul goes (turns out that writing on a laptop that isn't falling to pieces is a much more pleasurable experience). Manuscript now over 85,000 words... as fully rewritten from the beginning. I think I am on track to have the damned thing finished within the next month or so.

    Of course, this also means that Old Phuul will not be a standalone, and that Rhea's story will need to continue into another book. I am also starting to wonder if Rhea Phuul's somewhat unique personality traits - she is much more alien than her brother, in terms of psychology - will disrupt the reading experience:

    Spoiler

    Is fantasy ready for a necrophiliac protagonist?

     

  10. 3 hours ago, Impmk2 said:

    Hmm I assumed NZ might have the same kind of system but on looking into it seems somewhat unique to here. Stems from an independant tribunal which was apparently set up in the 1950s to deal with settling workplace law / disputes, and also has the power to set minimum wages across industries (currently guise is the fair work comission).

    New Zealand had the Arbitration Court from 1894 to the 1970s. Basically, the union would put its wage demand, the employer would put their proposal, and the Court would rule on what everyone got, industry-wide. On paper, the system was designed to prevent strikes. In practice, it started running into issues as early as 1908.

  11. Taxation is a political decision, and ought to be treated as such. Ditto monetary policy - I have a heartfelt loathing for the Reserve Bank Act 1989 on democratic grounds.

    Anyway, local council elections in New Zealand are bad news for the Left. My own home town has gone back to the old Tartan Mafia for the first time in three decades.

×
×
  • Create New...