El Guapo

No. The Baratheons got the throne because they won the war and conquered King Landing. And no every Targaryen was not killed off as Viserys and Daenerys were still alive and kicking. Jon never had the throne to begin with. The only person Dany took the throne from was Cersei.

That is not how it works. The Targaryens haven't sat on the Iron Throne in 20 years. There is no line of succession any longer. Both of them are claimants at this point and both would have to take back the throne by force.

Yeah that is not how it works. Both Jon and Dany were claimants to the Iron Throne. No more no less. They each would have to conquer Westeros to claim it and no Jon can't do anything he wants. lol

"Really? well realistically I should avenge her death by cutting your head off but I guess being back here is punishment enough for you. lets go eat"

I am sure it did. Just as it made creative sense to them that Grey Worm threw Jon in a dumgeon for a couple months rather than slice Jon's throat on the spot for murdering his Queen. lol

Totally agree that burning the IT was cheesy. What Drogon should have done is incinerate Jon right on the spot for killing his mother. I mean that would actually make sense so I understand why D&D didn't go that route.

That is not true at all. Read the books. Barristan certainly didn't think this. Nor did Tyrion. Or Jorah, or Kevin Lannister. Or Doran Martell for that matter. Males only have a better claim that is it.

She always had a claim to the throne as does anyone descended from King Aerys. You don't lose your claim. You just have to fight to get your throne back.

Granted it is a modern example but Queen Elizabeth did not take her husband's surname when she married Prince Phillip. The British royal family remains the House of Windsor.

I am surprised they didn't play Ride of the Valkyries as she was torching the city. That would have been cool.

Yara didn't submit to Dany. She allied with Dany, as Dany agreed to let them be independent in return for supporting her claim. Than this season Yara decided to take the Iron Islands back in Dany's name and not her own name for reasons that don't make sense to me. But then to top it off she now doesn't want to be independent and wants to be ruled by a Stark King? Dumb and illogical on so many lelvels

This is especially true for the Iron Islands where Yara had already secured their independence from Queen Daenerys but now suddenly she wants to be ruled again but this time by a Stark King? Makes no sense. Nor does it makes sense for Dorne either who have always been extremely independence minded. And why wouldn't the Vale decide to join up with the North giving that Lord Royce has essentially been Sansa's top advisor for the last two season?

Yeah I give this new system of theirs about 10 years or so after the dust settles before some ambitious Lord or Lords decide that maybe the kid in the wheelchair wasn't the best choice to rule Westeros after all and then try to seize the throne for themselves.

Oh I will definitely keep reading the books, that is if they are ever published. For one I am not convinced that is how the books will end but if it is how Dany turns out I have faith that George will write a much more interesting story than D&D did

Are people really arguing whether or not Sansa had any legal authority to tell Edmure to sit down? Because from what I saw Edmure was making an ass of himself and wasting everyone's time and only Sansa had the balls to tell him to shut up and sit down.