Jump to content

Ser Quork

Members
  • Content count

    1,447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ser Quork

  • Rank
    Council Member
  • Birthday December 21

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    London

Recent Profile Visitors

3,650 profile views
  1. Ser Quork

    Master thread on what the Show means for the book plot

    If GRRM does either of those, I'm sure it'll make sense within his narrative. I don't see it at the moment, and I don't believe either will happen in the books because in the show 1) Sansa was ripped out of her own narrative and shoved in Theon's/Stannis's/Jon's storylines and 2) they did nothing sensible with Bran that would make him monarch material. There's loads of wiggle room that I can see - a clear ocean of it. Yes, I believe Sansa will be a player of the game of thrones, but in and from the Vale, unless GRRM shows me otherwise.
  2. Elio and Linda have done a segment on YouTube re. the endgame and, on the whole, I agree with them. Needless to say, they're also struggling with the Bran as king scenario.
  3. Ser Quork

    Master thread on what the Show means for the book plot

    Agreed.
  4. Meanwhile, a new power rises in Valyria - it's Daenerys resurrected by Red Rahloo and she's not much happier than Lady Stoneheart. Hijinks ensue.
  5. Ser Quork

    Master thread on what the Show means for the book plot

    He'd probably get better if they'd stop poisoning him, don't you think?
  6. Ser Quork

    Master thread on what the Show means for the book plot

    There's a great deal here that I agree with, especially the bold. They certainly mishandled Bran's storyline very badly that we have to go through mental gymnastics to get to this end point. I'm not convinced this is his end-point. I do believe, however, GRRM can get him there in a logical manner, if that's his plan. I've thought he'd stay in that cave and the show hasn't shown me anything to change my mind on that. Given we already know that Book!Bran has gained power even Bloodraven hasn't, I think it's not beyond the realms of possibility that he'll be able to exercise influence from his "weirwood throne". I believe there will be real adverse consequences to Jon's resurrection/re-awakening after his time in Ghost. We can't ignore what we've seen with Beric and Lady Stoneheart or Varamyr's revelations. They have to bite in some way. In addition, I've long thought that Jon would end his story in the North (the heart of Winter, to be precise) and lose his life to the fight with the Others - the hidden prince who remains hidden. That's my pet theory, but I'm not wedded to it. If he doesn't, I have no doubt I'll be satisfied with whatever GRRM concocts. My watch wait continues.
  7. Too late for that, sadly.
  8. I could see a scenario where Jorah could be the one to kill her, in fact, as a mercy killing, for sure, but not otherwise.
  9. I normally love programmes about how inventive TV shows are made but I haven't been able to watch any of the GoT since season 5 because of D7D's moronic pronouncements.
  10. Ser Quork

    New Zealand

    Let's hope so.
  11. This rant was quite enjoyable. I agreed with everything he said about the pacing and tedium, especially.
  12. Ser Quork

    Master thread on what the Show means for the book plot

    I think they would if Bran makes a substantive and quantifiable difference to the war, for example., using the ravens to scout positions or using his ability to see elsewhere to gain advantages for their own armies. He did sit as Lord of Winterfell before Theon took over the castle so he does have some of that experience too. I mean - it could work if it's told properly.
  13. Ser Quork

    Master thread on what the Show means for the book plot

    I'm on board with this.
×